Facebook-supported tasks for exploring critical and creative thinking in a physics teaching course

IF 2.5 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Knowledge Management & E-Learning-An International Journal Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.34105/j.kmel.2021.13.004
J. Sliško
{"title":"Facebook-supported tasks for exploring critical and creative thinking in a physics teaching course","authors":"J. Sliško","doi":"10.34105/j.kmel.2021.13.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research shows that traditional teacher-and-content-centered education doesn’t give students good preparation in critical and creative thinking. This article presents a qualitative study of student performances in two original learning tasks, one related to critical thinking and the other related to creative thinking. The study was carried out in an obligatory physics teaching course for undergraduate students. The first learning task focused on critical thinking, in which students were asked to evaluate various defects in an artificially contextualized electrostatic exercise. Students’ performances, collected via Google Classroom, show that they were able to detect and justify its contextual defects using real-world knowledge. A big challenge to students was to provide quantitative arguments against noticed huge electric charge allegedly created in described electrostatic cling. The second learning task focused on creative thinking, in which students engaged in a multi-step learning sequence to elaborate one explanation and two predictions related to enigmatic behavior of a tomato. A secret and closed Facebook group was administered to present the subtasks in the sequence and receive students’ answers in real time. The results show that students performed better in the subtasks that called for a near knowledge transfer than in other ones calling for a far knowledge transfer. In their reflective comments about the sequence, students recognized the importance of “thinking out of the box” for deeper learning of physics. Based on the results, suggestions on the design of critical and creative thinking related tasks are discussed for future implementation.","PeriodicalId":45327,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Management & E-Learning-An International Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Management & E-Learning-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2021.13.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Research shows that traditional teacher-and-content-centered education doesn’t give students good preparation in critical and creative thinking. This article presents a qualitative study of student performances in two original learning tasks, one related to critical thinking and the other related to creative thinking. The study was carried out in an obligatory physics teaching course for undergraduate students. The first learning task focused on critical thinking, in which students were asked to evaluate various defects in an artificially contextualized electrostatic exercise. Students’ performances, collected via Google Classroom, show that they were able to detect and justify its contextual defects using real-world knowledge. A big challenge to students was to provide quantitative arguments against noticed huge electric charge allegedly created in described electrostatic cling. The second learning task focused on creative thinking, in which students engaged in a multi-step learning sequence to elaborate one explanation and two predictions related to enigmatic behavior of a tomato. A secret and closed Facebook group was administered to present the subtasks in the sequence and receive students’ answers in real time. The results show that students performed better in the subtasks that called for a near knowledge transfer than in other ones calling for a far knowledge transfer. In their reflective comments about the sequence, students recognized the importance of “thinking out of the box” for deeper learning of physics. Based on the results, suggestions on the design of critical and creative thinking related tasks are discussed for future implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在物理教学课程中探索批判性和创造性思维的facebook支持任务
研究表明,传统的以教师和内容为中心的教育并没有给学生提供批判性和创造性思维的良好准备。本文对学生在两个原始学习任务中的表现进行了定性研究,一个与批判性思维有关,另一个与创造性思维有关。本研究是在本科物理必修课程中进行的。第一个学习任务侧重于批判性思维,要求学生在人为情境化的静电练习中评估各种缺陷。通过谷歌课堂收集的学生表现表明,他们能够使用现实世界的知识发现并证明其上下文缺陷。对学生来说,一个很大的挑战是提供定量的论据,反对据称在描述的静电粘附中产生的巨大电荷。第二项学习任务侧重于创造性思维,在这项任务中,学生们参与了一个多步骤的学习序列,以阐述与番茄神秘行为有关的一个解释和两个预测。他们在Facebook上设立了一个秘密的封闭小组,按顺序呈现子任务,并实时接收学生的答案。结果表明,学生在需要近距离知识转移的子任务上的表现优于其他需要远距离知识转移的子任务。在他们对这个序列的反思评论中,学生们认识到“跳出框框思考”对于深入学习物理的重要性。在此基础上,讨论了批判性和创造性思维相关任务的设计建议,以供未来实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
A scoping review comparing different mapping approaches pointing to the need for standardizing concept maps in medical education: A preliminary analysis Analyzing the syntax and salience of causal links embedded within semantic links in concept maps: Implications for temporal flow and learning transfer Concept maps for formative assessment: Creation and implementation of an automatic and intelligent evaluation method Editorial: Concept mapping: Improving learning and understanding Improving learning and understanding through concept mapping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1