Association between Mothers’ Attachment Styles and Parenting Stress among Japanese Mothers with Toddlers

IF 1.2 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatry international Pub Date : 2022-03-28 DOI:10.3390/psychiatryint3020010
A. Kit, K. Arima, Yasuyo Abe, S. Mizukami, Yoshihito Tomita, Maiko Hasegawa, Y. Sou, Takayuki Nishimura, M. Ohnishi, K. Aoyagi
{"title":"Association between Mothers’ Attachment Styles and Parenting Stress among Japanese Mothers with Toddlers","authors":"A. Kit, K. Arima, Yasuyo Abe, S. Mizukami, Yoshihito Tomita, Maiko Hasegawa, Y. Sou, Takayuki Nishimura, M. Ohnishi, K. Aoyagi","doi":"10.3390/psychiatryint3020010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Parenting stress is affected by various factors, including maternal attachment; however, the number of studies focusing on Japanese samples is limited. As such, we explored the association between mothers’ attachment styles and parenting stress among Japanese mothers with 18-month-old toddlers. This cross-sectional study was conducted in Sasebo City, Japan between 2018 and 2019. Anonymous self-reported questionnaires were distributed to 1399 mothers who attended an infant health check-up. We categorized maternal attachment style as secure, anxious/ambivalent, or avoidant, and conducted a multiple logistic regression analysis to evaluate the associations between each attachment style and parenting stress. Of the 1399 mothers, 529 responded to the survey (37.8%). About 40% reported experienced parenting stress. Further, approximately two-thirds showed a secure attachment style, 20% had an anxious/ambivalent style, and 15% had an avoidant style. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, the ambivalently attached mothers had a significantly higher level of parenting stress than those with secure attachment (odds ratio = 2.4, 95% confidence interval (1.5, 3.9)), but avoidantly attached mothers did not have a significantly higher level of parenting stress than those with secure attachment (odds ratio = 0.9, 95% confidence interval (0.5, 1.6)). The findings demonstrate that an anxious/ambivalent attachment style is associated with a higher level of parenting stress than a secure style. Thus, it is important for experts to understand the mother’s attachment style when offering childrearing support.","PeriodicalId":93808,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint3020010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parenting stress is affected by various factors, including maternal attachment; however, the number of studies focusing on Japanese samples is limited. As such, we explored the association between mothers’ attachment styles and parenting stress among Japanese mothers with 18-month-old toddlers. This cross-sectional study was conducted in Sasebo City, Japan between 2018 and 2019. Anonymous self-reported questionnaires were distributed to 1399 mothers who attended an infant health check-up. We categorized maternal attachment style as secure, anxious/ambivalent, or avoidant, and conducted a multiple logistic regression analysis to evaluate the associations between each attachment style and parenting stress. Of the 1399 mothers, 529 responded to the survey (37.8%). About 40% reported experienced parenting stress. Further, approximately two-thirds showed a secure attachment style, 20% had an anxious/ambivalent style, and 15% had an avoidant style. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, the ambivalently attached mothers had a significantly higher level of parenting stress than those with secure attachment (odds ratio = 2.4, 95% confidence interval (1.5, 3.9)), but avoidantly attached mothers did not have a significantly higher level of parenting stress than those with secure attachment (odds ratio = 0.9, 95% confidence interval (0.5, 1.6)). The findings demonstrate that an anxious/ambivalent attachment style is associated with a higher level of parenting stress than a secure style. Thus, it is important for experts to understand the mother’s attachment style when offering childrearing support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本幼童母亲依恋类型与养育压力的关系
养育压力受多种因素影响,包括母亲依恋;然而,针对日本样本的研究数量有限。因此,我们在日本有18个月大幼儿的母亲中探讨了母亲依恋类型和养育压力之间的关系。这项横断面研究于2018年至2019年在日本佐世保市进行。向参加婴儿健康检查的1399名母亲分发了匿名自我报告的调查问卷。我们将母亲依恋类型分为安全型、焦虑型/矛盾型和回避型,并进行了多元逻辑回归分析,以评估每种依恋类型与养育压力之间的关系。在1399名母亲中,有529人回应了调查,占37.8%。约40%的人表示经历过养育压力。此外,大约三分之二的人表现为安全型依恋,20%的人表现为焦虑/矛盾型依恋,15%的人表现为逃避型依恋。多元logistic回归分析发现,矛盾依恋母亲的育儿压力水平显著高于安全型依恋母亲(优势比为2.4,95%可信区间为1.5,3.9),而回避依恋母亲的育儿压力水平不显著高于安全型依恋母亲(优势比为0.9,95%可信区间为0.5,1.6)。研究结果表明,焦虑型/矛盾型依恋类型比安全型依恋类型与更高水平的养育压力相关。因此,专家在提供育儿支持时,了解母亲的依恋类型是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Role of Dark Personality Traits in Embitterment–Jealousy Dynamics: Insights from a Multi-Scale Analysis and Moderation Effects Modifications to Enhance Outcomes of Family-Based Treatment for Anorexia Nervosa: A Scoping Review How Moral Distress Contributes to Depression Varies by Gender in a Sample of Sub-Saharan African Nurses Violence and Child Mental Health Outcomes in Iraq: Mapping Vulnerable Areas Tangram Puzzles in Patients with Neurocognitive Disorders: A Pilot Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1