A Brazilian cost-utility analysis of trabecular micro-bypass with iStent inject® for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma

R. A. P. Guedes, Camila Pepe Souza, L. L. Dias, L. Murta, D. Gravina, A. Chaoubah
{"title":"A Brazilian cost-utility analysis of trabecular micro-bypass with iStent inject® for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma","authors":"R. A. P. Guedes, Camila Pepe Souza, L. L. Dias, L. Murta, D. Gravina, A. Chaoubah","doi":"10.37039/1982.8551.20220049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate the cost-utility of the iStent inject ® for the treatment of mild-to-moderate open- angle glaucoma (OAG) within the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). Methods: A Markov model was developed, in which the effectiveness outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER: R$ / QALY quality-adjusted life-year). Direct medical costs were obtained from the SUS perspective. The base case comprised of a hypothetical cohort of patients with OAG using topical medication and being managed according to the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines (PCDT) and a real-world setting based on data from Datasus. The model’s robustness through sensitivity analyses was tested. Results: In the PCDT base case setting, the trabecular micro-bypass implant provided gains of 0.47 QALYs and an ICER of R$7,996.66/QALY compared to treatment with topical medication. In the real-world setting based on data from Datasus, the trabecular micro-bypass implant, provided gains of 0.47 QALYs and an ICER of R$4,485.68/QALY compared to treatment with topical medication. The results were robust to sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Incorporating iStent inject® to SUS provides an improvement in the patient’s quality of life with an additional cost that warrants the benefit provided to patients. Results may be considered cost-effective compared to topical medication.","PeriodicalId":49619,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Oftalmologia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Oftalmologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37039/1982.8551.20220049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the cost-utility of the iStent inject ® for the treatment of mild-to-moderate open- angle glaucoma (OAG) within the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). Methods: A Markov model was developed, in which the effectiveness outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER: R$ / QALY quality-adjusted life-year). Direct medical costs were obtained from the SUS perspective. The base case comprised of a hypothetical cohort of patients with OAG using topical medication and being managed according to the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines (PCDT) and a real-world setting based on data from Datasus. The model’s robustness through sensitivity analyses was tested. Results: In the PCDT base case setting, the trabecular micro-bypass implant provided gains of 0.47 QALYs and an ICER of R$7,996.66/QALY compared to treatment with topical medication. In the real-world setting based on data from Datasus, the trabecular micro-bypass implant, provided gains of 0.47 QALYs and an ICER of R$4,485.68/QALY compared to treatment with topical medication. The results were robust to sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Incorporating iStent inject® to SUS provides an improvement in the patient’s quality of life with an additional cost that warrants the benefit provided to patients. Results may be considered cost-effective compared to topical medication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西小梁微搭桥治疗开角型青光眼的成本-效用分析
目的:评估iStent注射液®在巴西统一卫生系统(SUS)中治疗轻至中度开角型青光眼(OAG)的成本-效用。方法:建立马尔科夫模型,以增量成本-效果比(ICER: R$ / QALY质量调整生命年)作为有效性指标。直接医疗费用是从单一系统角度获得的。基本案例包括一个假设的OAG患者队列,使用局部药物,并根据临床方案和治疗指南(PCDT)进行管理,以及基于Datasus数据的现实环境。通过敏感性分析检验了模型的稳健性。结果:在PCDT基础病例设置中,与局部药物治疗相比,小梁微旁路植入物提供了0.47 QALY的增益和7,996.66雷亚尔/QALY的ICER。根据Datasus的数据,在现实环境中,与局部药物治疗相比,小梁微旁路植入物提供了0.47 QALY的增益和4,485.68雷亚尔/QALY的ICER。结果对敏感性分析具有稳健性。结论:将iStent®注射到SUS中可以改善患者的生活质量,但额外的成本保证了为患者提供的益处。与局部用药相比,结果可能被认为具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Rev Bras Oftalmol.) - ISSN 0034-7280, publicação científica da Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia, se propõe a divulgar artigos que contribuam para o aperfeiçoamento e o desenvolvimento da prática, da pesquisa e do ensino da Oftalmologia e de especialidades afins. Todos os manuscritos, após aprovação pelos Editores serão avaliados por dois ou três revisores qualificados (peer review), sendo o anonimato garantido em todo o processo de julgamento.
期刊最新文献
The generation of innovative ophthalmologists Is it time to consider teleophthalmology as a game-changer in the management of diabetic retinopathy? Unexpectedly high corneal flap thickness and ectasia after mechanical LASIK Analysis of the thickness of conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery with the Moscovici dissection technique compared with manual dissection Terapia genética de injeção intravítrea de rAAV2-ND4 para neuropatia óptica hereditária de Leber: uma revisão sistemática
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1