P. Soares, J. Cruz, Celso Busnelo Moreno, Guilherme Novoa Colombo Barboza, Marcello Novoa Colombo Barboza, B. Moscovici
{"title":"Perfil epidemiológico e melhora visual após cirurgia de catarata realizada em hospital oftalmológico de referência em Santos","authors":"P. Soares, J. Cruz, Celso Busnelo Moreno, Guilherme Novoa Colombo Barboza, Marcello Novoa Colombo Barboza, B. Moscovici","doi":"10.37039/1982.8551.20230022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". ABSTRACT Objective: To identify the epidemiological profile and visual benefit of the patient using the Unified Health System after cataract surgery. Methods: This is a descriptive, cross-sectional and retrospective study with the analysis of medical records, between October and November 2020. We included 573 eyes of 319 patients that were selected for cataract surgery. Gender, age, cataract classification, pre-and post-surgery corrected acuity, smoking, presence of comorbidities, and previous ocular alterations were analyzed. Results: Of the cataract surgeries performed, the mean age was 70.5 years (±7.1%), with a prevalence of 57.1% (n=182) in women; 13.8% (n= 44) were smokers. Systemic arterial hypertension was the most recurrent comorbidity, present in 65.8% (n=210), and glaucoma was the most common ocular alteration in 57% (n=45) of the cases. As for cataract classification, nuclear cataract was manifested in 71.9% (n=412). Visual acuity was evaluated by the logMAR scale, and counting fingers and hand motion were given the value of 3. Mean visual acuity before surgery was 0.7 with an SD of 0.9 and, after surgery, of 0.1, with an SD of 0.3, which was statistically significant. Conclusion: Knowledge of the epidemiological profile and visual benefit","PeriodicalId":49619,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Oftalmologia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Oftalmologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37039/1982.8551.20230022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
. ABSTRACT Objective: To identify the epidemiological profile and visual benefit of the patient using the Unified Health System after cataract surgery. Methods: This is a descriptive, cross-sectional and retrospective study with the analysis of medical records, between October and November 2020. We included 573 eyes of 319 patients that were selected for cataract surgery. Gender, age, cataract classification, pre-and post-surgery corrected acuity, smoking, presence of comorbidities, and previous ocular alterations were analyzed. Results: Of the cataract surgeries performed, the mean age was 70.5 years (±7.1%), with a prevalence of 57.1% (n=182) in women; 13.8% (n= 44) were smokers. Systemic arterial hypertension was the most recurrent comorbidity, present in 65.8% (n=210), and glaucoma was the most common ocular alteration in 57% (n=45) of the cases. As for cataract classification, nuclear cataract was manifested in 71.9% (n=412). Visual acuity was evaluated by the logMAR scale, and counting fingers and hand motion were given the value of 3. Mean visual acuity before surgery was 0.7 with an SD of 0.9 and, after surgery, of 0.1, with an SD of 0.3, which was statistically significant. Conclusion: Knowledge of the epidemiological profile and visual benefit
期刊介绍:
A Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Rev Bras Oftalmol.) - ISSN 0034-7280, publicação científica da Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia, se propõe a divulgar artigos que contribuam para o aperfeiçoamento e o desenvolvimento da prática, da pesquisa e do ensino da Oftalmologia e de especialidades afins. Todos os manuscritos, após aprovação pelos Editores serão avaliados por dois ou três revisores qualificados (peer review), sendo o anonimato garantido em todo o processo de julgamento.