Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Risk of Miscarriage

IF 1.1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Reproductive medicine (Basel, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2023-01-09 DOI:10.3390/reprodmed4010001
J. Larson, M. Bazalakova, A. Godecker, L. Cooney, M. Delbeccaro, K. Aagaard, K. Antony
{"title":"Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Risk of Miscarriage","authors":"J. Larson, M. Bazalakova, A. Godecker, L. Cooney, M. Delbeccaro, K. Aagaard, K. Antony","doi":"10.3390/reprodmed4010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this project was to evaluate whether screening positive on obstructive sleep apnea questionnaires in the first trimester of pregnancy was associated with miscarriage. This was a secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort study of participants who were screened for sleep apnea during pregnancy with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Berlin Questionnaire, and novel items related to sleep and napping. This secondary analysis was IRB exempt. Our primary outcome was miscarriage in the index pregnancy. An association between responses to the sleep apnea screening questions with miscarriage of the index pregnancy was queried via Poisson regression. We found that gravidae who had elevated scores on both the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the Berlin Questionnaire were more likely to experience miscarriage than those who had elevated scores on only one questionnaire or neither (p = 0.018). Gravidae who reported snoring (p = 0.042) or hypertension (p = 0.013) in the first trimester were more likely to experience miscarriage than gravidae who did not. Gravidae who reported napping in the first trimester were less likely to experience miscarriage (p = 0.045), even after adjusting for confounding variables (p = 0.007). In conclusion, we found that screening positive on both the Berlin Questionnaire and Epworth Sleepiness Scale was statistically significantly associated with miscarriage prior to adjustment for confounding variables, as did snoring and hypertension. After adjusting for confounding variables, only not napping was associated with miscarriage. Given the small sample size, further investigation into this topic is warranted.","PeriodicalId":74668,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive medicine (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive medicine (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed4010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this project was to evaluate whether screening positive on obstructive sleep apnea questionnaires in the first trimester of pregnancy was associated with miscarriage. This was a secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort study of participants who were screened for sleep apnea during pregnancy with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Berlin Questionnaire, and novel items related to sleep and napping. This secondary analysis was IRB exempt. Our primary outcome was miscarriage in the index pregnancy. An association between responses to the sleep apnea screening questions with miscarriage of the index pregnancy was queried via Poisson regression. We found that gravidae who had elevated scores on both the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the Berlin Questionnaire were more likely to experience miscarriage than those who had elevated scores on only one questionnaire or neither (p = 0.018). Gravidae who reported snoring (p = 0.042) or hypertension (p = 0.013) in the first trimester were more likely to experience miscarriage than gravidae who did not. Gravidae who reported napping in the first trimester were less likely to experience miscarriage (p = 0.045), even after adjusting for confounding variables (p = 0.007). In conclusion, we found that screening positive on both the Berlin Questionnaire and Epworth Sleepiness Scale was statistically significantly associated with miscarriage prior to adjustment for confounding variables, as did snoring and hypertension. After adjusting for confounding variables, only not napping was associated with miscarriage. Given the small sample size, further investigation into this topic is warranted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停和流产风险
该项目的目的是评估在怀孕前三个月的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停问卷中筛查阳性是否与流产有关。这是对一项前瞻性观察队列研究的二次分析,该研究的参与者在怀孕期间使用Epworth嗜睡量表、柏林问卷和与睡眠和午睡相关的新项目进行了睡眠呼吸暂停筛查。这个二次分析是IRB豁免的。我们的主要结局是指数妊娠流产。对睡眠呼吸暂停筛查问题的回答与指数妊娠流产之间的关系通过泊松回归进行了查询。我们发现,在爱普沃斯嗜睡量表和柏林问卷中得分较高的孕妇比那些只在一项问卷中得分较高或两项都没有得分的孕妇更容易流产(p = 0.018)。在妊娠早期有打鼾(p = 0.042)或高血压(p = 0.013)的孕妇比没有打鼾或高血压的孕妇更容易流产。即使在调整了混杂变量后(p = 0.007),报告在妊娠早期午睡的孕妇流产的可能性更小(p = 0.045)。综上所述,我们发现在调整混杂变量之前,Berlin问卷和Epworth嗜睡量表的筛查阳性与流产有统计学显著相关,打鼾和高血压也是如此。在调整了混杂变量后,只有不午睡与流产有关。由于样本量较小,因此有必要对该主题进行进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prenatal Evaluation of a Fetal Cystic Hygroma: An Unexpected Finding of a De Novo Fetal BRCA1 Deletion Case Report Can We Safely Decrease Early-Term Delivery and Cesarean Section Rate in Pregnancies Complicated by Fetal Transposition of Great Arteries? Recent Developments in In Vitro Spermatogenesis and Future Directions Special Issue Featuring Papers for Celebrating the Third Year since the Founding of Reproductive Medicine Relationship between Ovarian Reserve Markers and Body Mass Index in Infertile Women with and without Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Retrospective Case–Control Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1