Retrospective Analysis of Testicular Germ Cell Tumor Patients with Brain Metastases: A Single-Center Experience

M. Aykan, G. Yıldıran, R. Acar, Nazlıcan İğret, B. Yıldız, İ. Ertürk, N. Karadurmuş
{"title":"Retrospective Analysis of Testicular Germ Cell Tumor Patients with Brain Metastases: A Single-Center Experience","authors":"M. Aykan, G. Yıldıran, R. Acar, Nazlıcan İğret, B. Yıldız, İ. Ertürk, N. Karadurmuş","doi":"10.37047/jos.2021-87403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"study, patients with relapsed or refractory GCT and BM were evaluated. The characteristic clinical features of the patients, their systemic treatments, local treatments applied to BM, and follow-up periods were recorded. The primary endpoint was to assess survival after detection of synchronous and metachronous BM. The secondary endpoint was determined as overall survival (OS). Results: Twenty-five patients were included in this study with median age and interquartile range (IQR) of 30.24 and 7.92, respectively. Stage IIIC was detected at first diagnosis in 72% of the patients. The most commonly used local BM treatment was the combination of surgery and radiotherapy (60%). The objective response rate (complete response plus partial response) after local BM treatment was 60%. The median OS in the whole group was 24.75 (IQR: 25.97) months. The median OS (IQR) in the synchronous BM group was significantly different than that in the metachronous BM group [33.51 (18.13) vs. 9.97 (7.52), 95% confidence interval of 6.7 to 40.3 months, p=0.013]. There was no difference in the median OS between the groups [median (IQR)=36.39 (25.35) months vs. 23.70 (35.68) months, p=0.672]. Conclusion: The patients with GCTs presenting with BM during diagnosis were in a better condition than those who developed BM at relapse. However, no significant difference was found in OS. This may indicate shorter survival times for the patients who relapse, as the tumor is resistant to systemic therapy.","PeriodicalId":31838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncological Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37047/jos.2021-87403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

study, patients with relapsed or refractory GCT and BM were evaluated. The characteristic clinical features of the patients, their systemic treatments, local treatments applied to BM, and follow-up periods were recorded. The primary endpoint was to assess survival after detection of synchronous and metachronous BM. The secondary endpoint was determined as overall survival (OS). Results: Twenty-five patients were included in this study with median age and interquartile range (IQR) of 30.24 and 7.92, respectively. Stage IIIC was detected at first diagnosis in 72% of the patients. The most commonly used local BM treatment was the combination of surgery and radiotherapy (60%). The objective response rate (complete response plus partial response) after local BM treatment was 60%. The median OS in the whole group was 24.75 (IQR: 25.97) months. The median OS (IQR) in the synchronous BM group was significantly different than that in the metachronous BM group [33.51 (18.13) vs. 9.97 (7.52), 95% confidence interval of 6.7 to 40.3 months, p=0.013]. There was no difference in the median OS between the groups [median (IQR)=36.39 (25.35) months vs. 23.70 (35.68) months, p=0.672]. Conclusion: The patients with GCTs presenting with BM during diagnosis were in a better condition than those who developed BM at relapse. However, no significant difference was found in OS. This may indicate shorter survival times for the patients who relapse, as the tumor is resistant to systemic therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
睾丸生殖细胞瘤合并脑转移的回顾性分析:单中心经验
研究中,对复发或难治性GCT和BM患者进行评估。记录患者的临床特点、全身治疗、局部治疗及随访时间。主要终点是评估同步和异时性脑转移后的生存率。次要终点确定为总生存期(OS)。结果:本研究纳入25例患者,中位年龄30.24,四分位间距(IQR) 7.92。72%的患者在首次诊断时就发现了IIIC期。最常用的局部脑转移治疗是手术和放疗联合治疗(60%)。局部脑脊髓炎治疗后的客观缓解率(完全缓解+部分缓解)为60%。全组中位OS为24.75 (IQR: 25.97)个月。同步BM组的中位OS (IQR)与非同步BM组有显著差异[33.51(18.13)比9.97(7.52),95%可信区间为6.7 ~ 40.3个月,p=0.013]。两组间中位OS差异无统计学意义[中位(IQR)=36.39(25.35)个月vs. 23.70(35.68)个月,p=0.672]。结论:gct患者在诊断时出现脑转移的情况优于复发时出现脑转移的患者。然而,在操作系统中没有发现显著差异。这可能表明复发患者的生存时间较短,因为肿瘤对全身治疗有抵抗力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Novel Tumor Marker for Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (+) Lymphoma: Beta-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Initial Albumin-Bilirubin Grade as a Prognostic Indicator of Pancreatic Cancer with Liver Metastasis Investigation of a Glioblastoma Risk-Associated SNP of the PTPRB Gene in Familial Glioblastoma Lung Carcinoma Developing Afatinib-Associated Skin Reactions Immunotherapy for Lung Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1