U. Disel, F. Köse, A. Bilici, M. Özgüroğlu, S. Saglam, M. Seker, S. Aksoy, I. Tek, N. Mandel, G. Demir, Ç. Arslan, M. Demiray, M. Öztürk, T. Salepçi, Y. Eralp, F. Selçukbiricik, Gokce Temizas, E. Fidan
{"title":"The Impact of Hybrid Capture-Based Comprehensive Genomic Profiling on Treatment Strategies in Patients with Solid Tumors","authors":"U. Disel, F. Köse, A. Bilici, M. Özgüroğlu, S. Saglam, M. Seker, S. Aksoy, I. Tek, N. Mandel, G. Demir, Ç. Arslan, M. Demiray, M. Öztürk, T. Salepçi, Y. Eralp, F. Selçukbiricik, Gokce Temizas, E. Fidan","doi":"10.37047/jos.2022-89310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABS TRACT Objective: The development of bioinformatics and comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has provided insights into the ap- plicability and functionality of the genomic alterations (GA). In this study, we evaluated the impact of CGP on the treatment plan and outcomes in a significant number of patients. Material and Methods: We carried out a retrospective case-control study on 164 adult patients with advanced solid tumors from 15 oncology centers in Türkiye. Results : In all cases, CGP was performed within 23.8 [standard deviation (SD)±32.1] months of initial diagnosis. Non-small cell lung carcinoma, breast cancer, unknown primary carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, and sarcoma were among the most common tumor types, accounting for 61.5% of all cases. CGP was performed immediately after the diagnosis of advanced cancer in 13 patients (7.9%). In 158 patients (96.4%), at least one GA was found as per the CGP report. Also, in the reports, the average tumor mutational burden (TMB) and GAs were 7.3 (SD±8.7) mut/Mb and 3.5 (SD±2.0), respectively. According to CGP reports, 58 patients had 79 evidence-based drug suggestions for their particular tumor type, whereas 97 patients had 153 evidence-based drug suggestions for another tumor type. After the primary oncologist interpreted the CGP reports, significant changes were made to the treatment of 35 (21.3%) patients. Conclusion: We strongly believe that in the future, high-TMB or other tumor-agnostic biomarkers will become much more afford- able, and CGP will serve as one of the major decision-making tools for the treatment of patients along with pathological, radiological or laboratory tests.","PeriodicalId":31838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncological Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37047/jos.2022-89310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABS TRACT Objective: The development of bioinformatics and comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has provided insights into the ap- plicability and functionality of the genomic alterations (GA). In this study, we evaluated the impact of CGP on the treatment plan and outcomes in a significant number of patients. Material and Methods: We carried out a retrospective case-control study on 164 adult patients with advanced solid tumors from 15 oncology centers in Türkiye. Results : In all cases, CGP was performed within 23.8 [standard deviation (SD)±32.1] months of initial diagnosis. Non-small cell lung carcinoma, breast cancer, unknown primary carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, and sarcoma were among the most common tumor types, accounting for 61.5% of all cases. CGP was performed immediately after the diagnosis of advanced cancer in 13 patients (7.9%). In 158 patients (96.4%), at least one GA was found as per the CGP report. Also, in the reports, the average tumor mutational burden (TMB) and GAs were 7.3 (SD±8.7) mut/Mb and 3.5 (SD±2.0), respectively. According to CGP reports, 58 patients had 79 evidence-based drug suggestions for their particular tumor type, whereas 97 patients had 153 evidence-based drug suggestions for another tumor type. After the primary oncologist interpreted the CGP reports, significant changes were made to the treatment of 35 (21.3%) patients. Conclusion: We strongly believe that in the future, high-TMB or other tumor-agnostic biomarkers will become much more afford- able, and CGP will serve as one of the major decision-making tools for the treatment of patients along with pathological, radiological or laboratory tests.