The Impact of Hybrid Capture-Based Comprehensive Genomic Profiling on Treatment Strategies in Patients with Solid Tumors

U. Disel, F. Köse, A. Bilici, M. Özgüroğlu, S. Saglam, M. Seker, S. Aksoy, I. Tek, N. Mandel, G. Demir, Ç. Arslan, M. Demiray, M. Öztürk, T. Salepçi, Y. Eralp, F. Selçukbiricik, Gokce Temizas, E. Fidan
{"title":"The Impact of Hybrid Capture-Based Comprehensive Genomic Profiling on Treatment Strategies in Patients with Solid Tumors","authors":"U. Disel, F. Köse, A. Bilici, M. Özgüroğlu, S. Saglam, M. Seker, S. Aksoy, I. Tek, N. Mandel, G. Demir, Ç. Arslan, M. Demiray, M. Öztürk, T. Salepçi, Y. Eralp, F. Selçukbiricik, Gokce Temizas, E. Fidan","doi":"10.37047/jos.2022-89310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABS TRACT Objective: The development of bioinformatics and comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has provided insights into the ap- plicability and functionality of the genomic alterations (GA). In this study, we evaluated the impact of CGP on the treatment plan and outcomes in a significant number of patients. Material and Methods: We carried out a retrospective case-control study on 164 adult patients with advanced solid tumors from 15 oncology centers in Türkiye. Results : In all cases, CGP was performed within 23.8 [standard deviation (SD)±32.1] months of initial diagnosis. Non-small cell lung carcinoma, breast cancer, unknown primary carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, and sarcoma were among the most common tumor types, accounting for 61.5% of all cases. CGP was performed immediately after the diagnosis of advanced cancer in 13 patients (7.9%). In 158 patients (96.4%), at least one GA was found as per the CGP report. Also, in the reports, the average tumor mutational burden (TMB) and GAs were 7.3 (SD±8.7) mut/Mb and 3.5 (SD±2.0), respectively. According to CGP reports, 58 patients had 79 evidence-based drug suggestions for their particular tumor type, whereas 97 patients had 153 evidence-based drug suggestions for another tumor type. After the primary oncologist interpreted the CGP reports, significant changes were made to the treatment of 35 (21.3%) patients. Conclusion: We strongly believe that in the future, high-TMB or other tumor-agnostic biomarkers will become much more afford- able, and CGP will serve as one of the major decision-making tools for the treatment of patients along with pathological, radiological or laboratory tests.","PeriodicalId":31838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncological Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37047/jos.2022-89310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABS TRACT Objective: The development of bioinformatics and comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has provided insights into the ap- plicability and functionality of the genomic alterations (GA). In this study, we evaluated the impact of CGP on the treatment plan and outcomes in a significant number of patients. Material and Methods: We carried out a retrospective case-control study on 164 adult patients with advanced solid tumors from 15 oncology centers in Türkiye. Results : In all cases, CGP was performed within 23.8 [standard deviation (SD)±32.1] months of initial diagnosis. Non-small cell lung carcinoma, breast cancer, unknown primary carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, and sarcoma were among the most common tumor types, accounting for 61.5% of all cases. CGP was performed immediately after the diagnosis of advanced cancer in 13 patients (7.9%). In 158 patients (96.4%), at least one GA was found as per the CGP report. Also, in the reports, the average tumor mutational burden (TMB) and GAs were 7.3 (SD±8.7) mut/Mb and 3.5 (SD±2.0), respectively. According to CGP reports, 58 patients had 79 evidence-based drug suggestions for their particular tumor type, whereas 97 patients had 153 evidence-based drug suggestions for another tumor type. After the primary oncologist interpreted the CGP reports, significant changes were made to the treatment of 35 (21.3%) patients. Conclusion: We strongly believe that in the future, high-TMB or other tumor-agnostic biomarkers will become much more afford- able, and CGP will serve as one of the major decision-making tools for the treatment of patients along with pathological, radiological or laboratory tests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于混合捕获的综合基因组图谱对实体瘤患者治疗策略的影响
目的:生物信息学和综合基因组图谱(CGP)的发展为基因组改变(GA)的适用性和功能性提供了新的见解。在这项研究中,我们评估了CGP对大量患者的治疗计划和结果的影响。材料和方法:我们对来自日本15个肿瘤中心的164名成年晚期实体瘤患者进行了回顾性病例对照研究。结果:所有病例均在首次诊断后23.8[标准差(SD)±32.1]个月内进行CGP。非小细胞肺癌、乳腺癌、未知原发癌、结直肠癌和肉瘤是最常见的肿瘤类型,占所有病例的61.5%。13例(7.9%)患者在诊断为晚期癌症后立即行CGP。根据CGP报告,158例患者(96.4%)中至少发现1例GA。此外,在报告中,平均肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)和GAs分别为7.3 (SD±8.7)mut/Mb和3.5 (SD±2.0)。根据CGP报告,58例患者对其特定肿瘤类型有79项循证药物建议,而97例患者对其他肿瘤类型有153项循证药物建议。在初级肿瘤学家解释CGP报告后,35例(21.3%)患者的治疗发生了重大变化。结论:我们坚信,在未来,高tmb或其他肿瘤不可知的生物标志物将变得更加实惠,而CGP将与病理、放射或实验室检查一起成为患者治疗的主要决策工具之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Novel Tumor Marker for Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (+) Lymphoma: Beta-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Initial Albumin-Bilirubin Grade as a Prognostic Indicator of Pancreatic Cancer with Liver Metastasis Investigation of a Glioblastoma Risk-Associated SNP of the PTPRB Gene in Familial Glioblastoma Lung Carcinoma Developing Afatinib-Associated Skin Reactions Immunotherapy for Lung Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1