The Specifics of the Formation of Think Tanks’ System in Asia (the Case of Japan) and Australia

Ihor Petrenko, V. Filipchuk
{"title":"The Specifics of the Formation of Think Tanks’ System in Asia (the Case of Japan) and Australia","authors":"Ihor Petrenko, V. Filipchuk","doi":"10.29202/up/7/6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the analysis of the specifics of the formation of a think tanks’ system in Asia (the case of Japan) and Australia. It is noted that Japanese think tanks increase their influence on public policy and important public decisions. Initiators and sponsors of think tanks — enterprises, foundations, government agencies, local governments, political parties and individuals. In general, a network of competing think tanks is being formed. It is argued that Australia’s think tanks occupy a specific niche in the country’s political system and help the government to develop a balanced and optimal public policy in all spheres of public life. It is pointed out that the dominant types of think tanks in Australia are autonomous and independent, quasi-independent and university. The emergence of Australian think tanks is generally in line with the global dynamics of growth in the number of think tanks.","PeriodicalId":52964,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Policymaker","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Policymaker","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29202/up/7/6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article deals with the analysis of the specifics of the formation of a think tanks’ system in Asia (the case of Japan) and Australia. It is noted that Japanese think tanks increase their influence on public policy and important public decisions. Initiators and sponsors of think tanks — enterprises, foundations, government agencies, local governments, political parties and individuals. In general, a network of competing think tanks is being formed. It is argued that Australia’s think tanks occupy a specific niche in the country’s political system and help the government to develop a balanced and optimal public policy in all spheres of public life. It is pointed out that the dominant types of think tanks in Australia are autonomous and independent, quasi-independent and university. The emergence of Australian think tanks is generally in line with the global dynamics of growth in the number of think tanks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚洲(以日本为例)和澳大利亚智库体系形成的具体情况
本文以亚洲(日本)和澳大利亚为例,分析了智库体系形成的具体情况。委员会注意到,日本智库对公共政策和重要公共决策的影响越来越大。智库的发起者和赞助者——企业、基金会、政府机构、地方政府、政党和个人。总的来说,一个相互竞争的智库网络正在形成。有人认为,澳大利亚的智库在该国的政治体系中占有特定的地位,并帮助政府在公共生活的各个领域制定平衡和最佳的公共政策。指出澳大利亚智库的主要类型是自治独立、准独立和大学型。澳大利亚智库的出现总体上符合全球智库数量增长的动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Security of the Post-Soviet Space, Intelligence and Counter-Intelligence aspects. Part I: Kazakhstan Post-Soviet Stages of Ukraine’s Party System Development (1989-2013) Identity Politics of Migrants Worldview Transformation of Personality as Problem of Identity Formation in the Information Age Information Society as a Network-Communicative Space of Socialization of Modern Human Being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1