Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts Overall Survival Better than Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in Patients with Metastatic Gastric Cancer

Sümeyye Teki̇n, A. Tatlı, Sema Sezgin Göksu, H. Coşkun
{"title":"Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts Overall Survival Better than Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in Patients with Metastatic Gastric Cancer","authors":"Sümeyye Teki̇n, A. Tatlı, Sema Sezgin Göksu, H. Coşkun","doi":"10.37047/jos.2023-96450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"seen in patients with gastrointestinal system cancer; affects prognosis, quality of life, and survival. In this study, the prognostic value of the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) based on malnutrition and systemic inflammatory response were compared to determine which index was more predictive for survival. Material and Methods: A total of 124 patients were included in the study. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS program. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Log-Rank test were used for survival analysis. Factors affecting overall survival (OS) were analyzed with univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. The values of the indices in predicting the cutoff point and OS were recorded by calculating area under the curve by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: In univariate analysis; primary tumor location at the cardioesophageal junction, increased CRP, decreased lymphocyte count, and low PNI ( ≤ 44.05) significantly decreased OS (p<0.05). Only the primary tumor location at the car-dioesophageal junction was an independent prognostic factor for mortality (hazard ratio: 2.717; 95% confidence interval: 1.292-5.711; p=0.008). Conclusion: Although PNI is not an independent risk factor for OS in patients with metastatic gastric cancer, it can be an indicator of survival. In addition, PNI was found to be a better prognostic marker in predicting OS than GNRI.","PeriodicalId":31838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncological Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37047/jos.2023-96450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

seen in patients with gastrointestinal system cancer; affects prognosis, quality of life, and survival. In this study, the prognostic value of the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) based on malnutrition and systemic inflammatory response were compared to determine which index was more predictive for survival. Material and Methods: A total of 124 patients were included in the study. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS program. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Log-Rank test were used for survival analysis. Factors affecting overall survival (OS) were analyzed with univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. The values of the indices in predicting the cutoff point and OS were recorded by calculating area under the curve by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: In univariate analysis; primary tumor location at the cardioesophageal junction, increased CRP, decreased lymphocyte count, and low PNI ( ≤ 44.05) significantly decreased OS (p<0.05). Only the primary tumor location at the car-dioesophageal junction was an independent prognostic factor for mortality (hazard ratio: 2.717; 95% confidence interval: 1.292-5.711; p=0.008). Conclusion: Although PNI is not an independent risk factor for OS in patients with metastatic gastric cancer, it can be an indicator of survival. In addition, PNI was found to be a better prognostic marker in predicting OS than GNRI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预后营养指数比老年营养风险指数更能预测转移性胃癌患者的总生存期
见于胃肠道系统癌症患者;影响预后、生活质量和生存。在这项研究中,我们比较了基于营养不良和全身炎症反应的预后营养指数(PNI)和老年营养风险指数(GNRI)的预后价值,以确定哪个指数更能预测生存。材料与方法:共纳入124例患者。采用SPSS软件进行统计分析。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier分析和Log-Rank检验。采用单因素和多因素Cox回归分析影响总生存期(OS)的因素。通过患者工作特征分析计算曲线下面积,记录预测截止点和OS的指标值。结果:单因素分析;原发肿瘤位于心食道交界处、CRP升高、淋巴细胞计数降低、PNI低(≤44.05)显著降低OS (p<0.05)。只有贲门-食管交界处的原发肿瘤位置是死亡率的独立预后因素(危险比:2.717;95%置信区间:1.292-5.711;p = 0.008)。结论:虽然PNI不是转移性胃癌患者发生OS的独立危险因素,但它可以作为生存的一个指标。此外,与GNRI相比,PNI是一个更好的预测OS的预后指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Novel Tumor Marker for Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (+) Lymphoma: Beta-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Initial Albumin-Bilirubin Grade as a Prognostic Indicator of Pancreatic Cancer with Liver Metastasis Investigation of a Glioblastoma Risk-Associated SNP of the PTPRB Gene in Familial Glioblastoma Lung Carcinoma Developing Afatinib-Associated Skin Reactions Immunotherapy for Lung Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1