Child Healthcare Decision-Making: Examining "Conjointness" in Paternal Identities among Residential and Non-Residential Fathers

Fathering Pub Date : 2010-01-01 DOI:10.3149/FTH.0801.109
Anthony Isacco, C. Garfield
{"title":"Child Healthcare Decision-Making: Examining \"Conjointness\" in Paternal Identities among Residential and Non-Residential Fathers","authors":"Anthony Isacco, C. Garfield","doi":"10.3149/FTH.0801.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the paternal identity conjointness of seventeen residential and fourteen non-residential fathers within five, normative healthcare decisions. Using consensual qualitative research (CQR) methodology to investigate fathers’ usage of parenting voice (I or We), we examined how paternal identity conjointness was similar and different between residential and non-residential fathers in each healthcare decision. Results revealed two new paternal identities, “self-as-detached” and “mixed.” Residential fathers expressed a self-as-co-parental identity in three of the five healthcare decisions, but shifted to a self-as-solo identity when deciding if their child would be circumcised. Non-residential fathers constructed a self-as-co-parental identity in two healthcare decisions while also expressing a self-as-detached identity and mixed identity in other healthcare decisions. Contextual and relational influences on paternal identity conjointness are identified. Implications of our findings for future research and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":88482,"journal":{"name":"Fathering","volume":"8 1","pages":"109-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3149/FTH.0801.109","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fathering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3149/FTH.0801.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

This study examines the paternal identity conjointness of seventeen residential and fourteen non-residential fathers within five, normative healthcare decisions. Using consensual qualitative research (CQR) methodology to investigate fathers’ usage of parenting voice (I or We), we examined how paternal identity conjointness was similar and different between residential and non-residential fathers in each healthcare decision. Results revealed two new paternal identities, “self-as-detached” and “mixed.” Residential fathers expressed a self-as-co-parental identity in three of the five healthcare decisions, but shifted to a self-as-solo identity when deciding if their child would be circumcised. Non-residential fathers constructed a self-as-co-parental identity in two healthcare decisions while also expressing a self-as-detached identity and mixed identity in other healthcare decisions. Contextual and relational influences on paternal identity conjointness are identified. Implications of our findings for future research and practice are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童保健决策:居住与非居住父亲身份的“联合性”检验
本研究考察了在5个规范的医疗保健决策中,17个居住父亲和14个非居住父亲的父亲身份联合性。采用协商一致的定性研究(CQR)方法来调查父亲对育儿声音(I或We)的使用,我们研究了在每个医疗保健决策中,居住父亲和非居住父亲之间的父亲身份一致性是如何相似和不同的。结果显示了两种新的父亲身份,“超然自我”和“混合型”。住院父亲在五个医疗保健决定中有三个表达了自己作为共同父母的身份,但在决定他们的孩子是否要割包皮时转向了自我作为单独父母的身份。非居住父亲在两种医疗决策中构建了自我作为共同父母的身份,同时在其他医疗决策中也表达了自我作为分离的身份和混合的身份。语境和关系对父亲身份联结的影响是确定的。讨论了本研究结果对未来研究和实践的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cyber Dads: What Are Fathers Doing Online? Down Syndrome and Fathering: An Exploration of Ambiguous Loss Fatherhood in St. Kitts: Patterns and Predictors of Partnership and Paternal Dynamics in a Caribbean Island Mind the Gap: The expectation and reality of involved fatherhood What Matters Most? Money, Relationships, and Visions of Masculinity as Key Correlates of Father Involvement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1