New Observations on How Fathers Work and Care: Introduction to the Special Issue-Men, Work and Parenting-Part 1

Fathering Pub Date : 2010-09-01 DOI:10.3149/FTH.0803.271
L. Haas, M. O'Brien
{"title":"New Observations on How Fathers Work and Care: Introduction to the Special Issue-Men, Work and Parenting-Part 1","authors":"L. Haas, M. O'Brien","doi":"10.3149/FTH.0803.271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue highlights an area that is getting increased research attention-men, work and parenting. Once mothers entered the labor market in record numbers in industrialized societies in the 1960s, a substantial number of scholars began to study mothers' labor force participation--a phenomenon widely considered to be one of the most significant social developments of the 20th century. Important research topics have included work-family conflict, workplace and government policies that support working mothers, the division of labor for housework and child care among dual-earner couples, and the motherhood wage penalty. This research has been pioneering because it has dared to examine the linkages between two primary social institutions--the family and the labor market--that have usually been studied as separate rather than interlinked social systems. To a large extent, however, our knowledge about mothers' employment, its determinants and consequences, has stalled. This is because men's relationship to work and family life has been much less investigated. A basic tenet of gender theory is that gender is relational; that is, social definitions of femininity and masculinity are so intertwined that one cannot change much without the other changing at the same time. We therefore cannot really understand or improve the position of women in the family and in the labor market unless men's relation to work and family life is also well-researched and understood. The papers in this special issue contribute to that important goal. The papers in this special issue contribute to our understanding of men, work and parenting in several specific ways. First, the papers in this issue draw our attention to the contributions research can make when researchers analyze men, work and parenting in different social settings. Four nations get coverage in these papers--Canada, Norway, the UK, and the U.S. These nations vary considerably in how much they support working fathers. For example, Norway and Canada offer the most paid parental leave to fathers, while the UK offers little and the U.S. offers none at all. Kaufman and colleagues directly compare fathers' experience with taking leave at childbirth in the UK, where men have a modest statutory right to paternity leave, with men's experiences in the U.S., where men have no such right. Research makes a major contribution when it aims to be comparative; we learn substantially more about a particular social setting when we can compare and contrast it to another. The second contribution to scholarship that these papers make relates to methodology. While many areas of social science are dominated by one type of methodology, the new research stream on fatherhood tends to provide us with information that has been collected in various ways, and this is true for the papers in this issue. Four of the six studies rely upon analysis of in-depth interviews, a qualitative method that offers us rich description. McKay and Doucet conducted joint interviews with couples, instead of just fathers, in order to study more closely how couples negotiate the amount of parental leave fathers should take. Kaufman and colleagues describe for us how men without strong statutory rights to parental leave piece together a short but meaningful time off from work in order to be with their newborns. Two of the qualitative studies were also longitudinal in nature, a method that offers unique insight into the process of men's reconciliation of work and parenthood. Miller's study of UK fathers analyzes men's adaptation to fatherhood before and after childbirth. She found that time at home after childbirth helped men to gain important care-giving skills, but because UK paternity leave is so short (two weeks), men are forced to quickly return to paid work which reinforced gendered family practices. Bj0rnholt's paper analyzes the results of a unique follow-up study of Norwegian fathers who shared childcare with mothers in the 1970s. …","PeriodicalId":88482,"journal":{"name":"Fathering","volume":"8 1","pages":"271-275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3149/FTH.0803.271","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fathering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3149/FTH.0803.271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

This special issue highlights an area that is getting increased research attention-men, work and parenting. Once mothers entered the labor market in record numbers in industrialized societies in the 1960s, a substantial number of scholars began to study mothers' labor force participation--a phenomenon widely considered to be one of the most significant social developments of the 20th century. Important research topics have included work-family conflict, workplace and government policies that support working mothers, the division of labor for housework and child care among dual-earner couples, and the motherhood wage penalty. This research has been pioneering because it has dared to examine the linkages between two primary social institutions--the family and the labor market--that have usually been studied as separate rather than interlinked social systems. To a large extent, however, our knowledge about mothers' employment, its determinants and consequences, has stalled. This is because men's relationship to work and family life has been much less investigated. A basic tenet of gender theory is that gender is relational; that is, social definitions of femininity and masculinity are so intertwined that one cannot change much without the other changing at the same time. We therefore cannot really understand or improve the position of women in the family and in the labor market unless men's relation to work and family life is also well-researched and understood. The papers in this special issue contribute to that important goal. The papers in this special issue contribute to our understanding of men, work and parenting in several specific ways. First, the papers in this issue draw our attention to the contributions research can make when researchers analyze men, work and parenting in different social settings. Four nations get coverage in these papers--Canada, Norway, the UK, and the U.S. These nations vary considerably in how much they support working fathers. For example, Norway and Canada offer the most paid parental leave to fathers, while the UK offers little and the U.S. offers none at all. Kaufman and colleagues directly compare fathers' experience with taking leave at childbirth in the UK, where men have a modest statutory right to paternity leave, with men's experiences in the U.S., where men have no such right. Research makes a major contribution when it aims to be comparative; we learn substantially more about a particular social setting when we can compare and contrast it to another. The second contribution to scholarship that these papers make relates to methodology. While many areas of social science are dominated by one type of methodology, the new research stream on fatherhood tends to provide us with information that has been collected in various ways, and this is true for the papers in this issue. Four of the six studies rely upon analysis of in-depth interviews, a qualitative method that offers us rich description. McKay and Doucet conducted joint interviews with couples, instead of just fathers, in order to study more closely how couples negotiate the amount of parental leave fathers should take. Kaufman and colleagues describe for us how men without strong statutory rights to parental leave piece together a short but meaningful time off from work in order to be with their newborns. Two of the qualitative studies were also longitudinal in nature, a method that offers unique insight into the process of men's reconciliation of work and parenthood. Miller's study of UK fathers analyzes men's adaptation to fatherhood before and after childbirth. She found that time at home after childbirth helped men to gain important care-giving skills, but because UK paternity leave is so short (two weeks), men are forced to quickly return to paid work which reinforced gendered family practices. Bj0rnholt's paper analyzes the results of a unique follow-up study of Norwegian fathers who shared childcare with mothers in the 1970s. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于父亲如何工作和照顾孩子的新观察:特刊导论——男人、工作和养育——第一部分
这期特刊突出了一个越来越受到研究关注的领域——男性、工作和养育子女。20世纪60年代,工业化社会中母亲进入劳动力市场的人数创下了历史记录,此后,大量学者开始研究母亲的劳动力参与情况——这一现象被广泛认为是20世纪最重要的社会发展之一。重要的研究课题包括工作-家庭冲突、支持职业母亲的工作场所和政府政策、双职工家庭之间家务劳动和照顾孩子的分工以及母亲的工资惩罚。这项研究具有开创性,因为它敢于研究两个主要社会机构——家庭和劳动力市场——之间的联系,这两个社会机构通常被视为独立的,而不是相互联系的社会系统。然而,在很大程度上,我们对母亲就业及其决定因素和后果的认识停滞不前。这是因为人们对男性与工作和家庭生活的关系的调查要少得多。性别理论的一个基本原则是性别是关系的;也就是说,社会对女性气质和男性气质的定义是如此纠缠在一起,以至于如果一个人不同时改变另一个人,另一个人就不会改变太多。因此,我们不能真正理解或改善妇女在家庭和劳动力市场中的地位,除非对男子与工作和家庭生活的关系也进行充分的研究和了解。本期特刊中的论文有助于实现这一重要目标。本期特刊中的论文从几个具体方面帮助我们理解了男人、工作和养育子女。首先,本期的论文让我们注意到,当研究人员分析不同社会背景下的男性、工作和养育子女时,研究可以做出的贡献。这些报纸报道了四个国家——加拿大、挪威、英国和美国。这些国家对在职父亲的支持程度差异很大。例如,挪威和加拿大为父亲提供的带薪育儿假最多,而英国几乎没有,美国根本没有。考夫曼和他的同事们直接比较了英国父亲在生孩子时休陪产假的经历和美国父亲的经历,在英国,男性有适度的法定权利享受陪产假,而在美国,男性没有这种权利。当研究的目的是比较时,它做出了重大贡献;当我们可以将一个特定的社会环境与另一个社会环境进行比较和对比时,我们会对它有更多的了解。这些论文对学术的第二个贡献与方法论有关。虽然社会科学的许多领域都被一种方法所主导,但关于父亲身份的新研究流倾向于为我们提供以各种方式收集的信息,本期的论文也是如此。六项研究中有四项依赖于深度访谈分析,这是一种为我们提供丰富描述的定性方法。麦凯和杜塞特对夫妇进行了联合访谈,而不仅仅是对父亲进行访谈,以便更仔细地研究夫妇如何协商父亲应该休多少产假。考夫曼和他的同事向我们描述了没有法定产假权利的男性是如何从工作中抽出短暂但有意义的时间来陪伴他们的新生儿的。其中两项定性研究也是纵向的,这种方法对男性在工作和为人父母之间的和解过程提供了独特的见解。米勒对英国父亲的研究分析了男性在分娩前后对父亲身份的适应。她发现,产后在家的时间有助于男性获得重要的照顾技能,但由于英国的陪产假太短(两周),男性被迫迅速返回带薪工作,这加强了性别家庭惯例。比约恩霍尔特的论文分析了一项独特的后续研究的结果,该研究是对上世纪70年代与母亲共同抚养孩子的挪威父亲进行的。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cyber Dads: What Are Fathers Doing Online? Down Syndrome and Fathering: An Exploration of Ambiguous Loss Fatherhood in St. Kitts: Patterns and Predictors of Partnership and Paternal Dynamics in a Caribbean Island Mind the Gap: The expectation and reality of involved fatherhood What Matters Most? Money, Relationships, and Visions of Masculinity as Key Correlates of Father Involvement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1