DIVORCING PARENTING FROM CHILD SUPPORT: JUSTICE AND CARE IN THE DISCOURSE OF THE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF SHARED CUSTODY

Fathering Pub Date : 2010-04-01 DOI:10.3149/FTH.1802.147
Denise L. Whitehead
{"title":"DIVORCING PARENTING FROM CHILD SUPPORT: JUSTICE AND CARE IN THE DISCOURSE OF THE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF SHARED CUSTODY","authors":"Denise L. Whitehead","doi":"10.3149/FTH.1802.147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The care of children after divorce is increasingly invoking a stance of equality between parents such that there is an increasing emphasis to mandate shared custody. The moral stance of viewing care as “time with” the child and justice as “money” paid has been dominant. Seizing on moral theory and the concepts of justice and care, this paper argues that a 2005 Supreme Court of Canada decision awarding substantial child support in the context of shared custody effectively bridges the concepts of justice (child support) and care (time) in way that puts the child’s best interests at the forefront.","PeriodicalId":88482,"journal":{"name":"Fathering","volume":"8 1","pages":"147-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3149/FTH.1802.147","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fathering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3149/FTH.1802.147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The care of children after divorce is increasingly invoking a stance of equality between parents such that there is an increasing emphasis to mandate shared custody. The moral stance of viewing care as “time with” the child and justice as “money” paid has been dominant. Seizing on moral theory and the concepts of justice and care, this paper argues that a 2005 Supreme Court of Canada decision awarding substantial child support in the context of shared custody effectively bridges the concepts of justice (child support) and care (time) in way that puts the child’s best interests at the forefront.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
养育子女与抚养子女的分离:共同监护权权利与责任话语中的正义与关怀
离婚后对孩子的照顾越来越多地援引父母之间平等的立场,因此越来越强调强制共同监护。将照顾视为与孩子在一起的“时间”,将正义视为支付的“金钱”的道德立场一直占据主导地位。利用道德理论和正义与关怀的概念,本文认为,2005年加拿大最高法院的一项判决在共同监护的背景下给予大量儿童抚养费,有效地将正义(儿童抚养费)和关怀(时间)的概念联系起来,将儿童的最大利益放在首位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cyber Dads: What Are Fathers Doing Online? Down Syndrome and Fathering: An Exploration of Ambiguous Loss Fatherhood in St. Kitts: Patterns and Predictors of Partnership and Paternal Dynamics in a Caribbean Island Mind the Gap: The expectation and reality of involved fatherhood What Matters Most? Money, Relationships, and Visions of Masculinity as Key Correlates of Father Involvement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1