Culture of Critical Discourse on Education and Science

Q1 Arts and Humanities Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii Pub Date : 2018-07-31 DOI:10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-7-20-27
M. B. Sapunov, K. Tkhagapsoev
{"title":"Culture of Critical Discourse on Education and Science","authors":"M. B. Sapunov, K. Tkhagapsoev","doi":"10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-7-20-27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article addresses the problems concerning the formation of the methodology of critical analysis of Russian strategies, which are aimed at reforming and managing of education and science on the basis of modern social science and Humanities studies and the principles of the interdisciplinary approach. The authors state the change of the critique vector – the transition from value-loaded political statements to scientific analysis of the objective factors determining social pathologies in education system. The situation today is characterized by the attempts to find and formulate an objectivated language to describe social reality. In particular, the researchers actively use the methodological potential of such concepts as “converted form”, “red tapes”, “Goodhart’s law”, “Thomas theorem” that are implemented as conceptual tools to comprehend and describe the specificity of educational system. The general meaning of the forming analytical strategy applied to education and science is that all the management actions are subject to “corrective” influence of these principles and laws. Within the framework of this approach critique of education (and the process of its reforming) is indivisible from the constructive analysis of education as a whole system with its immanent dimensions. This approach orients researchers towards studying the “ontological” and “essential” problems of education.","PeriodicalId":37083,"journal":{"name":"Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2018-27-7-20-27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article addresses the problems concerning the formation of the methodology of critical analysis of Russian strategies, which are aimed at reforming and managing of education and science on the basis of modern social science and Humanities studies and the principles of the interdisciplinary approach. The authors state the change of the critique vector – the transition from value-loaded political statements to scientific analysis of the objective factors determining social pathologies in education system. The situation today is characterized by the attempts to find and formulate an objectivated language to describe social reality. In particular, the researchers actively use the methodological potential of such concepts as “converted form”, “red tapes”, “Goodhart’s law”, “Thomas theorem” that are implemented as conceptual tools to comprehend and describe the specificity of educational system. The general meaning of the forming analytical strategy applied to education and science is that all the management actions are subject to “corrective” influence of these principles and laws. Within the framework of this approach critique of education (and the process of its reforming) is indivisible from the constructive analysis of education as a whole system with its immanent dimensions. This approach orients researchers towards studying the “ontological” and “essential” problems of education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育与科学批判话语的文化
本文论述了在现代社会科学和人文科学研究的基础上,以跨学科方法的原则为基础,形成以教育和科学改革与管理为目标的俄罗斯战略批判分析方法论的问题。作者陈述了批判向量的变化-从价值负载的政治声明到对决定教育系统社会病态的客观因素的科学分析的转变。当今形势的特点是试图寻找和制定一种客观的语言来描述社会现实。特别是,研究者积极利用“转换形式”、“繁文缛节”、“古德哈特定律”、“托马斯定理”等概念的方法论潜力,将其作为概念工具来理解和描述教育系统的特殊性。应用于教育和科学的形成分析策略的一般含义是,所有的管理行为都受到这些原则和规律的“纠正”影响。在这种方法的框架内,对教育的批判(及其改革过程)与对教育作为一个整体及其内在维度的建设性分析是不可分割的。这种方法将研究者导向研究教育的“本体论”和“本质”问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii
Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
期刊最新文献
Mechanisms for Activating the Personal Potential of Students in the Context of Digitalization of University Education Russia’s State Policy on the Development of Science at Universities: Lessons from the 90s Image of Higher Educational Institutions: Features of Perception by Graduating Class Students The ADDIE Model in Instructional Design: NUST MISIS Case Study Online Education after the Pandemic: Student Problems and Opportunities Research Using Big Data Tools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1