Evaluations of friends-with-benefits relationship scenarios: Is there evidence of a sexual double standard?

IF 1.4 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.3138/CJHS.2128
Angela D. Weaver, M. Claybourn, Kelly L. MacKeigan
{"title":"Evaluations of friends-with-benefits relationship scenarios: Is there evidence of a sexual double standard?","authors":"Angela D. Weaver, M. Claybourn, Kelly L. MacKeigan","doi":"10.3138/CJHS.2128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More than half of university students report having had a friends-with-benefits relationship (FWBR), i.e., recurring sexual activity between friends who do not define their relationship as romantic, yet little is known about how people in FWBRs are judged by others. For instance, is there a sexual double standard whereby women are judged more negatively than men? In the present study, 404 university students read one of four randomly assigned scenarios describing an FWBR (scenarios varied on character gender and FWBR experience) and then completed measures of their judgment of the main character, their predictions about the relationship depicted, their beliefs about whether the character should keep the relationship secret, and their perception of how the character would be judged by peers. Two respondent-level variables (respondent gender; respondent FWBR experience) were also examined as predictors. Half of the participants (52.5%) had themselves experienced an FWBR, with a majority evaluating these exp...","PeriodicalId":51789,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality","volume":"22 1","pages":"152-159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3138/CJHS.2128","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/CJHS.2128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

More than half of university students report having had a friends-with-benefits relationship (FWBR), i.e., recurring sexual activity between friends who do not define their relationship as romantic, yet little is known about how people in FWBRs are judged by others. For instance, is there a sexual double standard whereby women are judged more negatively than men? In the present study, 404 university students read one of four randomly assigned scenarios describing an FWBR (scenarios varied on character gender and FWBR experience) and then completed measures of their judgment of the main character, their predictions about the relationship depicted, their beliefs about whether the character should keep the relationship secret, and their perception of how the character would be judged by peers. Two respondent-level variables (respondent gender; respondent FWBR experience) were also examined as predictors. Half of the participants (52.5%) had themselves experienced an FWBR, with a majority evaluating these exp...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对炮友关系情景的评估:是否存在性双重标准的证据?
超过一半的大学生报告说,他们有一种“炮友关系”(FWBR),即朋友之间反复发生的性行为,但他们并不把他们的关系定义为浪漫关系。然而,人们对“炮友关系”中的人是如何被别人评价的却知之甚少。例如,是否存在性别双重标准,从而对女性的评价比男性更负面?在目前的研究中,404名大学生阅读了四个随机分配的描述FWBR的场景中的一个(场景因角色性别和FWBR经历而异),然后完成了他们对主角的判断、对所描述的关系的预测、对角色是否应该保密的信念,以及他们对同龄人如何评价角色的看法。两个被调查者水平变量(被调查者性别;受访者的FWBR经验)也作为预测因素进行了检查。一半的参与者(52.5%)自己经历过FWBR,大多数人评估这些经验……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality
Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality (CJHS) is a quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal focusing on the medical, psychological, social, and educational aspects of human sexuality.
期刊最新文献
“Yes doesn’t always mean yes, but no means no”: Exploring the perceived ambiguities in university students’ experiences of sexual consent Gender Differences in Duration and Location of Erotic Touch in Mainstream Heterosexual Pornography Influences on Sexting in an Intimate Relationship: Motivations, Risks, Communication, Personality Traits, and Relationship Variables Speak Out: Lessons on How to Support Canadian 2SLGBTQI Youths Who Face Gender-Based Violence Recalling, Reacting But Not So Much Regretting: How Young Adults Describe Their Sexual and Romantic Infidelity Experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1