Does the sexual self-control model for women apply to undergraduate men?

IF 1.4 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.3138/CJHS.2169
Christopher Quinn-Nilas, D. J. Kennett, Terry P. Humphreys
{"title":"Does the sexual self-control model for women apply to undergraduate men?","authors":"Christopher Quinn-Nilas, D. J. Kennett, Terry P. Humphreys","doi":"10.3138/CJHS.2169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study sought to determine whether the variables of the Sexual Self-control Model that predict sexual resourcefulness and consenting to unwanted sexual advances in undergraduate women also apply to undergraduate men. A sample of 124 males completed the Self-Control Schedule that assesses general learned resourcefulness and also the Sexual Resourcefulness Inventory, Sexual Self-Efficacy Scale, Reasons for Consenting to Unwanted Sexual Advances Scale, and Sexual Giving-in Experiences Survey. As hypothesized and paralleling the results for women, higher levels of general learned resourcefulness and sexual self-efficacy, and fewer reasons for consenting to unwanted sexual advances predicted higher levels of sexual resourcefulness in men. Contrary to the previous findings in women, lower sexual resourcefulness was not a unique predictor of consenting to unwanted advances in men. Instead, a mediation model was supported, whereby males having more reasons for consenting to an unwanted sexual activity were more likely to comply despite having higher levels of sexual resourcefulness skills. In addition, men’s consenting experiences and sexual resourcefulness skills were observed to be significantly lower than women’s. Study limitations and implications for future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":51789,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality","volume":"22 1","pages":"134-141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3138/CJHS.2169","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/CJHS.2169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This study sought to determine whether the variables of the Sexual Self-control Model that predict sexual resourcefulness and consenting to unwanted sexual advances in undergraduate women also apply to undergraduate men. A sample of 124 males completed the Self-Control Schedule that assesses general learned resourcefulness and also the Sexual Resourcefulness Inventory, Sexual Self-Efficacy Scale, Reasons for Consenting to Unwanted Sexual Advances Scale, and Sexual Giving-in Experiences Survey. As hypothesized and paralleling the results for women, higher levels of general learned resourcefulness and sexual self-efficacy, and fewer reasons for consenting to unwanted sexual advances predicted higher levels of sexual resourcefulness in men. Contrary to the previous findings in women, lower sexual resourcefulness was not a unique predictor of consenting to unwanted advances in men. Instead, a mediation model was supported, whereby males having more reasons for consenting to an unwanted sexual activity were more likely to comply despite having higher levels of sexual resourcefulness skills. In addition, men’s consenting experiences and sexual resourcefulness skills were observed to be significantly lower than women’s. Study limitations and implications for future research are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女性的性自我控制模式是否适用于本科男性?
本研究试图确定性自我控制模型中预测大学生女性的性智谋和自愿性行为的变量是否也适用于大学生男性。124名男性完成了自我控制量表,该量表评估了一般的学习能力,性能力量表,性自我效能量表,同意非自愿性行为的原因量表,以及性屈服经历调查。根据对女性的假设和对比结果,更高水平的一般习得性智慧和性自我效能,以及更少的同意非自愿性行为的理由,预示着男性更高水平的性智慧。与之前对女性的研究结果相反,较低的性智谋并不是唯一的预测因素,表明女性会同意男性的不必要的追求。相反,一种中介模型得到了支持,即男性有更多理由同意不想要的性行为,尽管他们有更高水平的性机智技能,但他们更有可能遵守。此外,男性的同意经验和性机智技巧明显低于女性。讨论了研究的局限性和对未来研究的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality
Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality (CJHS) is a quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal focusing on the medical, psychological, social, and educational aspects of human sexuality.
期刊最新文献
“Yes doesn’t always mean yes, but no means no”: Exploring the perceived ambiguities in university students’ experiences of sexual consent Gender Differences in Duration and Location of Erotic Touch in Mainstream Heterosexual Pornography Influences on Sexting in an Intimate Relationship: Motivations, Risks, Communication, Personality Traits, and Relationship Variables Speak Out: Lessons on How to Support Canadian 2SLGBTQI Youths Who Face Gender-Based Violence Recalling, Reacting But Not So Much Regretting: How Young Adults Describe Their Sexual and Romantic Infidelity Experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1