Prevalence and predictors of condom use in a national sample of Canadian university students

IF 1.4 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.3138/CJHS.2316
R. Milhausen, A. McKay, C. Graham, R. Crosby, W. Yarber, S. Sanders
{"title":"Prevalence and predictors of condom use in a national sample of Canadian university students","authors":"R. Milhausen, A. McKay, C. Graham, R. Crosby, W. Yarber, S. Sanders","doi":"10.3138/CJHS.2316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Young adult Canadians of university age are highly sexually active compared to other age groups and are at relatively high risk for sexually transmitted infections (STI). It is therefore important to comprehensively assess condom use in this age group. In this study, the prevalence and individual predictors of condom use at last penile vaginal intercourse (PVI) were assessed in a national sample of 653 Canadian university students (252 male, 401 female). Overall, less than half of students (47.2%) reported condom use at last PVI. Condom use was higher among men (55.4%) than women (42.3%). For both men and women, the most frequently cited main reason for having used a condom was birth control. In multivariate analyses, the strongest predictor of condom use at last PVI was a preference for condoms as a contraceptive method; specifically, men and women who stated condoms were their preferred method were 9 and 23 times, respectively, more likely to use condoms at last PVI than those who selected another method. Female students who reported that their most recent sexual encounter occurred with a more committed partner (e.g., committed dating versus a hook-up) had slightly lower odds of reporting condom use at last PVI. The results indicated that rates of condom use are low among Canadian university students and that many students are likely at high risk for STI. Interventions to raise awareness of STIs are needed on Canadian university campuses and educational programs should emphasize improving attitudes towards condoms in addition to developing sexual health knowledge and condom use skills.","PeriodicalId":51789,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3138/CJHS.2316","citationCount":"60","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/CJHS.2316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 60

Abstract

Young adult Canadians of university age are highly sexually active compared to other age groups and are at relatively high risk for sexually transmitted infections (STI). It is therefore important to comprehensively assess condom use in this age group. In this study, the prevalence and individual predictors of condom use at last penile vaginal intercourse (PVI) were assessed in a national sample of 653 Canadian university students (252 male, 401 female). Overall, less than half of students (47.2%) reported condom use at last PVI. Condom use was higher among men (55.4%) than women (42.3%). For both men and women, the most frequently cited main reason for having used a condom was birth control. In multivariate analyses, the strongest predictor of condom use at last PVI was a preference for condoms as a contraceptive method; specifically, men and women who stated condoms were their preferred method were 9 and 23 times, respectively, more likely to use condoms at last PVI than those who selected another method. Female students who reported that their most recent sexual encounter occurred with a more committed partner (e.g., committed dating versus a hook-up) had slightly lower odds of reporting condom use at last PVI. The results indicated that rates of condom use are low among Canadian university students and that many students are likely at high risk for STI. Interventions to raise awareness of STIs are needed on Canadian university campuses and educational programs should emphasize improving attitudes towards condoms in addition to developing sexual health knowledge and condom use skills.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大大学生国家样本中避孕套使用的流行率和预测因素
与其他年龄组相比,大学年龄的加拿大年轻人性活跃程度高,性传播感染(STI)的风险相对较高。因此,全面评估这一年龄组的安全套使用情况是很重要的。在这项研究中,对653名加拿大大学生(252名男性,401名女性)在最后一次阴茎阴道性交(PVI)中使用避孕套的流行程度和个体预测因素进行了评估。总体而言,不到一半的学生(47.2%)报告在最后的性侵中使用安全套。男性使用安全套的比例(55.4%)高于女性(42.3%)。对于男性和女性来说,使用避孕套最常见的主要原因是避孕。在多变量分析中,避孕套使用的最强预测因子是避孕套作为一种避孕方法的偏好;具体来说,在最后的PVI中使用避孕套的男性和女性分别比选择其他方法的男性和女性多出9倍和23倍。报告说她们最近的性接触发生在一个更忠诚的伴侣(例如,忠诚的约会与勾搭)的女学生在最后的PVI中报告使用避孕套的几率略低。调查结果显示,加拿大大学生使用安全套的比例很低,而且很多学生感染性病的风险很高。在加拿大的大学校园里,需要采取干预措施提高人们对性传播感染的认识,教育项目除了发展性健康知识和使用避孕套的技能外,还应强调改善人们对避孕套的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality
Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality (CJHS) is a quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal focusing on the medical, psychological, social, and educational aspects of human sexuality.
期刊最新文献
Influences on Sexting in an Intimate Relationship: Motivations, Risks, Communication, Personality Traits, and Relationship Variables Speak Out: Lessons on How to Support Canadian 2SLGBTQI Youths Who Face Gender-Based Violence Recalling, Reacting But Not So Much Regretting: How Young Adults Describe Their Sexual and Romantic Infidelity Experiences The impact of sexual education and socialization on sexual satisfaction, attitudes, and self-efficacy Generational differences in sexual behaviour and partnering among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1