{"title":"‘Quaker Sweat’ as Intangible Heritage","authors":"B. Aldred","doi":"10.35638/IJIH.2011..6.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2004, a small ritual to be held at a Quaker conference in Massachusetts stirred up a big controversy. The ‘Quaker Sweat’, a syncretic ritual drawing on Lakota, Cherokee and Religious Society of Friends sources, drew protests from a local Native American group. The controversy that emerged within the Friends General Conference, a national Quaker group, highlights the complex dynamics of the cultural property debate. Does the ritual belong to George Price, who developed it? Does the ritual belong to the Lakota, who taught him and gave him permission? Does the ritual belong to the Wampanoag on whose land it was to take place? In the ensuing debate, questions of syncretism and property are examined, taking into account the complex issues of personal versus cultural value, the role of history and experience in cultural property and the complexities of different cultural models of agency related to shared cultural forms. How does a cultural property debate develop between interested actors without the intervention of governments or inter-governmental bodies?","PeriodicalId":42289,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intangible Heritage","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intangible Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35638/IJIH.2011..6.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In 2004, a small ritual to be held at a Quaker conference in Massachusetts stirred up a big controversy. The ‘Quaker Sweat’, a syncretic ritual drawing on Lakota, Cherokee and Religious Society of Friends sources, drew protests from a local Native American group. The controversy that emerged within the Friends General Conference, a national Quaker group, highlights the complex dynamics of the cultural property debate. Does the ritual belong to George Price, who developed it? Does the ritual belong to the Lakota, who taught him and gave him permission? Does the ritual belong to the Wampanoag on whose land it was to take place? In the ensuing debate, questions of syncretism and property are examined, taking into account the complex issues of personal versus cultural value, the role of history and experience in cultural property and the complexities of different cultural models of agency related to shared cultural forms. How does a cultural property debate develop between interested actors without the intervention of governments or inter-governmental bodies?
2004年,在马萨诸塞州举行的贵格会会议上举行的一个小仪式引起了很大的争议。“贵格会的汗水”是一种融合了拉科塔人、切诺基人和宗教之友协会的宗教仪式,引起了当地印第安人团体的抗议。在全国贵格会组织“友会总会”(Friends General Conference)内部出现的争议,突显了文化财产辩论的复杂动态。这个仪式是由乔治·普莱斯发明的吗?这个仪式是拉科塔人的吗,是他教他并允许他这么做的?这个仪式是在万帕诺亚格人的土地上举行的吗?在随后的辩论中,考虑到个人与文化价值的复杂问题,历史和经验在文化财产中的作用以及与共享文化形式相关的不同文化代理模式的复杂性,对融合和财产问题进行了审查。在没有政府或政府间机构干预的情况下,有关文化财产的辩论如何在相关行动者之间展开?