NDT assessment of existing concrete structures: spatial analysis of rebound hammer results recorded in-situ

A. Borosnyói
{"title":"NDT assessment of existing concrete structures: spatial analysis of rebound hammer results recorded in-situ","authors":"A. Borosnyói","doi":"10.3846/2029882X.2015.1085331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractA comparative spatial analysis of surface hardness of structural concrete is introduced. Main objective of the paper is to make a repeatability comparison of three types of the still most popular non-destructive testing devices for concrete: L-type original Schmidt rebound hammer, N-type original Schmidt rebound hammer and N-type Silver Schmidt rebound hammer. Results indicate that the surface hardness measurement uncertainty is related to the weight of the hammer mass and is apparently not related to the impact energy of the rebound hammer devices. It is observed that the measure of surface hardness for the Silver Schmidt rebound hammer (Q-value) does not have positive correlation to the original rebound index (R). Results indicate the best performance of the N-type original Schmidt rebound hammer in terms of stability and normality of data. Geostatistical analysis of the measured data (in terms of empirical semivariograms) highlights different statistical behaviour for the mechanical recording r...","PeriodicalId":11839,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures and Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3846/2029882X.2015.1085331","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/2029882X.2015.1085331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

AbstractA comparative spatial analysis of surface hardness of structural concrete is introduced. Main objective of the paper is to make a repeatability comparison of three types of the still most popular non-destructive testing devices for concrete: L-type original Schmidt rebound hammer, N-type original Schmidt rebound hammer and N-type Silver Schmidt rebound hammer. Results indicate that the surface hardness measurement uncertainty is related to the weight of the hammer mass and is apparently not related to the impact energy of the rebound hammer devices. It is observed that the measure of surface hardness for the Silver Schmidt rebound hammer (Q-value) does not have positive correlation to the original rebound index (R). Results indicate the best performance of the N-type original Schmidt rebound hammer in terms of stability and normality of data. Geostatistical analysis of the measured data (in terms of empirical semivariograms) highlights different statistical behaviour for the mechanical recording r...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
既有混凝土结构无损检测评估:现场记录回弹锤结果的空间分析
摘要介绍了结构混凝土表面硬度的空间对比分析。本文的主要目的是对目前最流行的三种混凝土无损检测装置:l型原装施密特反弹锤、n型原装施密特反弹锤和n型银色施密特反弹锤进行重复性比较。结果表明,表面硬度测量的不确定度与锤体质量的重量有关,与回弹锤装置的冲击能无关。观察到,银施密特反弹锤的表面硬度指标q值与原始反弹指数R值不存在正相关关系,结果表明n型原始施密特反弹锤在数据的稳定性和正态性方面表现最好。测量数据的地质统计学分析(根据经验半方差图)突出了机械记录的不同统计行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
ASSESSMENT OF DEFECTS IN MASONRY WALLS FOR THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS IN LITHUANIA A SIMPLE APPROACH FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING ON BASIS OF PROBABILITY THEORY BEHAVIOR OF PRE-STRESSED INTERSECTING CABLE STEEL BRIDGE ANALYSIS FOR SYMMETRICAL AND ASYMMETRICAL LOADING OF A SINGLE-SPAN COMBINED STRING STEEL STRUCTURE EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS ON INNOVATIVE CRACK REPAIR METHODS AND REINFORCING STEEL STRUCTURES WITH ADHESIVLY BONDED CFRP – LAMELLAS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1