Prospective Analysis of Fusion Rate with a New Demineralized Bone Matrix

Cristian Balcescu, Kayla Bradburn, Alex, er Rosinsky, Jeffrey A. Konopka, M. McCarthy, Joseph D. Smucker, Barrett S. Boody, R. Sasso
{"title":"Prospective Analysis of Fusion Rate with a New Demineralized Bone Matrix","authors":"Cristian Balcescu, Kayla Bradburn, Alex, er Rosinsky, Jeffrey A. Konopka, M. McCarthy, Joseph D. Smucker, Barrett S. Boody, R. Sasso","doi":"10.37421/2165-7939.2021.10.489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study background: Autologous Iliac Crest Bone Graft is considered the gold standard graft for use in instrumented spinal fusion procedures. Due to significant morbidity and complication rate, alternate graft materials have been investigated. This study seeks to determine the fusion rate of one such alternative, the K2M VESUVIUSTM Osteobiologic Fibers, a form of demineralized bone matrix. Methods: Prospectively collected CT scans of 27 patients with 29 instrumented levels were taken 1 year post-operatively. These were reviewed blindly by 5 fellowship trained spine surgeons to evaluate for fusion. The fusion mass was graded as no fusion (grade 1), partial unilateral (grade 2), partial bilateral (grade 3), solid unilateral (grade 4), or solid bilateral (grade 5). The fusion mass was then further classified as solid (grade 4-5), probable fusion (grade 3), or non-union (grade 1-2). The Kappa method was used to assess interrater reliability. We calculated the proportion of successful subjects at both cut-off values of either Grade 3 or Grade 4/5. Results: When using a cut-off grade of 3 or higher, 40% of subjects achieved fusion according to 4 of 5 graders and 50% achieved fusion according to 3 of the 5 graders. When using a cut-off grade of 4 or higher, 28% of subjects were found to achieve fusion by at least 4 graders and approximately 50% achieved fusion according to 3 of the graders. When analyzing correlation between the reviewers, 8 of 10 interrater reliabilities demonstrated moderate to good agreement. Correlation by grade showed that only grade 1 had significant agreement amongst the graders with a kappa value of 0.3394. Otherwise, the combined kappa value was 0.1092. Conclusion: Compared to the literature control using iliac crest bone autograft of 70.6% fusion rate, the results with K2M VESUVIUSTM Osteobiologic Fibers DBM were disappointing regardless of the cut off used.","PeriodicalId":89593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37421/2165-7939.2021.10.489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study background: Autologous Iliac Crest Bone Graft is considered the gold standard graft for use in instrumented spinal fusion procedures. Due to significant morbidity and complication rate, alternate graft materials have been investigated. This study seeks to determine the fusion rate of one such alternative, the K2M VESUVIUSTM Osteobiologic Fibers, a form of demineralized bone matrix. Methods: Prospectively collected CT scans of 27 patients with 29 instrumented levels were taken 1 year post-operatively. These were reviewed blindly by 5 fellowship trained spine surgeons to evaluate for fusion. The fusion mass was graded as no fusion (grade 1), partial unilateral (grade 2), partial bilateral (grade 3), solid unilateral (grade 4), or solid bilateral (grade 5). The fusion mass was then further classified as solid (grade 4-5), probable fusion (grade 3), or non-union (grade 1-2). The Kappa method was used to assess interrater reliability. We calculated the proportion of successful subjects at both cut-off values of either Grade 3 or Grade 4/5. Results: When using a cut-off grade of 3 or higher, 40% of subjects achieved fusion according to 4 of 5 graders and 50% achieved fusion according to 3 of the 5 graders. When using a cut-off grade of 4 or higher, 28% of subjects were found to achieve fusion by at least 4 graders and approximately 50% achieved fusion according to 3 of the graders. When analyzing correlation between the reviewers, 8 of 10 interrater reliabilities demonstrated moderate to good agreement. Correlation by grade showed that only grade 1 had significant agreement amongst the graders with a kappa value of 0.3394. Otherwise, the combined kappa value was 0.1092. Conclusion: Compared to the literature control using iliac crest bone autograft of 70.6% fusion rate, the results with K2M VESUVIUSTM Osteobiologic Fibers DBM were disappointing regardless of the cut off used.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型脱矿骨基质融合率的前瞻性分析
研究背景:自体髂骨骨移植物被认为是固定脊柱融合术中使用的金标准移植物。由于明显的发病率和并发症发生率,替代移植材料已被研究。本研究旨在确定其中一种替代材料——K2M VESUVIUSTM骨生物纤维(一种脱矿骨基质)的融合率。方法:前瞻性收集27例患者术后1年29个固定节段的CT扫描。这些数据由5名接受过奖学金培训的脊柱外科医生进行盲检,以评估融合效果。融合块被分为未融合(1级)、部分单侧(2级)、部分双侧(3级)、实性单侧(4级)或实性双侧(5级)。然后融合块进一步被分为实性(4-5级)、可能融合(3级)或不愈合(1-2级)。采用Kappa法评估互译器的信度。我们在3年级或4/5年级的临界值处计算了成功受试者的比例。结果:当使用3级或更高的临界值时,40%的受试者根据5级中的4级实现融合,50%的受试者根据5级中的3级实现融合。当使用4级或更高的临界值时,28%的受试者至少达到4级融合,约50%的受试者达到3级融合。当分析审稿人之间的相关性时,10个审稿人中有8个显示出中等到良好的一致性。年级间的相关分析显示,只有1年级的学生之间的kappa值为0.3394,具有显著的一致性。否则,联合kappa值为0.1092。结论:与文献对照的70.6%的自体髂骨骨融合率相比,无论采用何种切断方式,K2M VESUVIUSTM骨生物纤维DBM的效果都令人失望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nerve Injury in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Importance of Anticoagulants and Antiplatelet Agents in Spine Surgery Theoretical Model of the Lumbar Spine Musculature Editorial Note on Spondylolysis & Spondylolisthesis A Rare Case of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression Originating from Extragonadal Mediastinal Yolk Sac Tumor: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1