{"title":"Regional planning reform in Indonesia","authors":"G. Ferrazzi","doi":"10.3828/TWPR.23.3.W041710121R15351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The government of Indonesia is once again attempting to create a more decentralised regional development planning system. There have been many reform efforts over the last decade, but all have been compromised by patrimonial tendencies. In the post-Soeharto decentralisation reforms, begun in 1999, the building blocks of functional assignment and finance are finally being put in place, and upon these a truly decentralised planning system could conceivably be fashioned. This decentralisation framework has some flaws, but it is a significant departure from past centralised arrangements. However, the planning component is still conceptually weak and in disarray, caught in the same interagency wrangles that marked the New Order period. Ultimately, the persistently patrimonial bureaucracy may see the planning system as a tool that may be used to regain some of the control given away in the overall decentralisation framework. Progress on a decentralised planning system is also threatened by the possible misuse o...","PeriodicalId":85791,"journal":{"name":"Third world planning review","volume":"23 1","pages":"249-272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3828/TWPR.23.3.W041710121R15351","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Third world planning review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/TWPR.23.3.W041710121R15351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The government of Indonesia is once again attempting to create a more decentralised regional development planning system. There have been many reform efforts over the last decade, but all have been compromised by patrimonial tendencies. In the post-Soeharto decentralisation reforms, begun in 1999, the building blocks of functional assignment and finance are finally being put in place, and upon these a truly decentralised planning system could conceivably be fashioned. This decentralisation framework has some flaws, but it is a significant departure from past centralised arrangements. However, the planning component is still conceptually weak and in disarray, caught in the same interagency wrangles that marked the New Order period. Ultimately, the persistently patrimonial bureaucracy may see the planning system as a tool that may be used to regain some of the control given away in the overall decentralisation framework. Progress on a decentralised planning system is also threatened by the possible misuse o...