Choosing Factors: Not “Which?” but “When?”

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Index Investing Pub Date : 2016-08-31 DOI:10.3905/jii.2016.7.2.100
Michael R. Hunstad
{"title":"Choosing Factors: Not “Which?” but “When?”","authors":"Michael R. Hunstad","doi":"10.3905/jii.2016.7.2.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Equity factors such as value, size, and momentum have notoriously cyclical return patterns that may make them inappropriate investments depending on one’s time horizon. In this article, the author sizes the duration of these cycles and shows that cycle length varies considerably across factors. A simple rule of thumb emerges from this analysis: A factor should not be considered if the intended holding period is less than the cycle length. In other words, time diversification is a key consideration in choosing factors. He then uses a multiperiod optimization algorithm incorporating factor cycle lengths to select optimal factor allocations. As expected, the model tends to align factor cycle length and time to liquidation. That is, longer cycle factors were more prevalent in the optimal portfolio the longer the time to liquidation, and vice versa. These results add to the existing literature in helping to answer the question of which factor is best. Interestingly, the results suggest that we may be asking the wrong question—that we should be asking not which? but when?","PeriodicalId":36431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Index Investing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3905/jii.2016.7.2.100","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Index Investing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2016.7.2.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Equity factors such as value, size, and momentum have notoriously cyclical return patterns that may make them inappropriate investments depending on one’s time horizon. In this article, the author sizes the duration of these cycles and shows that cycle length varies considerably across factors. A simple rule of thumb emerges from this analysis: A factor should not be considered if the intended holding period is less than the cycle length. In other words, time diversification is a key consideration in choosing factors. He then uses a multiperiod optimization algorithm incorporating factor cycle lengths to select optimal factor allocations. As expected, the model tends to align factor cycle length and time to liquidation. That is, longer cycle factors were more prevalent in the optimal portfolio the longer the time to liquidation, and vice versa. These results add to the existing literature in helping to answer the question of which factor is best. Interestingly, the results suggest that we may be asking the wrong question—that we should be asking not which? but when?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择因素:不是“哪个?”而是“什么时候?”
价值、规模和势头等股票因素具有众所周知的周期性回报模式,这可能使它们成为不合适的投资,具体取决于一个人的时间范围。在本文中,作者对这些周期的持续时间进行了评估,并表明周期长度因因素而异。从这个分析中可以得出一个简单的经验法则:如果预期的持有期小于周期长度,则不应考虑一个因素。换句话说,时间分散是选择因素的关键考虑因素。然后,他使用一种结合因子周期长度的多周期优化算法来选择最优因子分配。正如预期的那样,该模型倾向于使因子周期长度和清算时间对齐。也就是说,较长的周期因素在最优投资组合中越普遍,清算时间越长,反之亦然。这些结果增加了现有文献,有助于回答哪个因素是最好的问题。有趣的是,结果表明我们可能问错了问题——我们应该问的不是哪个问题?但当吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Index Investing
Journal of Index Investing Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Refusal as Repair Australia in the World’s Art Colonies 1900—Pyrrhic Victory Fugitive Abstraction Destruction or Secession?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1