Nation-World: Autarky and Geo-economics in Montchrétien’s Traicté

IF 0.1 Q4 ECONOMICS History of Economic Thought and Policy Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.3280/SPE2016-002006
Rosario Patalano
{"title":"Nation-World: Autarky and Geo-economics in Montchrétien’s Traicté","authors":"Rosario Patalano","doi":"10.3280/SPE2016-002006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his Traicte de l’oeconomie politique (1615), Antoine de Montchretien proposed a model of development, based on an autarkic economy, formulating analytical and political alternative to increasing integration of world trade, which in the seventeenth century was under Dutch and English hegemony. Montchretien’s response to the problem of world trade integration focused on the establishment of a French colonial empire, completely self-sufficient and closed to international trade. Montchretien proposed an “economic nationalism” connecting politics and the economy, in a perspective that would be called geo-economic, pitting nationalism against globalization to avoid the failure in international trade competition that could threaten the political survival and independence of the country’s national interests. This paper explores the analytical frameworks of Montchretien’s autarkic model, which constitutes an exception in the 17th century literature, which is focused on the idea of commercial supremacy and the gains of trade in a context of international competition.","PeriodicalId":40401,"journal":{"name":"History of Economic Thought and Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":"85-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economic Thought and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/SPE2016-002006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In his Traicte de l’oeconomie politique (1615), Antoine de Montchretien proposed a model of development, based on an autarkic economy, formulating analytical and political alternative to increasing integration of world trade, which in the seventeenth century was under Dutch and English hegemony. Montchretien’s response to the problem of world trade integration focused on the establishment of a French colonial empire, completely self-sufficient and closed to international trade. Montchretien proposed an “economic nationalism” connecting politics and the economy, in a perspective that would be called geo-economic, pitting nationalism against globalization to avoid the failure in international trade competition that could threaten the political survival and independence of the country’s national interests. This paper explores the analytical frameworks of Montchretien’s autarkic model, which constitutes an exception in the 17th century literature, which is focused on the idea of commercial supremacy and the gains of trade in a context of international competition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民族-世界:monchrimatien的《民族与世界》中的自给自足与地缘经济
安托万·德·蒙克雷蒂安(Antoine de Montchretien)在他的《政治经济学》(Traicte del’oeconomipolitique)(1615)中提出了一种基于自给自足经济的发展模式,为17世纪荷兰和英国霸权下日益一体化的世界贸易制定了分析和政治替代方案。蒙克雷蒂安对世界贸易一体化问题的反应集中在建立一个完全自给自足和封闭于国际贸易的法国殖民帝国。蒙克雷蒂安从地缘经济的角度提出了政治与经济相结合的“经济民族主义”,以民族主义对抗全球化,避免在国际贸易竞争中失败而威胁到国家的政治生存和国家利益的独立性。本文探讨了蒙克雷蒂安自给自足模型的分析框架,这是17世纪文学中的一个例外,它关注的是国际竞争背景下的商业霸权和贸易收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Market Failures and Multi-layered Collective Action. US Economic Debates The Impossibility of a Paretian (Il)liberal. A Historical Review Around Sen's Liberalism (1970-1996) Facing Stagflation in the Seventies in Italy: Fausto Vicarelli's Economic Policy Proposals Louis Brandeis - Founding Father of Modern-Day Antitrust? Book review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1