On the Usefulness of Constant Gain Least Squares when Forecasting the Unemployment Rate

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Applied Economics Quarterly Pub Date : 2014-12-01 DOI:10.3790/AEQ.60.4.315
J. Antipin, F. Boumédiène, Pär Österholm
{"title":"On the Usefulness of Constant Gain Least Squares when Forecasting the Unemployment Rate","authors":"J. Antipin, F. Boumédiène, Pär Österholm","doi":"10.3790/AEQ.60.4.315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we assess the usefulness of constant gain least squares (CGLS) when forecasting the unemployment rate. Using quarterly data from 1970 to 2009, we conduct an out-of-sample forecast exercise in which univariate autoregressive models for the unemployment rate in Australia, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States are employed. Results show that CGLS very rarely outperforms OLS. At horizons of six to eight quarters, OLS is always associated with higher forecast precision, regardless of model size or gain employed for Australia, Sweden and the United States. Our findings suggest that while CGLS has been shown valuable when forecasting certain macroeconomic time series, it has shortcomings when forecasting the unemployment rate. One problematic feature is found to be an increased tendency for the autoregressive model to have explosive dynamics when estimated with CGLS.","PeriodicalId":36978,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economics Quarterly","volume":"60 1","pages":"315-336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Economics Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/AEQ.60.4.315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper, we assess the usefulness of constant gain least squares (CGLS) when forecasting the unemployment rate. Using quarterly data from 1970 to 2009, we conduct an out-of-sample forecast exercise in which univariate autoregressive models for the unemployment rate in Australia, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States are employed. Results show that CGLS very rarely outperforms OLS. At horizons of six to eight quarters, OLS is always associated with higher forecast precision, regardless of model size or gain employed for Australia, Sweden and the United States. Our findings suggest that while CGLS has been shown valuable when forecasting certain macroeconomic time series, it has shortcomings when forecasting the unemployment rate. One problematic feature is found to be an increased tendency for the autoregressive model to have explosive dynamics when estimated with CGLS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
常数增益最小二乘预测失业率的有效性研究
在本文中,我们评估了常数增益最小二乘(CGLS)在预测失业率时的有效性。利用1970年至2009年的季度数据,我们对澳大利亚、瑞典、英国和美国的失业率采用单变量自回归模型进行了样本外预测。结果表明,CGLS很少优于OLS。无论澳大利亚、瑞典和美国采用的模式大小或增益如何,在6至8个季度的范围内,OLS总是与较高的预测精度有关。我们的研究结果表明,虽然CGLS在预测某些宏观经济时间序列时显示出价值,但在预测失业率时存在不足。发现一个有问题的特征是,当用CGLS估计时,自回归模型具有爆炸动力学的趋势增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Economics Quarterly
Applied Economics Quarterly Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social and Solidarity Economy in Morocco: Cooperatives’ Behavior and Growth Exchange Rate Pass-Through, Inflation, and Monetary Policy in Egypt Do Fiscal Regimes Matter for Fiscal Sustainability in South Africa? A Markov-Switching Approach Designing GDP-Linked Bonds with Default Industrial Output Growth Forecast: A Machine Learning Approach Based on Cross-Validation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1