Analyzing BRIC Competitiveness in the EU-14, Japan, US and Norway

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Applied Economics Quarterly Pub Date : 2015-09-01 DOI:10.3790/AEQ.61.3.229
Thannaletchimy Thanagopal
{"title":"Analyzing BRIC Competitiveness in the EU-14, Japan, US and Norway","authors":"Thannaletchimy Thanagopal","doi":"10.3790/AEQ.61.3.229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Constant Market Shares Analysis is useful in explaining the gain in export market shares of a country through two terms – structural and competitive effect. However, the model fails to define the type of competitiveness – whether a country is competitive in terms of prices (price competitiveness) or in terms of non-price factors such as quality and variety (non-price competitiveness). This article attempts to improve this analysis by estimating individual price and non-price competitive effect using an export share equation. Our article is original in representing product quality with a ‘knowledge’ variable that reflects the technological know-how of the country including knowledge spillovers from other countries and industries. Using a highly disaggregated industrial trade data over a period of 16 years (1996 to 2011), we find evidence of competitive effects in BRIC exports towards major industrialized countries namely EU-14 (excluding Luxembourg), Japan, United States and Norway. We also find that this gain in export market share is largely attributed to better price competition rather than non-price competition. The industrial results, however, indicate the presence of non-price competitiveness in selected homogeneous product sectors during this period, suggesting the beginning of a shift in BRIC export competitiveness.","PeriodicalId":36978,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economics Quarterly","volume":"61 1","pages":"229-260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Economics Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/AEQ.61.3.229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Constant Market Shares Analysis is useful in explaining the gain in export market shares of a country through two terms – structural and competitive effect. However, the model fails to define the type of competitiveness – whether a country is competitive in terms of prices (price competitiveness) or in terms of non-price factors such as quality and variety (non-price competitiveness). This article attempts to improve this analysis by estimating individual price and non-price competitive effect using an export share equation. Our article is original in representing product quality with a ‘knowledge’ variable that reflects the technological know-how of the country including knowledge spillovers from other countries and industries. Using a highly disaggregated industrial trade data over a period of 16 years (1996 to 2011), we find evidence of competitive effects in BRIC exports towards major industrialized countries namely EU-14 (excluding Luxembourg), Japan, United States and Norway. We also find that this gain in export market share is largely attributed to better price competition rather than non-price competition. The industrial results, however, indicate the presence of non-price competitiveness in selected homogeneous product sectors during this period, suggesting the beginning of a shift in BRIC export competitiveness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析金砖四国在欧盟14国、日本、美国和挪威的竞争力
恒定市场份额分析可以通过结构效应和竞争效应两个术语来解释一国出口市场份额的增加。然而,该模型未能定义竞争力的类型-一个国家是在价格方面具有竞争力(价格竞争力)还是在质量和品种等非价格因素方面具有竞争力(非价格竞争力)。本文试图通过使用出口份额方程来估计个体价格和非价格竞争效应来改进这一分析。我们的文章在用“知识”变量表示产品质量方面具有独创性,该变量反映了一个国家的技术知识,包括来自其他国家和行业的知识溢出。利用16年(1996年至2011年)的高度分类的工业贸易数据,我们发现了金砖四国对主要工业化国家即欧盟14国(不包括卢森堡)、日本、美国和挪威出口的竞争效应的证据。我们还发现,这种出口市场份额的增加在很大程度上归因于更好的价格竞争,而不是非价格竞争。然而,工业结果表明,在此期间,在选定的同质产品部门中存在非价格竞争力,这表明金砖四国出口竞争力开始转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Economics Quarterly
Applied Economics Quarterly Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social and Solidarity Economy in Morocco: Cooperatives’ Behavior and Growth Exchange Rate Pass-Through, Inflation, and Monetary Policy in Egypt Do Fiscal Regimes Matter for Fiscal Sustainability in South Africa? A Markov-Switching Approach Designing GDP-Linked Bonds with Default Industrial Output Growth Forecast: A Machine Learning Approach Based on Cross-Validation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1