The Welfare State and Economic Performance: Quantiles and Nonlinearities

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Applied Economics Quarterly Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI:10.3790/AEQ.62.4.269
Adelaide Duarte, Marta C. N. Simões, J. Andrade
{"title":"The Welfare State and Economic Performance: Quantiles and Nonlinearities","authors":"Adelaide Duarte, Marta C. N. Simões, J. Andrade","doi":"10.3790/AEQ.62.4.269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the relationship between the welfare state and aggregate macroeconomic performance for a sample of OECD countries over the period 1980–2013 based on data for social spending and output. We provide a descriptive statistics and econometric analysis of the former relationship in order to investigate the following hypotheses: a) the evolution of public social spending depends on the income level of countries; b) the relationship between social spending and output depends on the size of the welfare state; and c) the relationship is non-linear and depends on the associated welfare state regime. In addition to descriptive statistics based on quantile techniques, econometric methods suitable for the analysis of non-stationary series (DOLS) and a model with thresholds (Hansen, 1999) are applied. The descriptive statistics analysis supports the first two hypotheses for the whole sample of 25 OECD countries and for the groups obtained by dividing the sample according to either output or social expenditures quantiles. This analysis also points to a non-monotonic relationship between social spending and output—positive for the whole sample but negative for high values of output and social expenditures-, although in the latter case applying only to a small number of observations. Accordingly, we next applied econometrics methods suitable for non-stationary series to assess whether the relationship is spurious. The regression results with the DOLS model confirm that there is a positive long-term relationship between output and social expenditures regardless of the distribution considered for the identification of the country groups. Therefore we were not able to provide evidence supporting hypothesis (b). Additionally, we identified three welfare state regimes that have associated a tenuous “law” of diminishing returns to social spending.","PeriodicalId":36978,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economics Quarterly","volume":"62 1","pages":"269-296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Economics Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/AEQ.62.4.269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between the welfare state and aggregate macroeconomic performance for a sample of OECD countries over the period 1980–2013 based on data for social spending and output. We provide a descriptive statistics and econometric analysis of the former relationship in order to investigate the following hypotheses: a) the evolution of public social spending depends on the income level of countries; b) the relationship between social spending and output depends on the size of the welfare state; and c) the relationship is non-linear and depends on the associated welfare state regime. In addition to descriptive statistics based on quantile techniques, econometric methods suitable for the analysis of non-stationary series (DOLS) and a model with thresholds (Hansen, 1999) are applied. The descriptive statistics analysis supports the first two hypotheses for the whole sample of 25 OECD countries and for the groups obtained by dividing the sample according to either output or social expenditures quantiles. This analysis also points to a non-monotonic relationship between social spending and output—positive for the whole sample but negative for high values of output and social expenditures-, although in the latter case applying only to a small number of observations. Accordingly, we next applied econometrics methods suitable for non-stationary series to assess whether the relationship is spurious. The regression results with the DOLS model confirm that there is a positive long-term relationship between output and social expenditures regardless of the distribution considered for the identification of the country groups. Therefore we were not able to provide evidence supporting hypothesis (b). Additionally, we identified three welfare state regimes that have associated a tenuous “law” of diminishing returns to social spending.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
福利国家和经济表现:分位数和非线性
本研究基于社会支出和产出的数据,以1980-2013年的经合组织国家为样本,考察了福利国家与总体宏观经济绩效之间的关系。我们对前一种关系进行了描述性统计和计量经济学分析,以调查以下假设:a)公共社会支出的演变取决于国家的收入水平;B)社会支出与产出之间的关系取决于福利国家的规模;c)这种关系是非线性的,取决于相关的福利国家制度。除了基于分位数技术的描述性统计外,还应用了适合分析非平稳序列(DOLS)的计量经济学方法和带有阈值的模型(Hansen, 1999)。描述性统计分析支持前两个假设,适用于25个经合发组织国家的整个样本,以及根据产出或社会支出分位数划分样本所得的群体。这一分析还指出社会支出和产出之间的非单调关系——对整个样本来说是正的,但对产出和社会支出的高价值来说是负的——尽管在后一种情况下只适用于少数观察结果。因此,我们接下来应用适合于非平稳序列的计量经济学方法来评估这种关系是否虚假。DOLS模型的回归结果证实,产出与社会支出之间存在正的长期关系,而不考虑用于确定国家群体的分配。因此,我们无法提供支持假设(b)的证据。此外,我们确定了三种福利国家制度,它们与社会支出的收益递减的脆弱“规律”相关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Economics Quarterly
Applied Economics Quarterly Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social and Solidarity Economy in Morocco: Cooperatives’ Behavior and Growth Exchange Rate Pass-Through, Inflation, and Monetary Policy in Egypt Do Fiscal Regimes Matter for Fiscal Sustainability in South Africa? A Markov-Switching Approach Designing GDP-Linked Bonds with Default Industrial Output Growth Forecast: A Machine Learning Approach Based on Cross-Validation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1