Global Crises and Contagion: Does the Capitalization Size Matter?

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Applied Economics Quarterly Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.3790/aeq.64.1.39
Dimitris Kenourgios, D. Dimitriou, Aristeidis Samitas
{"title":"Global Crises and Contagion: Does the Capitalization Size Matter?","authors":"Dimitris Kenourgios, D. Dimitriou, Aristeidis Samitas","doi":"10.3790/aeq.64.1.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the spread of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and the Eurozone Sovereign Debt Crisis (ESDC) to different market capitalization segments across countries and regions. Specifically, it tests for capitalization-specific contagion across both crises and their phases by examining large, medium and small capitalization indices of G-20 equity markets. The analysis across stable and the two crisis periods shows the existence of a stronger largecap transmission channel for the majority of countries. On the other hand, the contagion dynamics across the phases of the two crises do not provide a clear pattern of a specific cap size-based contagion across all markets. However, there is evidence that the Pacific region and the three cap groups of some individual markets of different regions are less severely affected. Further, all three cap groups of developed markets are mostly affected during the last phase of the ESDC, while emerging and frontier markets show a more diverse pattern of contagion across the phases of both crises. Finally, the Lehman Brothers’ collapse triggers a dramatic increase of the infection rate, while the ESDC seems to be more contagious than the GFC.","PeriodicalId":36978,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economics Quarterly","volume":"64 1","pages":"39-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Economics Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/aeq.64.1.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper investigates the spread of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and the Eurozone Sovereign Debt Crisis (ESDC) to different market capitalization segments across countries and regions. Specifically, it tests for capitalization-specific contagion across both crises and their phases by examining large, medium and small capitalization indices of G-20 equity markets. The analysis across stable and the two crisis periods shows the existence of a stronger largecap transmission channel for the majority of countries. On the other hand, the contagion dynamics across the phases of the two crises do not provide a clear pattern of a specific cap size-based contagion across all markets. However, there is evidence that the Pacific region and the three cap groups of some individual markets of different regions are less severely affected. Further, all three cap groups of developed markets are mostly affected during the last phase of the ESDC, while emerging and frontier markets show a more diverse pattern of contagion across the phases of both crises. Finally, the Lehman Brothers’ collapse triggers a dramatic increase of the infection rate, while the ESDC seems to be more contagious than the GFC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球危机及其蔓延:资本化规模重要吗?
本文研究了全球金融危机(GFC)和欧元区主权债务危机(ESDC)在不同国家和地区的不同市值领域的蔓延。具体来说,它通过检查20国集团股票市场的大型、中型和小型资本化指数,测试了两个危机及其阶段的特定资本化传染。对稳定期和两个危机期的分析表明,大多数国家存在更强的大市值传播渠道。另一方面,两场危机各阶段的传染动态并没有提供一个明确的模式,即在所有市场中,以特定的上限规模为基础的传染。然而,有证据表明,太平洋地区和不同地区的一些个别市场的三个上限组受到的影响较轻。此外,发达市场的所有三个上限组在ESDC的最后阶段受到的影响最大,而新兴市场和前沿市场在两次危机的各个阶段都表现出更多样化的传染模式。最后,雷曼兄弟(Lehman Brothers)的破产引发了感染率的急剧上升,而ESDC似乎比全球金融危机更具传染性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Economics Quarterly
Applied Economics Quarterly Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social and Solidarity Economy in Morocco: Cooperatives’ Behavior and Growth Exchange Rate Pass-Through, Inflation, and Monetary Policy in Egypt Do Fiscal Regimes Matter for Fiscal Sustainability in South Africa? A Markov-Switching Approach Designing GDP-Linked Bonds with Default Industrial Output Growth Forecast: A Machine Learning Approach Based on Cross-Validation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1