Heart Transplantation is Not the Only Option for Patients with Advanced Heart Failure

J. Barcena, J. Fang
{"title":"Heart Transplantation is Not the Only Option for Patients with Advanced Heart Failure","authors":"J. Barcena, J. Fang","doi":"10.3810/hp.2010.04.288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conventional therapy for advanced medically refractory heart failure is heart transplantation, but donors are limited and most patients are not candidates due to signifi cant comorbidities. Until recently, therapeutic options for such patients have been limited and, frankly, palliative. For example, medically refractory advanced heart failure patients considered ineligible for transplantation (most commonly due to age) are often treated with chronic inotropic agents, which temporize their symptoms but are associated with an alarming 10% to 30% 1-year survival rate. Ventricular assist devices (VADs), or heart pumps, have changed the therapeutic landscape for these desperate patients. The pumps are surgically implanted, electrically driven devices that complement the cardiac output of the native but weakened heart (Figure 1). They can be used to support either the left (LVAD), right (RVAD), or both (BiVAD or total artifi cial heart [TAH]) ventricles. There are currently 3 major indications for VADs in advanced heart failure. Most commonly, VADs are used as a bridge to heart transplant when a patient becomes too ill to await transplantation on inotropic agents. Randomized trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of VADs in this capacity. Less commonly, VADs are used to hemodynamically support a patient with acute systolic heart failure and shock until the native heart recovers (ie, as a bridge to recovery). Finally, these devices have been used as a permanent therapy for patients with medically refractory advanced heart failure considered ineligible for transplantation, or so-called destination therapy. It is this last indication that represents a signifi cant change in paradigm for this technology. The principle that LVADs could be used as a “destination” therapy superior to conventional medical therapy was fi rst tested in the landmark Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) study, which used a fi rst-generation pulsatile pump. This study enrolled 129 patients with severe heart failure ineligible for transplantation, with the primary endpoint being death of any cause. There was a striking 48% reduction in mortality with the use of LVADs when compared with optimal medical management as well as marked improvements in functional status. This trial led to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2002 for the HeartMate XVE LVAD (Thoratec Corp., Pleasanton, CA) to be used as a permanent solution for transplant-ineligible patients with refractory heart failure. Recent technologic advances have led to a second generation of devices that provide continuous rather than pulsatile fl ow (eg, HeartMate II [Thoratec Corp., Pleasanton, CA]), which has decreased the size of the device and increased durability. It was this latest generation of LVADs that was used in the recent destination study by Slaughter et al. In this trial, patients with advanced refractory heart failure ineligible Julio A. Barcena, MD1,2 James Fang, MD1,2","PeriodicalId":75913,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice","volume":"38 1","pages":"7 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3810/hp.2010.04.288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conventional therapy for advanced medically refractory heart failure is heart transplantation, but donors are limited and most patients are not candidates due to signifi cant comorbidities. Until recently, therapeutic options for such patients have been limited and, frankly, palliative. For example, medically refractory advanced heart failure patients considered ineligible for transplantation (most commonly due to age) are often treated with chronic inotropic agents, which temporize their symptoms but are associated with an alarming 10% to 30% 1-year survival rate. Ventricular assist devices (VADs), or heart pumps, have changed the therapeutic landscape for these desperate patients. The pumps are surgically implanted, electrically driven devices that complement the cardiac output of the native but weakened heart (Figure 1). They can be used to support either the left (LVAD), right (RVAD), or both (BiVAD or total artifi cial heart [TAH]) ventricles. There are currently 3 major indications for VADs in advanced heart failure. Most commonly, VADs are used as a bridge to heart transplant when a patient becomes too ill to await transplantation on inotropic agents. Randomized trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of VADs in this capacity. Less commonly, VADs are used to hemodynamically support a patient with acute systolic heart failure and shock until the native heart recovers (ie, as a bridge to recovery). Finally, these devices have been used as a permanent therapy for patients with medically refractory advanced heart failure considered ineligible for transplantation, or so-called destination therapy. It is this last indication that represents a signifi cant change in paradigm for this technology. The principle that LVADs could be used as a “destination” therapy superior to conventional medical therapy was fi rst tested in the landmark Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) study, which used a fi rst-generation pulsatile pump. This study enrolled 129 patients with severe heart failure ineligible for transplantation, with the primary endpoint being death of any cause. There was a striking 48% reduction in mortality with the use of LVADs when compared with optimal medical management as well as marked improvements in functional status. This trial led to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2002 for the HeartMate XVE LVAD (Thoratec Corp., Pleasanton, CA) to be used as a permanent solution for transplant-ineligible patients with refractory heart failure. Recent technologic advances have led to a second generation of devices that provide continuous rather than pulsatile fl ow (eg, HeartMate II [Thoratec Corp., Pleasanton, CA]), which has decreased the size of the device and increased durability. It was this latest generation of LVADs that was used in the recent destination study by Slaughter et al. In this trial, patients with advanced refractory heart failure ineligible Julio A. Barcena, MD1,2 James Fang, MD1,2
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏移植不是晚期心力衰竭患者的唯一选择
晚期医学难治性心力衰竭的传统治疗方法是心脏移植,但供体有限,大多数患者由于严重的合并症而不适合移植。直到最近,对这类患者的治疗选择一直有限,坦率地说,只能起到缓解作用。例如,医学上难治性晚期心力衰竭患者被认为不适合移植(最常见的原因是年龄),通常使用慢性肌力药物治疗,这可以缓解他们的症状,但1年生存率高达10%至30%。心室辅助装置(VADs)或心脏泵已经改变了这些绝望患者的治疗前景。这些泵是通过手术植入的,是一种电力驱动的装置,可以补充天然但虚弱的心脏的心输出量(图1)。它们可以用来支持左心室(LVAD),右心室(RVAD),或两个心室(BiVAD或全人工心脏[TAH])。目前晚期心力衰竭患者使用VADs有3个主要适应症。最常见的是,当患者病情严重,无法等待肌力药物移植时,vad被用作心脏移植的桥梁。随机试验已经证明了VADs在这方面的有效性。不太常见的是,VADs用于急性收缩期心力衰竭和休克患者的血液动力学支持,直到原生心脏恢复(即作为恢复的桥梁)。最后,这些装置已被用作医学上难治性晚期心力衰竭患者的永久治疗,这些患者被认为不适合移植,或所谓的目的地治疗。正是这最后一个迹象代表了该技术范式的重大变化。在具有里程碑意义的机械辅助治疗充血性心力衰竭随机评估(REMATCH)研究中,lvad可以作为优于传统药物治疗的“目的地”治疗原则首次得到验证,该研究使用了第一代脉动泵。本研究纳入了129例不适合移植的严重心力衰竭患者,主要终点为任何原因导致的死亡。与最佳医疗管理相比,使用左心室辅助装置的死亡率显著降低48%,功能状态也有显著改善。该试验导致美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)于2002年批准HeartMate XVE LVAD (Thoratec Corp., Pleasanton, CA)作为不适合移植的难治性心力衰竭患者的永久解决方案。最近的技术进步导致了第二代设备的出现,这些设备可以提供连续的而不是脉动的流动(例如HeartMate II [Thoratec Corp., Pleasanton, CA]),这减少了设备的尺寸,提高了耐用性。Slaughter等人在最近的目的地研究中使用了这种最新一代的lvad。在这项试验中,晚期难治性心力衰竭患者不符合条件的Julio A. Barcena, md1,2 James Fang, md1,2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Benign acute myositis in an adult: case-based review. Hospitalists' COVID-19 management roles in hospitals without infectious disease specialists. Cardiac rehabilitation. Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.617: host tropism, proteolytic activation, cell-cell fusion, and neutralization sensitivity. How could perioperative anxiety be addressed via surgical team communication approaches? Findings from a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1