The ‘Child as Project’ Versus the ‘Child as Gift’: Expert Imaginations of IVF and Kinship in Switzerland

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 Q4 Social Sciences Sociologus Pub Date : 2015-09-22 DOI:10.3790/SOC.65.1.11
W. D. Jong
{"title":"The ‘Child as Project’ Versus the ‘Child as Gift’: Expert Imaginations of IVF and Kinship in Switzerland","authors":"W. D. Jong","doi":"10.3790/SOC.65.1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article addresses how experts imagine family-making with IVF in Switzerland, and how their imaginations reveal the kinship rationale and the political tensions behind it. In 2008 prominent institutional representatives of reproductive medicine, reproductive health, politics and ethics took part in a public panel discussion on ‘modern reproductive medicine’ organised by the Medical Faculty at the 175 th anniversary of the University of Zurich. That discussion shows in an exemplary way, how professionals in Switzerland imagine ‘the IVF act’ through bodily substances and biomedical technologies, and how they imagine ‘social technologies’ of family-making and citizenship that are closely related to these notions of conception. It is argued in this article that the debate can be read as the staging of different and contested narratives, in particular of secular and sacred origin stories, that include a concerned conception or embryo tale and that pivot around the good ‘child as gift’ versus the bad ‘child as project’. These globally informed narratives have a strong cultural, political and economic stance, and they are driven by hopes and particularly anxieties about human reproduction, kinship and gender in Switzerland at the beginning of the 21st century.","PeriodicalId":42778,"journal":{"name":"Sociologus","volume":"65 1","pages":"11-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologus","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/SOC.65.1.11","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article addresses how experts imagine family-making with IVF in Switzerland, and how their imaginations reveal the kinship rationale and the political tensions behind it. In 2008 prominent institutional representatives of reproductive medicine, reproductive health, politics and ethics took part in a public panel discussion on ‘modern reproductive medicine’ organised by the Medical Faculty at the 175 th anniversary of the University of Zurich. That discussion shows in an exemplary way, how professionals in Switzerland imagine ‘the IVF act’ through bodily substances and biomedical technologies, and how they imagine ‘social technologies’ of family-making and citizenship that are closely related to these notions of conception. It is argued in this article that the debate can be read as the staging of different and contested narratives, in particular of secular and sacred origin stories, that include a concerned conception or embryo tale and that pivot around the good ‘child as gift’ versus the bad ‘child as project’. These globally informed narratives have a strong cultural, political and economic stance, and they are driven by hopes and particularly anxieties about human reproduction, kinship and gender in Switzerland at the beginning of the 21st century.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“儿童作为项目”与“儿童作为礼物”:瑞士体外受精和亲属关系的专家想象
这篇文章讨论了专家们如何想象在瑞士用试管婴儿制造家庭,以及他们的想象如何揭示亲属关系的基本原理和背后的政治紧张关系。2008年,生殖医学、生殖健康、政治和伦理方面的知名机构代表参加了医学院在苏黎世大学175周年校庆上组织的关于"现代生殖医学"的公开小组讨论。这一讨论以一种典型的方式展示了瑞士的专业人员如何通过身体物质和生物医学技术想象“试管婴儿行为”,以及他们如何想象与这些概念密切相关的家庭和公民身份的“社会技术”。本文认为,这场辩论可以被解读为不同的、有争议的叙事的舞台,尤其是世俗和神圣的起源故事,其中包括一个有关概念或胚胎的故事,围绕着好“孩子是礼物”和坏“孩子是工程”展开。这些全球性的叙事具有强烈的文化、政治和经济立场,它们是由21世纪初瑞士对人类生殖、亲属关系和性别的希望和焦虑所驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociologus
Sociologus Multiple-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Struggle to be an Icon. Iranian Women’s Perspectives on Female Identities in Transnational Contexts (Dis)avling Sacrifice: Veterans’ Classification in Iran Discussion Paper. The Anti-Refugee Machine: A Draft Framework for Migration Studies Tagungsbericht. „Terrains Mouvants. L’ethnologie de Hilde et Richard Thurnwald/Unsichere Felder. Hilde und Richard Thurnwalds Ethnologie/Changing Fields. Hilde And Richard Thurnwald’s Ethnology“,7.–9. Juli 2021, Paris A Bridge that Divides: Hostile Infrastructures. Coloniality and Watchfulness in San Diego, California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1