Caring for Equality? Administering Ambivalence in Kindergarten

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 Q4 Social Sciences Sociologus Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.3790/soc.70.1.39
Anna Ellmer
{"title":"Caring for Equality? Administering Ambivalence in Kindergarten","authors":"Anna Ellmer","doi":"10.3790/soc.70.1.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In recent years, kindergartens in Austria have increasingly become the target of an ambivalent politics of belonging and difference. Looking at institutional childcare practices as processes of doing and undoing differences, this article explores how kindergarten staff translate societal missions of promoting both ‘integration’ and ‘diversity’ into practice by reflecting particularly on the role of bureaucratic practices within this dynamic. Ethnographic studies on the organisational dimensions of institutional childcare have mostly focused on their normalising effects. Based on ethnographic material from two Viennese kindergartens, I show that universalist claims to childcare as a vehicle for belonging are important. Yet, care and administration in kindergarten hardly proceed in clear-cut ways. Pedagogical/bureaucratic practices unfold at the nexus of ‘formal’ and ‘informal’, as well as ‘private’ and ‘public’ spheres, mediated by an ambivalent normative universe and within limited institutional resources. Using a case of staff negotiating kinship practices in one family, the article traces their interplay and shows how bureaucratic practices become entangled with gendered constructions of cultural difference. Keywords: Bureaucracy, childcare, kinship, doing difference, gender","PeriodicalId":42778,"journal":{"name":"Sociologus","volume":"70 1","pages":"39-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologus","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.70.1.39","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, kindergartens in Austria have increasingly become the target of an ambivalent politics of belonging and difference. Looking at institutional childcare practices as processes of doing and undoing differences, this article explores how kindergarten staff translate societal missions of promoting both ‘integration’ and ‘diversity’ into practice by reflecting particularly on the role of bureaucratic practices within this dynamic. Ethnographic studies on the organisational dimensions of institutional childcare have mostly focused on their normalising effects. Based on ethnographic material from two Viennese kindergartens, I show that universalist claims to childcare as a vehicle for belonging are important. Yet, care and administration in kindergarten hardly proceed in clear-cut ways. Pedagogical/bureaucratic practices unfold at the nexus of ‘formal’ and ‘informal’, as well as ‘private’ and ‘public’ spheres, mediated by an ambivalent normative universe and within limited institutional resources. Using a case of staff negotiating kinship practices in one family, the article traces their interplay and shows how bureaucratic practices become entangled with gendered constructions of cultural difference. Keywords: Bureaucracy, childcare, kinship, doing difference, gender
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关心平等?幼儿园矛盾心理的管理
近年来,奥地利的幼儿园日益成为归属和差异的矛盾政治的目标。将机构托儿实践视为实现和消除差异的过程,本文探讨了幼儿园工作人员如何将促进“整合”和“多样性”的社会使命转化为实践,特别是通过反思官僚实践在这一动态中的作用。关于机构托儿的组织维度的民族志研究主要集中在它们的正常化效应上。基于两所维也纳幼儿园的民族志材料,我表明,普遍主义者声称儿童保育是归属感的载体是重要的。然而,幼儿园的照顾和管理很难按照明确的方式进行。教学/官僚实践在“正式”和“非正式”,以及“私人”和“公共”领域的联系中展开,由一个矛盾的规范世界和有限的制度资源调解。本文以一个家庭中工作人员协商亲属关系实践的案例为例,追溯了他们之间的相互作用,并展示了官僚实践如何与文化差异的性别结构纠缠在一起。关键词:官僚主义,托儿,亲属关系,做差异,性别
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociologus
Sociologus Multiple-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Struggle to be an Icon. Iranian Women’s Perspectives on Female Identities in Transnational Contexts (Dis)avling Sacrifice: Veterans’ Classification in Iran Discussion Paper. The Anti-Refugee Machine: A Draft Framework for Migration Studies Tagungsbericht. „Terrains Mouvants. L’ethnologie de Hilde et Richard Thurnwald/Unsichere Felder. Hilde und Richard Thurnwalds Ethnologie/Changing Fields. Hilde And Richard Thurnwald’s Ethnology“,7.–9. Juli 2021, Paris A Bridge that Divides: Hostile Infrastructures. Coloniality and Watchfulness in San Diego, California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1