Des-contextualización del derecho de acceso a la información pública por la jurisprudencia constitucional chilena. Comentarios a la Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional Rol 7425-19-INA de 19 de diciembre 2019

Q3 Social Sciences Estudios Constitucionales Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.4067/s0718-52002021000100356
Lorayne Finol Romero, Emercio Aponte Aponte
{"title":"Des-contextualización del derecho de acceso a la información pública por la jurisprudencia constitucional chilena. Comentarios a la Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional Rol 7425-19-INA de 19 de diciembre 2019","authors":"Lorayne Finol Romero, Emercio Aponte Aponte","doi":"10.4067/s0718-52002021000100356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The present commentary analyzes a judgment of the Constitutional Court that declared the inapplicability of Articles 5 and 10 of Law 20.285 on access to public information, as well as Article 31 bis of law No. 19.300 on general environmental. This ruling, as detailed in the analysis below, reproduces controversial aspects that create barriers to the effective exercise of the right of access to public information and decontextualizes the principle of transparency of the public function of the InterAmerican human rights standards.","PeriodicalId":39109,"journal":{"name":"Estudios Constitucionales","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios Constitucionales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-52002021000100356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The present commentary analyzes a judgment of the Constitutional Court that declared the inapplicability of Articles 5 and 10 of Law 20.285 on access to public information, as well as Article 31 bis of law No. 19.300 on general environmental. This ruling, as detailed in the analysis below, reproduces controversial aspects that create barriers to the effective exercise of the right of access to public information and decontextualizes the principle of transparency of the public function of the InterAmerican human rights standards.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智利宪法法理学对获取公共信息权利的解构。对宪法法院2019年12月19日第7425-19-INA号决议的评论
:本评注分析宪法法院的一项判决,该判决宣布关于获取公共信息的第20.285号法律第5条和第10条以及关于一般环境的第19.300号法律第31条之二不适用。正如下文分析所详述的那样,这项裁决再现了对有效行使获取公共信息的权利造成障碍的有争议的方面,并使美洲人权标准的公共职能的透明度原则脱离了背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Estudios Constitucionales
Estudios Constitucionales Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Collective Choice and Dissenting Opinions in Multimember Courts - Elements for Assessing Judicial Reasoning in Courts of Constitutional Decision Making in South America La Perspectiva Armonizadora de los Derechos Fundamentales en un contexto laboral: A propósito de la sentencia del Tribunal Supremo español de 6 de julio de 2022 Constituitional and human rights issues and trends in the republic of Iraq: struggling on the way Presentación El derecho a la protección de datos personales en Europa y en América: diferentes visiones para una misma realidad, Valencia (España), Tirant lo Blanch, 2021, 726 páginas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1