{"title":"Las tentaciones del constituyente","authors":"N. P. Ságüés","doi":"10.4067/s0718-52002022000300381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resumen: El constituyente puede verse tentado a ser jurídicamente autista, al plagio normativo, a confundir sus papeles de legislador excepcional con los de legislador ordinario, a ser confuso, a mentir con promesas difícilmente realizables, a imponer autoritariamente su constitución y a creer que ella es perfecta. Tales tentaciones, si se las acepta, pueden conducir a una constitución conflictuada con el derecho internacional, o con cláusulas copiadas pero impracticables, ambiguas, falsas y defectuosas. Ello produce fenómenos de fracaso, frustración, rechazo colectivo y casi segura desconstitucionalización. Palabras Poder constituyente, Tentaciones, Negación derecho internacional, Confusión de roles, Plagio, Cláusulas constitucionales confusas Abstract: The constituent can be tempted to be legally autistic, to normative plagiarism, to confuse his roles of exceptional legislator with those of ordinary legislator, to be confused, to lie with promises that are difficult to fulfill, to impose his constitution authoritatively and to believe that it is perfect. Such temptations, if accepted, can lead a constitution to conflict with international law, or with copied but impracticable, ambiguous, false and defective clauses. This produces phenomena of failure, frustration, collective rejection and almost certain “deconstitutionalization”. Confusion of roles, Plagiarism, impracticable Constitutional Constitutional","PeriodicalId":39109,"journal":{"name":"Estudios Constitucionales","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios Constitucionales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-52002022000300381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Resumen: El constituyente puede verse tentado a ser jurídicamente autista, al plagio normativo, a confundir sus papeles de legislador excepcional con los de legislador ordinario, a ser confuso, a mentir con promesas difícilmente realizables, a imponer autoritariamente su constitución y a creer que ella es perfecta. Tales tentaciones, si se las acepta, pueden conducir a una constitución conflictuada con el derecho internacional, o con cláusulas copiadas pero impracticables, ambiguas, falsas y defectuosas. Ello produce fenómenos de fracaso, frustración, rechazo colectivo y casi segura desconstitucionalización. Palabras Poder constituyente, Tentaciones, Negación derecho internacional, Confusión de roles, Plagio, Cláusulas constitucionales confusas Abstract: The constituent can be tempted to be legally autistic, to normative plagiarism, to confuse his roles of exceptional legislator with those of ordinary legislator, to be confused, to lie with promises that are difficult to fulfill, to impose his constitution authoritatively and to believe that it is perfect. Such temptations, if accepted, can lead a constitution to conflict with international law, or with copied but impracticable, ambiguous, false and defective clauses. This produces phenomena of failure, frustration, collective rejection and almost certain “deconstitutionalization”. Confusion of roles, Plagiarism, impracticable Constitutional Constitutional
在这种情况下,我们可以得出这样的结论:宪法是一种法律上的缺陷,一种规范上的缺陷,一种将特殊立法者的角色与普通立法者的角色混淆的缺陷,一种困惑的缺陷,一种用难以实现的承诺来欺骗自己的缺陷,一种独裁地强加宪法并相信它是完美的缺陷。这种诱惑如果被接受,可能会导致一部与国际法相冲突的宪法,或复制但不切实际、模棱两可、错误和有缺陷的条款。这导致了失败、沮丧、集体拒绝和几乎肯定的违宪现象。词制宪权力、诱惑、否认国际法混乱的角色混乱的宪法条款、Abstract:抄袭也是can be tempted to be污染物autistic confuse其角色、to规范plagiarism特殊议员相对普通议员,to be confused,行为数值减少容易发生内乱的promises to fulfill,一类人不得强制其constitution authoritatively and that it is perfect。这种诱惑如果得到接受,可能导致《宪法》与国际法发生冲突,或与抄袭但不切实际、模棱两可、虚假和有缺陷的条款发生冲突。这产生了失败、挫折、集体拒绝和几乎肯定的“宪法化”现象。角色混淆,剽窃,不切实际的宪法宪法