The rankability of weighted data from pairwise comparisons

IF 1.7 Q2 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED Foundations of data science (Springfield, Mo.) Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.3934/FODS.2021002
Paul E. Anderson, T. Chartier, A. Langville, Kathryn E. Pedings-Behling
{"title":"The rankability of weighted data from pairwise comparisons","authors":"Paul E. Anderson, T. Chartier, A. Langville, Kathryn E. Pedings-Behling","doi":"10.3934/FODS.2021002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In prior work [ 4 ], Anderson et al. introduced a new problem, the rankability problem, which refers to a dataset's inherent ability to produce a meaningful ranking of its items. Ranking is a fundamental data science task with numerous applications that include web search, data mining, cybersecurity, machine learning, and statistical learning theory. Yet little attention has been paid to the question of whether a dataset is suitable for ranking. As a result, when a ranking method is applied to a dataset with low rankability, the resulting ranking may not be reliable. Rankability paper [ 4 ] and its methods studied unweighted data for which the dominance relations are binary, i.e., an item either dominates or is dominated by another item. In this paper, we extend rankability methods to weighted data for which an item may dominate another by any finite amount. We present combinatorial approaches to a weighted rankability measure and apply our new measure to several weighted datasets.","PeriodicalId":73054,"journal":{"name":"Foundations of data science (Springfield, Mo.)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations of data science (Springfield, Mo.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/FODS.2021002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

In prior work [ 4 ], Anderson et al. introduced a new problem, the rankability problem, which refers to a dataset's inherent ability to produce a meaningful ranking of its items. Ranking is a fundamental data science task with numerous applications that include web search, data mining, cybersecurity, machine learning, and statistical learning theory. Yet little attention has been paid to the question of whether a dataset is suitable for ranking. As a result, when a ranking method is applied to a dataset with low rankability, the resulting ranking may not be reliable. Rankability paper [ 4 ] and its methods studied unweighted data for which the dominance relations are binary, i.e., an item either dominates or is dominated by another item. In this paper, we extend rankability methods to weighted data for which an item may dominate another by any finite amount. We present combinatorial approaches to a weighted rankability measure and apply our new measure to several weighted datasets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两两比较中加权数据的排名
在之前的工作[4]中,Anderson等人引入了一个新问题,即排名问题,这是指数据集对其项目产生有意义排名的固有能力。排名是一项基础数据科学任务,有许多应用,包括网络搜索、数据挖掘、网络安全、机器学习和统计学习理论。然而,很少有人关注数据集是否适合进行排名的问题。因此,当排名方法应用于排名性较低的数据集时,所得到的排名可能不可靠。排名论文[4]及其方法研究了优势关系为二元的未加权数据,即一个项目占主导地位或被另一个项目占主导地位。在本文中,我们将排名方法扩展到一个项目可以以任意有限的量支配另一个项目的加权数据。我们提出了加权排名度量的组合方法,并将我们的新度量应用于几个加权数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CHATGPT FOR COMPUTATIONAL TOPOLOGY. PERSISTENT PATH LAPLACIAN. Weight set decomposition for weighted rank and rating aggregation: An interpretable and visual decision support tool Hierarchical regularization networks for sparsification based learning on noisy datasets Noise calibration for SPDEs: A case study for the rotating shallow water model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1