Relation between DNA damage measured by comet assay and OGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism in antineoplastic drugs biomonitoring

C. Ladeira, S. Viegas, M. Pádua, E. Carolino, M. Gomes, M. Brito
{"title":"Relation between DNA damage measured by comet assay and OGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism in antineoplastic drugs biomonitoring","authors":"C. Ladeira, S. Viegas, M. Pádua, E. Carolino, M. Gomes, M. Brito","doi":"10.3934/genet.2015.3.204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Antineoplastic drugs are hazardous chemical agents used mostly in the treatment of patients with cancer, however health professionals that handle and administer these drugs can become exposed and develop DNA damage. Comet assay is a standard method for assessing DNA damage in human biomonitoring and, combined with formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (FPG) enzyme, it specifically detects DNA oxidative damage. The aim of this study was to investigate genotoxic effects in workers occupationally exposed to cytostatics (n = 46), as compared to a control group with no exposure (n = 46) at two Portuguese hospitals, by means of the alkaline comet assay. The potential of the OGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism as a susceptibility biomarker was also investigated. Exposure was evaluated by investigating the contamination of surfaces and genotoxic assessment was done by alkaline comet assay in peripheral blood lymphocytes. OGG1 Ser326Cys (rs1052133) polymorphism was studied by Real Time PCR. As for exposure assessment, there were 121 (37%) positive samples out of a total of 327 samples analysed from both hospitals. No statistically significant differences (Mann-Whitney test, p > 0.05) were found between subjects with and without exposure, regarding DNA damage and oxidative DNA damage, nevertheless the exposed group exhibited higher values. Moreover, there was no consistent trend regarding the variation of both biomarkers as assessed by comet assay with OGG1 polymorphism. Our study was not statistically significant regarding occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs and genetic damage assessed by comet assay. However, health professionals should be monitored for risk behaviour, in order to ensure that safety measures are applied and protection devices are used correctly.","PeriodicalId":43477,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/genet.2015.3.204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Antineoplastic drugs are hazardous chemical agents used mostly in the treatment of patients with cancer, however health professionals that handle and administer these drugs can become exposed and develop DNA damage. Comet assay is a standard method for assessing DNA damage in human biomonitoring and, combined with formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (FPG) enzyme, it specifically detects DNA oxidative damage. The aim of this study was to investigate genotoxic effects in workers occupationally exposed to cytostatics (n = 46), as compared to a control group with no exposure (n = 46) at two Portuguese hospitals, by means of the alkaline comet assay. The potential of the OGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism as a susceptibility biomarker was also investigated. Exposure was evaluated by investigating the contamination of surfaces and genotoxic assessment was done by alkaline comet assay in peripheral blood lymphocytes. OGG1 Ser326Cys (rs1052133) polymorphism was studied by Real Time PCR. As for exposure assessment, there were 121 (37%) positive samples out of a total of 327 samples analysed from both hospitals. No statistically significant differences (Mann-Whitney test, p > 0.05) were found between subjects with and without exposure, regarding DNA damage and oxidative DNA damage, nevertheless the exposed group exhibited higher values. Moreover, there was no consistent trend regarding the variation of both biomarkers as assessed by comet assay with OGG1 polymorphism. Our study was not statistically significant regarding occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs and genetic damage assessed by comet assay. However, health professionals should be monitored for risk behaviour, in order to ensure that safety measures are applied and protection devices are used correctly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
彗星法检测DNA损伤与抗肿瘤药物生物监测中OGG1 Ser326Cys多态性的关系
抗肿瘤药物是一种危险的化学制剂,主要用于癌症患者的治疗,然而,处理和施用这些药物的卫生专业人员可能会暴露并产生DNA损伤。彗星法是人类生物监测中评估DNA损伤的标准方法,它与甲酰胺嘧啶DNA糖基化酶(FPG)酶结合,可以特异性检测DNA氧化损伤。本研究的目的是通过碱性彗星试验,调查在两家葡萄牙医院职业暴露于细胞抑制剂(n = 46)的工人的遗传毒性效应,并与未暴露于细胞抑制剂的对照组(n = 46)进行比较。OGG1 Ser326Cys多态性作为易感性生物标志物的潜力也进行了研究。通过调查表面污染来评估暴露,并通过外周血淋巴细胞碱性彗星试验来评估遗传毒性。Real Time PCR检测OGG1 Ser326Cys (rs1052133)多态性。至于接触评估,在两家医院分析的总共327个样本中,有121个(37%)呈阳性。在DNA损伤和氧化性DNA损伤方面,暴露组和未暴露组之间没有统计学差异(Mann-Whitney检验,p > 0.05),但暴露组表现出更高的值。此外,在OGG1多态性的彗星测定中,这两种生物标志物的变化没有一致的趋势。我们的研究在抗肿瘤药物的职业暴露和彗星试验评估的遗传损伤方面没有统计学意义。但是,应监测卫生专业人员的危险行为,以确保采取安全措施并正确使用保护装置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AIMS Genetics
AIMS Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evidence for novel epigenetic marks within plants. The roles of genes in the bitter taste. A robust circular RNA-based prognostic signature for postoperative recurrence in stage II/III colon cancer. Re-engineering anti-CTLA-4 antibodies for enhancing cancer immunotherapy efficacy and safety PDE4B gene polymorphism in Russian patients with panic disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1