Investigation on Influence of Additional Sound on Comfortableness of Living Environment

Koji Abe, S. Takane, Sojun Sato
{"title":"Investigation on Influence of Additional Sound on Comfortableness of Living Environment","authors":"Koji Abe, S. Takane, Sojun Sato","doi":"10.4036/IIS.2015.A.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adding a sound to a certain environment is likely to be effective for design of impression there in acoustical point of view. However, until now, little is known about the effectiveness of additional sound on the change in impression. In order to investigate the effect of additional sound, an experiment was conducted by using three kinds of audio-visual materials offering three environments and five kinds of additional sounds. The audio-visual materials were respectively recorded at ‘‘forest,’’ ‘‘park,’’ and ‘‘shopping street.’’ They represent ‘‘natural,’’ ‘‘artificial green,’’ and ‘‘urban’’ environments, respectively. Five kinds of sound stimuli were respectively chosen as: ‘‘bird singing,’’ ‘‘sound of stream,’’ ‘‘roaring of waves,’’ ‘‘traffic noise,’’ and ‘‘hum of voices.’’ The former three stimuli are regarded as sounds in nature, while the latter two are regarded as artificial ones. The experiment was based on the method of paired comparison, consisting of the unprocessed original audio-visual material and that with one of the additional sounds. The subjects evaluated relative comfortableness and naturalness of each pair. Sound pressure level of the additional sound was controlled in order to discuss the influence of the loudness of the additional sound to the evaluation. The experimental results showed that the comfortableness was improved when the additional sound was ‘bird singing’ or ‘sound of stream’ categorized in the nature sound and its sound pressure level was a little lower than that at the original environment. Moreover, it was found out that the naturalness is degraded gradually for almost of the additional sound stimuli, as their sound pressure level is increased.","PeriodicalId":91087,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary information sciences","volume":"21 1","pages":"151-157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary information sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4036/IIS.2015.A.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adding a sound to a certain environment is likely to be effective for design of impression there in acoustical point of view. However, until now, little is known about the effectiveness of additional sound on the change in impression. In order to investigate the effect of additional sound, an experiment was conducted by using three kinds of audio-visual materials offering three environments and five kinds of additional sounds. The audio-visual materials were respectively recorded at ‘‘forest,’’ ‘‘park,’’ and ‘‘shopping street.’’ They represent ‘‘natural,’’ ‘‘artificial green,’’ and ‘‘urban’’ environments, respectively. Five kinds of sound stimuli were respectively chosen as: ‘‘bird singing,’’ ‘‘sound of stream,’’ ‘‘roaring of waves,’’ ‘‘traffic noise,’’ and ‘‘hum of voices.’’ The former three stimuli are regarded as sounds in nature, while the latter two are regarded as artificial ones. The experiment was based on the method of paired comparison, consisting of the unprocessed original audio-visual material and that with one of the additional sounds. The subjects evaluated relative comfortableness and naturalness of each pair. Sound pressure level of the additional sound was controlled in order to discuss the influence of the loudness of the additional sound to the evaluation. The experimental results showed that the comfortableness was improved when the additional sound was ‘bird singing’ or ‘sound of stream’ categorized in the nature sound and its sound pressure level was a little lower than that at the original environment. Moreover, it was found out that the naturalness is degraded gradually for almost of the additional sound stimuli, as their sound pressure level is increased.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
附加声对居住环境舒适度影响的研究
从声学的角度来看,在特定的环境中加入声音可能会对印象设计产生有效的影响。然而,到目前为止,人们对额外声音对印象变化的影响知之甚少。为了研究附加声音的效果,我们利用三种视听材料提供了三种环境和五种附加声音。视听资料分别在“森林”、“公园”和“购物街”进行记录。它们分别代表“自然”、“人造绿色”和“城市”环境。选择五种声音刺激分别为:“鸟鸣”、“流水声”、“海浪咆哮”、“交通噪音”和“嗡嗡声”。前三种刺激被认为是自然的声音,后两种刺激被认为是人工的声音。实验采用配对比对的方法,将未处理的原始视听材料与其中一个附加声音进行配对比对。受试者评估每一对的相对舒适度和自然度。通过对附加声声压级的控制,探讨附加声响度对评价的影响。实验结果表明,当附加声为自然声中的“鸟鸣声”或“流水声”时,其声压级略低于原始环境时,舒适性得到了改善。此外,随着声压级的增加,几乎所有附加声刺激的自然度都逐渐降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring National Refugee Policies: Recent Trends and Implications for Future Development Computational Complexity of Puzzles and Related Topics Singular limit of deterministic and stochastic reaction-diffusion systems Lecture Notes on the Singular Limit of Reaction-diffusion Systems Qualitative Properties of Solutions of Degenerate Parabolic Equations via Energy Approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1