The perspectives of stakeholders on the effectiveness of green financing schemes in Malaysia

IF 5.5 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Green Finance Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3934/gf.2022.2022022
Raja Elyn Maryam Raja Ezuma, Nitanan Koshy Matthew
{"title":"The perspectives of stakeholders on the effectiveness of green financing schemes in Malaysia","authors":"Raja Elyn Maryam Raja Ezuma, Nitanan Koshy Matthew","doi":"10.3934/gf.2022.2022022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Growing concerns of climate crisis mitigation in Malaysia over the decades have created pressure for public listed companies and small and medium enterprises in the country to adopt a different approach in their business operations. Green financing schemes such as the Environmental,Social and Governance (ESG) indicator,the FTSE4Good index by the regulatory body Bursa Malaysia for public listed companies and the Green Technology Financing Scheme stemming from the National Green Technology Policy by the Malaysian Green Technology and Climate Change Centre,address the need to improve operations sustainably through financing. Based on interviews with government agencies and public listed companies,this paper presents the effectiveness of the guidelines and schemes in place from their perspectives. The value drivers,challenges and impact from adhering to the FTSE4Good index were discovered. Findings found that the government is a central player in ensuring the initiatives' effectiveness. Although there have been improvements over the years in the industry since its introduction,barriers are still lingering that may hamper the extent of the initiatives' effectiveness. Suggestions are made as a feedback mechanism for improved green financing towards Malaysia's aspiration on becoming a high-income nation by 2025 and in support of the Sustainable Development Goal 9: Industrial innovation and infrastructure. To realise that aspiration,every player in the industry plays a critical role in greener operations,including the small and medium enterprises.","PeriodicalId":41466,"journal":{"name":"Green Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/gf.2022.2022022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Growing concerns of climate crisis mitigation in Malaysia over the decades have created pressure for public listed companies and small and medium enterprises in the country to adopt a different approach in their business operations. Green financing schemes such as the Environmental,Social and Governance (ESG) indicator,the FTSE4Good index by the regulatory body Bursa Malaysia for public listed companies and the Green Technology Financing Scheme stemming from the National Green Technology Policy by the Malaysian Green Technology and Climate Change Centre,address the need to improve operations sustainably through financing. Based on interviews with government agencies and public listed companies,this paper presents the effectiveness of the guidelines and schemes in place from their perspectives. The value drivers,challenges and impact from adhering to the FTSE4Good index were discovered. Findings found that the government is a central player in ensuring the initiatives' effectiveness. Although there have been improvements over the years in the industry since its introduction,barriers are still lingering that may hamper the extent of the initiatives' effectiveness. Suggestions are made as a feedback mechanism for improved green financing towards Malaysia's aspiration on becoming a high-income nation by 2025 and in support of the Sustainable Development Goal 9: Industrial innovation and infrastructure. To realise that aspiration,every player in the industry plays a critical role in greener operations,including the small and medium enterprises.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利益相关者对马来西亚绿色融资计划有效性的看法
几十年来,马来西亚对缓解气候危机的关注日益增加,这给该国的上市公司和中小企业带来了压力,要求它们在业务运营中采取不同的做法。绿色融资计划,如环境、社会和治理(ESG)指标、马来西亚证券交易所监管机构为上市公司制定的FTSE4Good指数,以及马来西亚绿色技术和气候变化中心根据国家绿色技术政策制定的绿色技术融资计划,解决了通过融资改善可持续运营的需求。本文基于对政府机构和上市公司的访谈,从他们的角度展示了指导方针和方案的有效性。我们发现了坚持FTSE4Good指数的价值驱动因素、挑战和影响。调查结果显示,政府在确保这些措施的有效性方面发挥着核心作用。尽管自引入以来,该行业多年来已经有所改善,但仍存在一些障碍,可能会阻碍该举措的有效性。建议作为反馈机制,以改善绿色融资,以实现马来西亚到2025年成为高收入国家的愿望,并支持可持续发展目标9:工业创新和基础设施。为了实现这一目标,业界的每一个参与者,包括中小型企业,都在绿色运营方面发挥着至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Green Finance
Green Finance Multiple-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.50%
发文量
14
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Green Finance is an international, interdisciplinary Open Access journal dedicated to green finance, environmental, and sustainability research and practice. It offers a platform for publishing original contributions and technical reviews on green finance and related topics, following a rigorous peer-review process. Accepted article types include original research, reviews, editorials, letters, and conference reports.
期刊最新文献
Prospects of green financing in democratic societies Insuring a greener future: How green insurance drives investment in sustainable projects in developing countries? Cultural context, organizational performance and Sustainable Development Goals: A pending task Does corporate reputation play a mediating role in the association between manufacturing companies' corporate social responsibility (CSR) and financial performance? Financing low-carbon hydrogen: The role of public policies and strategies in the EU, UK and USA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1