Teachers’ perceptions about collaboration as a strategy to address key concepts in mathematics

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH South African Journal of Childhood Education Pub Date : 2022-07-21 DOI:10.4102/sajce.v12i1.952
S. A. Tachie
{"title":"Teachers’ perceptions about collaboration as a strategy to address key concepts in mathematics","authors":"S. A. Tachie","doi":"10.4102/sajce.v12i1.952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of the study is to investigate teachers’ perceptions about peer collaborative work in designing lessons as a team helped them to identify threshold concepts in the teaching and learning of foundation phase mathematics in Motheo District of Education.Methods: A qualitative approach, with a case study design, was used to combine data from observation and focus group discussions, interviews and group task sheets.Classroom observation was conducted during a workshop conducted by a subject advisor from the Motheo District of Education in collaboration with the researcher. Teachers were purposively selected from seven schools in the Motheo District of Education based on cluster sampling as a way of reviving their professional development through acquisition of mathematical teaching skills involving innovative approaches to teaching and learning of early childhood mathematics. Seven mathematics teachers, one from each school, were interviewed during the workshop.Results: Underpinned by a collaborative theory, the findings of the study revealed that peer collaboration in mathematics teaching was key to helping them (participant teachers) identify threshold concepts in mathematics that they had initially found difficult as individual teachers. This assisted them in teaching the subject effectively at the foundation phase level. The study, furthermore, established that collaboration by mathematics teachers was necessary in order to overcome the paucity of global mathematics teaching skills for early childhood mathematics, to foster learners’ knowledge of mathematical concepts and to stimulate their interest in the subject.Conclusion: It is recommended that more structured collaborative work amongst teachers in general should be encouraged to enable teachers overcome the problem of content gap in their area of specialisation.","PeriodicalId":55958,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Childhood Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Childhood Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v12i1.952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study is to investigate teachers’ perceptions about peer collaborative work in designing lessons as a team helped them to identify threshold concepts in the teaching and learning of foundation phase mathematics in Motheo District of Education.Methods: A qualitative approach, with a case study design, was used to combine data from observation and focus group discussions, interviews and group task sheets.Classroom observation was conducted during a workshop conducted by a subject advisor from the Motheo District of Education in collaboration with the researcher. Teachers were purposively selected from seven schools in the Motheo District of Education based on cluster sampling as a way of reviving their professional development through acquisition of mathematical teaching skills involving innovative approaches to teaching and learning of early childhood mathematics. Seven mathematics teachers, one from each school, were interviewed during the workshop.Results: Underpinned by a collaborative theory, the findings of the study revealed that peer collaboration in mathematics teaching was key to helping them (participant teachers) identify threshold concepts in mathematics that they had initially found difficult as individual teachers. This assisted them in teaching the subject effectively at the foundation phase level. The study, furthermore, established that collaboration by mathematics teachers was necessary in order to overcome the paucity of global mathematics teaching skills for early childhood mathematics, to foster learners’ knowledge of mathematical concepts and to stimulate their interest in the subject.Conclusion: It is recommended that more structured collaborative work amongst teachers in general should be encouraged to enable teachers overcome the problem of content gap in their area of specialisation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师对合作作为解决数学关键概念的策略的看法
背景:本研究的目的是调查教师对同伴合作设计课程的看法,因为一个团队帮助他们识别基础阶段数学教学中的阈值概念。方法:采用定性方法,结合案例研究设计,将观察和焦点小组讨论、访谈和小组任务单的数据结合起来。课堂观察是在由Motheo教育区的学科顾问与研究人员合作举办的研讨会期间进行的。基于整群抽样,我们从Motheo教育区的七所学校中有针对性地选择了教师,通过获得数学教学技能,包括创新的幼儿数学教学方法,重振他们的专业发展。工作坊期间,每所学校有一位数学老师接受了采访。结果:在合作理论的基础上,研究结果揭示了数学教学中的同伴合作是帮助他们(参与教师)识别数学阈值概念的关键,这些概念最初是他们作为单独教师发现的困难。这有助于他们在基础阶段有效地教授这门学科。此外,该研究还表明,为了克服全球幼儿数学教学技能的缺乏,培养学习者对数学概念的认识,激发他们对这门学科的兴趣,数学教师之间的合作是必要的。结论:建议鼓励教师之间更结构化的协作工作,使教师能够克服其专业领域的内容差距问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Childhood Education
South African Journal of Childhood Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Parental involvement in the case of primary school children with autism during COVID-19 Investigating critical citizenship education within primary school art curriculum South African teachers work with division actions in Grade 3 Enhancing visual-motor integration and visual perception of 6-year-old children School readiness in South Africa: Concept analysis and plain language summary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1