Analysis of Students’ Misconception Based on Rough Set Theory

T. Sheu, Tzu-Liang Chen, Ching-Pin Tsai, J. Tzeng, C. Deng, M. Nagai
{"title":"Analysis of Students’ Misconception Based on Rough Set Theory","authors":"T. Sheu, Tzu-Liang Chen, Ching-Pin Tsai, J. Tzeng, C. Deng, M. Nagai","doi":"10.4236/JILSA.2013.52008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study analyzed students’ misconception based on rough set theory \nand combined with interpretive structural model (ISM) to compare students’ \ndegree of two classes. The study then has provided an effective diagnostic \nassessment tool for teachers. The participants were 30 fourth grade students in Central Taiwan, and the exam tools were produced by teachers for math exams. The \nstudy has proposed three methods to get common misconception of the students in \nclass. These methods are “Deleting conditional attributes”, “Using Boolean \nlogic to calculate discernable matrix”, and “Calculating significance of \nconditional attributes.” The results showed that students of Class A had common \nmisconceptions but students of Class B had not common misconception. In \naddition, the remedial decision-making for these two classes of students is \npointed out. While remedial decision-making of two classes corresponded to \nstructural graph of concepts, it can be found the overall performance of the \nClass B was higher than Class A.","PeriodicalId":69452,"journal":{"name":"智能学习系统与应用(英文)","volume":"2013 1","pages":"67-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"智能学习系统与应用(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/JILSA.2013.52008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The study analyzed students’ misconception based on rough set theory and combined with interpretive structural model (ISM) to compare students’ degree of two classes. The study then has provided an effective diagnostic assessment tool for teachers. The participants were 30 fourth grade students in Central Taiwan, and the exam tools were produced by teachers for math exams. The study has proposed three methods to get common misconception of the students in class. These methods are “Deleting conditional attributes”, “Using Boolean logic to calculate discernable matrix”, and “Calculating significance of conditional attributes.” The results showed that students of Class A had common misconceptions but students of Class B had not common misconception. In addition, the remedial decision-making for these two classes of students is pointed out. While remedial decision-making of two classes corresponded to structural graph of concepts, it can be found the overall performance of the Class B was higher than Class A.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于粗糙集理论的学生误解分析
本研究基于粗糙集理论,结合解释结构模型(ISM)对学生的误解进行分析,比较两班学生的程度。本研究为教师提供了一种有效的诊断评估工具。研究对象为30名中部地区的四年级学生,考试工具由教师制作,用于数学考试。该研究提出了三种方法来了解学生在课堂上常见的误解。这三种方法分别是“删除条件属性”、“使用布尔逻辑计算可分辨矩阵”和“计算条件属性的重要性”。结果表明,A班学生存在普遍的误解,而B班学生没有普遍的误解。此外,还指出了这两类学生的补救决策。虽然两个班级的补救决策对应于概念结构图,但可以发现B班级的整体表现高于A班级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
期刊最新文献
Architecting the Metaverse: Blockchain and the Financial and Legal Regulatory Challenges of Virtual Real Estate A Proposed Meta-Reality Immersive Development Pipeline: Generative AI Models and Extended Reality (XR) Content for the Metaverse A Comparison of PPO, TD3 and SAC Reinforcement Algorithms for Quadruped Walking Gait Generation Multiple Collaborative Service Model and System Construction Based on Industrial Competitive Intelligence Skin Cancer Classification Using Transfer Learning by VGG16 Architecture (Case Study on Kaggle Dataset)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1