Majority Voting Ransomware Detection System

Simon R. Davies, Richard Macfarlane, W. Buchanan
{"title":"Majority Voting Ransomware Detection System","authors":"Simon R. Davies, Richard Macfarlane, W. Buchanan","doi":"10.4236/jis.2023.144016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crypto-ransomware remains a significant threat to governments and companies alike, with high-profile cyber security incidents regularly making head-lines. Many different detection systems have been proposed as solutions to the ever-changing dynamic landscape of ransomware detection. In the majority of cases, these described systems propose a method based on the result of a single test performed on either the executable code, the process under investigation, its behaviour, or its output. In a small subset of ransomware detection systems, the concept of a scorecard is employed where multiple tests are performed on various aspects of a process under investigation and their re-sults are then analysed using machine learning. The purpose of this paper is to propose a new majority voting approach to ransomware detection by developing a method that uses a cumulative score derived from discrete tests based on calculations using algorithmic rather than heuristic techniques. The paper describes 23 candidate tests, as well as 9 Windows API tests which are validated to determine both their accuracy and viability for use within a ran-somware detection system. Using a cumulative score calculation approach to ransomware detection has several benefits, such as the immunity to the occasional inaccuracy of individual tests when making its final classification. The system can also leverage multiple tests that can be both comprehensive and complimentary in an attempt to achieve a broader, deeper, and more robust analysis of the program under investigation. Additionally, the use of multiple collaborative tests also significantly hinders ransomware from masking or modifying its behaviour in an attempt to bypass detection. The results achieved by this research demonstrate that many of the proposed tests achieved a high degree of accuracy in differentiating between benign and malicious targets and suggestions are offered as to how these tests, and combinations of tests, could be adapted to further improve the detection accuracy.","PeriodicalId":57259,"journal":{"name":"信息安全(英文)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"信息安全(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jis.2023.144016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crypto-ransomware remains a significant threat to governments and companies alike, with high-profile cyber security incidents regularly making head-lines. Many different detection systems have been proposed as solutions to the ever-changing dynamic landscape of ransomware detection. In the majority of cases, these described systems propose a method based on the result of a single test performed on either the executable code, the process under investigation, its behaviour, or its output. In a small subset of ransomware detection systems, the concept of a scorecard is employed where multiple tests are performed on various aspects of a process under investigation and their re-sults are then analysed using machine learning. The purpose of this paper is to propose a new majority voting approach to ransomware detection by developing a method that uses a cumulative score derived from discrete tests based on calculations using algorithmic rather than heuristic techniques. The paper describes 23 candidate tests, as well as 9 Windows API tests which are validated to determine both their accuracy and viability for use within a ran-somware detection system. Using a cumulative score calculation approach to ransomware detection has several benefits, such as the immunity to the occasional inaccuracy of individual tests when making its final classification. The system can also leverage multiple tests that can be both comprehensive and complimentary in an attempt to achieve a broader, deeper, and more robust analysis of the program under investigation. Additionally, the use of multiple collaborative tests also significantly hinders ransomware from masking or modifying its behaviour in an attempt to bypass detection. The results achieved by this research demonstrate that many of the proposed tests achieved a high degree of accuracy in differentiating between benign and malicious targets and suggestions are offered as to how these tests, and combinations of tests, could be adapted to further improve the detection accuracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多数投票勒索软件检测系统
加密勒索软件对政府和企业都是一个重大威胁,备受瞩目的网络安全事件经常成为头条新闻。许多不同的检测系统已经被提出作为不断变化的勒索软件检测动态景观的解决方案。在大多数情况下,这些描述的系统根据对可执行代码、被调查的过程、其行为或其输出执行的单个测试的结果提出一种方法。在勒索软件检测系统的一小部分中,采用记分卡的概念,对正在调查的过程的各个方面执行多个测试,然后使用机器学习分析其结果。本文的目的是通过开发一种方法来提出一种新的多数投票方法来检测勒索软件,该方法使用基于算法而不是启发式技术计算的离散测试得出的累积分数。本文描述了23个候选测试,以及9个经过验证的Windows API测试,以确定它们在反软件检测系统中使用的准确性和可行性。使用累积分数计算方法进行勒索软件检测有几个好处,例如在进行最终分类时,可以避免个别测试偶尔出现的不准确性。系统还可以利用多种测试,这些测试既全面又互补,以尝试实现对所调查的程序的更广泛、更深入和更健壮的分析。此外,多重协作测试的使用也大大阻碍了勒索软件掩盖或修改其行为以试图绕过检测。本研究的结果表明,许多提出的测试在区分良性和恶意目标方面达到了很高的准确性,并就如何调整这些测试以及测试组合以进一步提高检测准确性提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
211
期刊最新文献
Secure Web Application Technologies Implementation through Hardening Security Headers Using Automated Threat Modelling Techniques Research and Practice on High Availability Scheme of Unified Identity Authentication System Based on CAS in Colleges and Universities Learning with Errors Public Key Cryptosystem with Its Security User Station Security Protection Method Based on Random Domain Name Detection and Active Defense Towards a New Model for the Production of Civil Status Records Using Blockchain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1