SENSITIVITY OF VARIOUS METHODS FOR DETECTING HLA CLASS I ANTIBODIES AND SCREENING FOR ALLOANTIBODIES IN 145 SERA SAMPLES FROM PATIENTS RECEIVING PLATELET TRANSFUSIONS:A COMPARISON OF AHG‑LCT LIFT PIFT MAGNETIC MPHA AND FlowPRA METHODS

S. Saito, M. Ota, Y. Katsuyama, H. Makishima, T. Tamai, K. Takayanagi, H. Asamura, H. Fukushima
{"title":"SENSITIVITY OF VARIOUS METHODS FOR DETECTING HLA CLASS I ANTIBODIES AND SCREENING FOR ALLOANTIBODIES IN 145 SERA SAMPLES FROM PATIENTS RECEIVING PLATELET TRANSFUSIONS:A COMPARISON OF AHG‑LCT LIFT PIFT MAGNETIC MPHA AND FlowPRA METHODS","authors":"S. Saito, M. Ota, Y. Katsuyama, H. Makishima, T. Tamai, K. Takayanagi, H. Asamura, H. Fukushima","doi":"10.3925/JJTC1958.50.753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A total of 15 distinct human sera that did not exhibit reactivity against HPA antibodies but contained HLA-specific antibodies were used for sensitivity analysis of the AHG-LCT, LIFT, PIFT, M-MPHA and FlowPRA methods. The HLA antibody titer of each serum sample was defined as the highest dilution of serum that became positive to each method. 145 sera samples from patients receiving platelet transfusions were also screened to detect HLA antibodies by these methods. Results showed that FlowPRA was the most sensitive for identifying HLA antibodies. Although FCM is generally considered the most sensitive method, our analysis suggests that M-MPHA is as useful as FCM in both sensitivity and screening tests. PIFT sensitivity was slightly less than that of LIFT and M-MPHA. AHG-LCT sensitivity was significantly less than that of the other methods.","PeriodicalId":86521,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Yuketsu Gakkai zasshi = Journal of the Japan Society of Blood Transfusion","volume":"50 1","pages":"753-760"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Yuketsu Gakkai zasshi = Journal of the Japan Society of Blood Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3925/JJTC1958.50.753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A total of 15 distinct human sera that did not exhibit reactivity against HPA antibodies but contained HLA-specific antibodies were used for sensitivity analysis of the AHG-LCT, LIFT, PIFT, M-MPHA and FlowPRA methods. The HLA antibody titer of each serum sample was defined as the highest dilution of serum that became positive to each method. 145 sera samples from patients receiving platelet transfusions were also screened to detect HLA antibodies by these methods. Results showed that FlowPRA was the most sensitive for identifying HLA antibodies. Although FCM is generally considered the most sensitive method, our analysis suggests that M-MPHA is as useful as FCM in both sensitivity and screening tests. PIFT sensitivity was slightly less than that of LIFT and M-MPHA. AHG-LCT sensitivity was significantly less than that of the other methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
145例接受血小板输注的患者血清样本中检测HLA I类抗体和筛选同种异体抗体的各种方法的敏感性:AHG - LCT LIFT PIFT磁性MPHA和FlowPRA方法的比较
共有15种不同的人血清对HPA抗体没有反应性,但含有hla特异性抗体,用于AHG-LCT、LIFT、PIFT、M-MPHA和FlowPRA方法的敏感性分析。每种血清样品的HLA抗体滴度被定义为每种方法呈阳性的血清的最高稀释度。145例接受血小板输注患者的血清样本也通过这些方法筛选检测HLA抗体。结果表明,FlowPRA对HLA抗体最敏感。虽然FCM通常被认为是最敏感的方法,但我们的分析表明,M-MPHA在敏感性和筛选试验中与FCM一样有用。PIFT的敏感性略低于LIFT和M-MPHA。AHG-LCT的敏感性明显低于其他方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE EFFECT OF GLYCEROL-3-PHOSPHATE ON STORAGE OF CPD PRESERVED WHOLE BLOOD THE DISTRIBUTION OF HLA-A, B, C, Bf, C4 AND TWO LOCUS ASSOCIATION OF HEALTHY APHERESIS DONNOR IN YAMAGUCHI PREFECTURE, WESTERN AREA OF JAPAN RE-EXAMINATION OF BERNSTEIN'S CORRECTIONS TO THE MULTI-ALLELOMORPHISM IN THE ABO BLOOD GROUPS CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF SERIAL EXAMINATION OF ANTI HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS ( HIV ) ANTIBODY AND HIV ANTIGEN IN HEMOPHILIACS WITH HIV INFECTION A NEW ADDITIVE SOLUTION CONTAINING PHOSPHOENOLPYRUVATE (PEP) FOR PLASMA AND LEUKOCYTE POOR RED CELL CONCENTRATES I. PEP for Red Cells Preservation as a Protein-Free-Medium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1