Stakeholder inclusiveness in sustainability reporting by mining companies listed on the Johannesburg securities exchange

IF 0.6 Q4 BUSINESS African Journal of Business Ethics Pub Date : 2014-07-01 DOI:10.4103/1817-7417.86024
Deirdré Lingenfelder, Adèle Thomas
{"title":"Stakeholder inclusiveness in sustainability reporting by mining companies listed on the Johannesburg securities exchange","authors":"Deirdré Lingenfelder, Adèle Thomas","doi":"10.4103/1817-7417.86024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A key requirement for listing on the Johannesburg Securities Exchange (JSE) Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) index is the publication, by companies, of annual sustainability reports in line with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines that require stakeholders to be included in defining the content of such reports. Despite this requirement, stakeholders appear not to be integrally involved in the process. The primary objective of the study was to determine whether the contents of sustainability reports of the mining companies listed on the JSE SRI index are based on the outcome of robust stakeholder engagement processes undertaken specifically for the purpose of preparing these reports. Against a backdrop of the GRI requirements, a quantitative evaluation was undertaken of recent sustainability reports of 11 South African mining companies. These reports were also qualitatively assessed against the corporate social responsibility (CSR) Journey Model proposed by Mirvis and Googins (2006). The two assessment scores for each mining company were integrated and the companies were plotted according to a CSR journey that encompasses degrees of stakeholder involvement. The findings highlight that while the companies adhere to the quantitative GRI stakeholder engagement requirements, the contents of the sustainability reports have not been specifically informed by stakeholders. Companies also appear to be in the early stages of the CSR journey. Recommendations include advising mining companies to utilise existing stakeholder engagement platforms to advance stakeholder inclusion in sustainability reporting and for mining companies to engage in developing the business case for CSR, which could promote greater stakeholder involvement.","PeriodicalId":42425,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Business Ethics","volume":"5 1","pages":"1 - 13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Business Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1817-7417.86024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

A key requirement for listing on the Johannesburg Securities Exchange (JSE) Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) index is the publication, by companies, of annual sustainability reports in line with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines that require stakeholders to be included in defining the content of such reports. Despite this requirement, stakeholders appear not to be integrally involved in the process. The primary objective of the study was to determine whether the contents of sustainability reports of the mining companies listed on the JSE SRI index are based on the outcome of robust stakeholder engagement processes undertaken specifically for the purpose of preparing these reports. Against a backdrop of the GRI requirements, a quantitative evaluation was undertaken of recent sustainability reports of 11 South African mining companies. These reports were also qualitatively assessed against the corporate social responsibility (CSR) Journey Model proposed by Mirvis and Googins (2006). The two assessment scores for each mining company were integrated and the companies were plotted according to a CSR journey that encompasses degrees of stakeholder involvement. The findings highlight that while the companies adhere to the quantitative GRI stakeholder engagement requirements, the contents of the sustainability reports have not been specifically informed by stakeholders. Companies also appear to be in the early stages of the CSR journey. Recommendations include advising mining companies to utilise existing stakeholder engagement platforms to advance stakeholder inclusion in sustainability reporting and for mining companies to engage in developing the business case for CSR, which could promote greater stakeholder involvement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在约翰内斯堡证券交易所上市的矿业公司可持续发展报告中的利益相关者包容性
在约翰内斯堡证券交易所(JSE)社会责任投资(SRI)指数上市的一个关键要求是,公司发布符合全球报告倡议组织(GRI)指导方针的年度可持续发展报告,该指导方针要求将利益相关者包括在定义此类报告的内容中。尽管有这个要求,涉众似乎并没有完整地参与到这个过程中。本研究的主要目的是确定在JSE SRI指数上上市的矿业公司的可持续发展报告的内容是否基于专门为编写这些报告而进行的强有力的利益相关者参与过程的结果。在全球资源指数要求的背景下,对11家南非矿业公司最近的可持续性报告进行了数量评价。这些报告还根据Mirvis和Googins(2006)提出的企业社会责任(CSR)旅程模型进行了定性评估。对每个矿业公司的两个评估分数进行了整合,并根据包含利益相关者参与程度的企业社会责任旅程绘制了这些公司。研究结果强调,虽然公司遵守量化GRI利益相关者参与要求,但可持续发展报告的内容并未得到利益相关者的具体告知。企业似乎还处于企业社会责任旅程的早期阶段。建议包括建议矿业公司利用现有的利益相关者参与平台,推动利益相关者参与可持续发展报告,并建议矿业公司参与制定企业社会责任的商业案例,这可以促进更多的利益相关者参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Strong business–state alliances at the expense of labour rights in Ethiopia’s apparel-exporting industrial parks From feasting to fasting: An autoethnography of Njangis The use of non-financial performance metrics in determining directors’ remuneration: The case of listed companies in South Africa The predicament of the unprotected: Why lack-lustre legislation fails South African whistleblowers Occupational health and safety in small businesses: The rationale behind compliance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1