Comparison of Knowledge Retention after the Use of a Virtual Patient versus a High-Fidelity Physical Simulator and Traditional Training

K. Ketev, Isabelle Rash, Milena Sandeva, Blagoi Marinov, M. Bosheva, K. Qayumi
{"title":"Comparison of Knowledge Retention after the Use of a Virtual Patient versus a High-Fidelity Physical Simulator and Traditional Training","authors":"K. Ketev, Isabelle Rash, Milena Sandeva, Blagoi Marinov, M. Bosheva, K. Qayumi","doi":"10.4236/ce.2023.146077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This research assesses the effect of a virtual patient simulation platform CyberPatient (CP) compared to a high-fidelity physical simulator SimJunior (SJ) and traditional bedside training (TBT) on knowledge retention and competencies in a health education environment. Material: A total of 143 fifth-year medical students were randomly assigned to three groups: TBT-Group (n = 55) received traditional education; CP-Group (n = 44) was trained with a virtual patient platform CyberPatient; and SJ-Group (n = 44) was trained us-ing a high-fidelity simulator SimJunior. Educational content for all groups included competencies on pediatric asthma. Methods: Students’ level of knowledge acquisition was measured with a multiple-choice question test (MCQ) administered before the application of educational methods (Assessment I), immediately after completion of pediatric asthma training (Assessment II), and knowledge retention was measured two","PeriodicalId":90814,"journal":{"name":"Creative education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Creative education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2023.146077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This research assesses the effect of a virtual patient simulation platform CyberPatient (CP) compared to a high-fidelity physical simulator SimJunior (SJ) and traditional bedside training (TBT) on knowledge retention and competencies in a health education environment. Material: A total of 143 fifth-year medical students were randomly assigned to three groups: TBT-Group (n = 55) received traditional education; CP-Group (n = 44) was trained with a virtual patient platform CyberPatient; and SJ-Group (n = 44) was trained us-ing a high-fidelity simulator SimJunior. Educational content for all groups included competencies on pediatric asthma. Methods: Students’ level of knowledge acquisition was measured with a multiple-choice question test (MCQ) administered before the application of educational methods (Assessment I), immediately after completion of pediatric asthma training (Assessment II), and knowledge retention was measured two
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用虚拟病人、高保真物理模拟器和传统训练后知识保留的比较
目的:本研究评估了虚拟患者模拟平台CyberPatient (CP)与高保真物理模拟器SimJunior (SJ)和传统床边培训(TBT)在健康教育环境中对知识保留和能力的影响。资料:143名五年级医学生随机分为三组:接受传统教育的tbt组(n = 55);cp组(n = 44)使用虚拟患者平台CyberPatient进行培训;sj组(n = 44)使用高保真模拟器SimJunior进行训练。所有组的教育内容包括儿童哮喘能力。方法:采用多项选择题测试(MCQ)测量学生在应用教育方法前(评估一)和完成儿科哮喘培训后(评估二)的知识获取水平,并测量知识保留水平
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social Emotional Learning in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Opportunities and Challenges Reflections on Bank Credit Certification for Vocational Education Credits Surviving a Calculus Class during the Pandemic: Affordances and Constraints of a Fully Modular Instruction Class Outlook on Common U.S. Health Care Occupations: Benefits, Costs and Future Trends Complementary Approaches, Stress Management Practices for Future Physicians, a Way to Cultivate a “Savoir-Être” and Contribute to Becoming a Better Physician?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1