Identification of Potential Prognosticators for Sepsis through Expression Analysis of Transcriptomic Data from Sepsis Survivors and Nonsurvivors.

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES European Planning Studies Pub Date : 2023-07-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.47895/amp.vi0.3934
Ma Carmela P Dela Cruz, Joseph Romeo O Paner, Jose B Nevado
{"title":"Identification of Potential Prognosticators for Sepsis through Expression Analysis of Transcriptomic Data from Sepsis Survivors and Nonsurvivors.","authors":"Ma Carmela P Dela Cruz, Joseph Romeo O Paner, Jose B Nevado","doi":"10.47895/amp.vi0.3934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infection can be severely complicated by a dysregulated, whole-body inflammatory response known as sepsis. While previous research showed that genetic predisposition is linked to outcome differences, current patient characterization fails to determine which septic patients have greater tendencies to develop into severe sepsis or go into septic shock. As such, the identification of prognostic biomarkers may assist in identifying these high-risk patients and help improve the clinical management of the disease.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we aimed to identify molecular patterns involved in sepsis. We also aimed to identify essential genes associated with the disease's survival which could serve as potential prognosticators for the disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used weighted gene co-expression analysis (WGCNA) to analyze GSE63042, an RNA expression dataset from 129 patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis, including 78 sepsis survivors and 28 sepsis nonsurvivors. This analysis included identifying gene modules that differentiate sepsis survivors from nonsurvivors and qualitatively assessing differentially expressed genes. We then used STRING's protein-protein interaction and gene ontology analysis to determine the functional and pathway relationships of the genes in the top modules. Lastly, we assessed the prognosticator abilities of the hub genes using ROC analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found four diverse co-expression gene modules significantly associated with sepsis survival. Our differential gene expression analysis, combined with protein-protein interaction and gene ontology analysis, revealed that the hub genes of these modules - <i>TAF10, SNAPIN, PSME2, PSMB9, JUNB</i>, and <i>CEBPD -</i> may serve as candidate markers for sepsis prognosis. These markers were significantly downregulated in sepsis nonsurvivors compared with sepsis survivors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Weighted gene co-expression analysis, gene ontology enrichment analysis, and proteinprotein network interaction analysis of transcriptomic data from sepsis survivors and nonsurvivors revealed <i>TAF10, SNAPIN, PSME2, PSMB9, JUNB</i>, and <i>CEBPD</i> as potential biomarkers for sepsis prognosis. These genes are associated with functions related to proper immune response, and their downregulation in sepsis nonsurvivors suggests eventual immune exhaustion in late sepsis. Further analyses, however, are necessary to validate their roles in sepsis progression and patient survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":48292,"journal":{"name":"European Planning Studies","volume":"30 1","pages":"11-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11522635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Planning Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.vi0.3934","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infection can be severely complicated by a dysregulated, whole-body inflammatory response known as sepsis. While previous research showed that genetic predisposition is linked to outcome differences, current patient characterization fails to determine which septic patients have greater tendencies to develop into severe sepsis or go into septic shock. As such, the identification of prognostic biomarkers may assist in identifying these high-risk patients and help improve the clinical management of the disease.

Objective: In this study, we aimed to identify molecular patterns involved in sepsis. We also aimed to identify essential genes associated with the disease's survival which could serve as potential prognosticators for the disease.

Methods: We used weighted gene co-expression analysis (WGCNA) to analyze GSE63042, an RNA expression dataset from 129 patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis, including 78 sepsis survivors and 28 sepsis nonsurvivors. This analysis included identifying gene modules that differentiate sepsis survivors from nonsurvivors and qualitatively assessing differentially expressed genes. We then used STRING's protein-protein interaction and gene ontology analysis to determine the functional and pathway relationships of the genes in the top modules. Lastly, we assessed the prognosticator abilities of the hub genes using ROC analysis.

Results: We found four diverse co-expression gene modules significantly associated with sepsis survival. Our differential gene expression analysis, combined with protein-protein interaction and gene ontology analysis, revealed that the hub genes of these modules - TAF10, SNAPIN, PSME2, PSMB9, JUNB, and CEBPD - may serve as candidate markers for sepsis prognosis. These markers were significantly downregulated in sepsis nonsurvivors compared with sepsis survivors.

Conclusion: Weighted gene co-expression analysis, gene ontology enrichment analysis, and proteinprotein network interaction analysis of transcriptomic data from sepsis survivors and nonsurvivors revealed TAF10, SNAPIN, PSME2, PSMB9, JUNB, and CEBPD as potential biomarkers for sepsis prognosis. These genes are associated with functions related to proper immune response, and their downregulation in sepsis nonsurvivors suggests eventual immune exhaustion in late sepsis. Further analyses, however, are necessary to validate their roles in sepsis progression and patient survival.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过对败血症幸存者和非幸存者的转录组数据进行表达分析,确定败血症的潜在预后指标。
背景:感染可能会因全身炎症反应失调而严重并发败血症。以往的研究表明,遗传易感性与预后差异有关,但目前的患者特征描述无法确定哪些脓毒症患者更倾向于发展为严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克。因此,鉴定预后生物标志物可能有助于识别这些高危患者,并有助于改善疾病的临床管理:在这项研究中,我们旨在确定败血症的分子模式。方法:我们采用加权基因共表达方法,对脓毒症患者的基因表达进行了分析:我们使用加权基因共表达分析(WGCNA)分析了 GSE63042,这是一个来自 129 名全身炎症反应综合征或败血症患者的 RNA 表达数据集,其中包括 78 名败血症幸存者和 28 名败血症非幸存者。这项分析包括确定区分败血症幸存者和非幸存者的基因模块,并对差异表达基因进行定性评估。然后,我们使用 STRING 的蛋白-蛋白相互作用和基因本体分析来确定顶级模块中基因的功能和通路关系。最后,我们利用 ROC 分析评估了中心基因的预后能力:结果:我们发现四个不同的共表达基因模块与脓毒症患者的存活率显著相关。我们的差异基因表达分析结合蛋白-蛋白相互作用和基因本体分析发现,这些模块的中心基因--TAF10、SNAPIN、PSME2、PSMB9、JUNB 和 CEBPD--可作为脓毒症预后的候选标记。与脓毒症幸存者相比,这些标记在脓毒症非幸存者中明显下调:结论:通过对脓毒症幸存者和非幸存者的转录组数据进行加权基因共表达分析、基因本体富集分析和蛋白-蛋白网络交互分析,发现TAF10、SNAPIN、PSME2、PSMB9、JUNB和CEBPD是脓毒症预后的潜在生物标志物。这些基因与适当的免疫反应相关,它们在脓毒症非存活者中的下调表明脓毒症晚期最终会出现免疫衰竭。然而,要验证这些基因在脓毒症进展和患者存活中的作用,还需要进一步的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: European Planning Studies provides a forum for ideas and information about spatial development processes and policies in Europe. The journal publishes articles of a theoretical, empirical and policy-relevant nature and is particularly concerned to integrate knowledge of processes with practical policy proposals, implementation and evaluation. Articles of particular interest to the journal focus upon specific spatial development problems, as well as emerging explanations of new urban, regional, national or supranational developmental tendencies. Country-specific, region-specific or locality-specific issues are focused upon, although comparative analysis is of especial value.
期刊最新文献
Environmental acceptability of suburban sprawl around two differently sized Czech cities New collaborations and novel innovations: the role of regional brokerage and collaboration intensity Privatisations, FDI, and Greece’s regional economic recovery: an empirical study of perceptual view of investors Conceptualizing ‘green’ in urban and regional planning – the cases of Oslo and Helsinki What are the driving factors for implementing participatory budgeting? A case study from Czechia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1