Intravenous Tocilizumab versus Standard of Care in the Treatment of Severe and Critical COVID-19-related Pneumonia: A Single-center, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Trial.

Q4 Medicine Acta Medica Philippina Pub Date : 2024-04-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.47895/amp.vi0.6175
Eric Jason B Amante, Aileen S David-Wang, Michael L Tee, Felix Eduardo R Punzalan, John C Añonuevo, Lenora C Fernandez, Albert B Albay, John Carlo M Malabad, Fresthel Monica M Climacosa, A Nico Nahar I Pajes, Patricia Maria Gregoria M Cuaño, Marissa M Alejandría
{"title":"Intravenous Tocilizumab versus Standard of Care in the Treatment of Severe and Critical COVID-19-related Pneumonia: A Single-center, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Trial.","authors":"Eric Jason B Amante, Aileen S David-Wang, Michael L Tee, Felix Eduardo R Punzalan, John C Añonuevo, Lenora C Fernandez, Albert B Albay, John Carlo M Malabad, Fresthel Monica M Climacosa, A Nico Nahar I Pajes, Patricia Maria Gregoria M Cuaño, Marissa M Alejandría","doi":"10.47895/amp.vi0.6175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe and critical COVID-19 disease is characterized by hyperinflammation involving pro-inflammatory cytokines, particularly IL-6. Tocilizumab is a monoclonal antibody that blocks IL-6 receptors.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the efficacy of tocilizumab in Filipino patients with severe to critical COVID-19 disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase 3 randomized double-blind trial, included patients hospitalized for severe or critical COVID-19 in a 1:1 ratio to receive either tocilizumab plus local standard of care or placebo plus standard of care. Patients were eligible for a repeat IV infusion within 24-48 hours if they deteriorated or did not improve. Treatment success or clinical improvement was defined as at least two categories of improvement from baseline in the WHO 7-point Ordinal Scale of patient status, in an intention-to-treat manner.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine (49) patients were randomized in the tocilizumab arm and 49 in the placebo arm. There was no significant difference in age, comorbidities, COVID-19 severity, need for mechanical ventilation, presence of acute respiratory distress syndrome, or biomarker levels between groups. Use of adjunctive therapy was similar between groups, with corticosteroid used in 91.8% in tocilizumab group and 81.6% in the placebo group, while remdesivir was used in 98% of participants in both groups.There was no significant difference between groups in terms of treatment success in both the intention-to-treat analysis (relative risk=1.05, 95% CI: 0.85-1.30) and per-protocol analysis (relative risk=0.98, 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.21). There was no significant difference in time to improvement of at least two categories relative to baseline on the 7-point Ordinal Scale of clinical status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of tocilizumab on top of standard of care in the management of patients with severe to critical COVID-19 did not result in significant improvement as defined by the WHO 7-point Ordinal Scale of patient status, nor in significant improvement in incidence of mechanical ventilation, incidence of ICU admission, length of ICU stay, and mortality rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":6994,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Philippina","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11151130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Philippina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.vi0.6175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Severe and critical COVID-19 disease is characterized by hyperinflammation involving pro-inflammatory cytokines, particularly IL-6. Tocilizumab is a monoclonal antibody that blocks IL-6 receptors.

Objectives: This study evaluated the efficacy of tocilizumab in Filipino patients with severe to critical COVID-19 disease.

Methods: This phase 3 randomized double-blind trial, included patients hospitalized for severe or critical COVID-19 in a 1:1 ratio to receive either tocilizumab plus local standard of care or placebo plus standard of care. Patients were eligible for a repeat IV infusion within 24-48 hours if they deteriorated or did not improve. Treatment success or clinical improvement was defined as at least two categories of improvement from baseline in the WHO 7-point Ordinal Scale of patient status, in an intention-to-treat manner.

Results: Forty-nine (49) patients were randomized in the tocilizumab arm and 49 in the placebo arm. There was no significant difference in age, comorbidities, COVID-19 severity, need for mechanical ventilation, presence of acute respiratory distress syndrome, or biomarker levels between groups. Use of adjunctive therapy was similar between groups, with corticosteroid used in 91.8% in tocilizumab group and 81.6% in the placebo group, while remdesivir was used in 98% of participants in both groups.There was no significant difference between groups in terms of treatment success in both the intention-to-treat analysis (relative risk=1.05, 95% CI: 0.85-1.30) and per-protocol analysis (relative risk=0.98, 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.21). There was no significant difference in time to improvement of at least two categories relative to baseline on the 7-point Ordinal Scale of clinical status.

Conclusion: The use of tocilizumab on top of standard of care in the management of patients with severe to critical COVID-19 did not result in significant improvement as defined by the WHO 7-point Ordinal Scale of patient status, nor in significant improvement in incidence of mechanical ventilation, incidence of ICU admission, length of ICU stay, and mortality rate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉注射托珠单抗与标准护理对比治疗严重和危重 COVID-19 相关肺炎:单中心、双盲、安慰剂对照 3 期试验。
背景:严重和危重的 COVID-19 疾病的特征是高炎症反应,其中包括促炎症细胞因子,尤其是 IL-6。Tocilizumab是一种阻断IL-6受体的单克隆抗体:本研究评估了托西珠单抗对患有严重至危重 COVID-19 疾病的菲律宾患者的疗效:这项3期随机双盲试验按1:1的比例纳入了因重度或危重COVID-19住院的患者,让他们接受托西珠单抗加当地标准治疗或安慰剂加标准治疗。如果病情恶化或没有改善,患者有资格在24-48小时内再次进行静脉输注。治疗成功或临床改善的定义是,按照意向治疗的方式,患者状况在世卫组织 7 点正则量表中比基线至少改善了两个类别:49名患者被随机分配到托珠单抗治疗组,49名患者被随机分配到安慰剂治疗组。两组患者在年龄、合并症、COVID-19 严重程度、机械通气需求、急性呼吸窘迫综合征或生物标志物水平方面无明显差异。在意向治疗分析(相对风险=1.05,95% CI:0.85-1.30)和按方案分析(相对风险=0.98,95% CI:0.80-1.21)中,治疗成功率在组间无显著差异。在临床状态的7点序数表中,与基线相比至少改善两个类别的时间没有明显差异:结论:在标准治疗的基础上使用托西珠单抗治疗重度至危重COVID-19患者,并不能明显改善世卫组织7点标准量表定义的患者状况,也不能明显改善机械通气的发生率、入住重症监护室的发生率、重症监护室的住院时间和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Medica Philippina
Acta Medica Philippina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
期刊最新文献
Establishing Age-friendly Communities in the Philippines: The Need to Empower Senior Citizens beyond the "Card". Early Outcomes of the Surgical Treatment of Non-traumatic Massive Pericardial Effusion in the University of the Philippines - Philippine General Hospital COVID-19 Referral Center. Predictors of Cognitive Impairment among Filipino Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in a Tertiary Government Hospital. Begin with the Ends in Mind. Factors Associated with Prolonged Length of Stay in the Ambulatory Care Unit of a Tertiary Government Hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1