Wikicouting: repensando a contabilidade pela perspectiva Noética

Pub Date : 2012-08-05 DOI:10.5007/1518-2924.2012V17N34P142
Alex de Araujo Lopes
{"title":"Wikicouting: repensando a contabilidade pela perspectiva Noética","authors":"Alex de Araujo Lopes","doi":"10.5007/1518-2924.2012V17N34P142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the new profile of accounting vis-a-vis the challenges of the era in which we experience the complexity that requires new attitudes to design knowledge, This is the era of parceling, with deep repercussions in various fields of science, and whose consolidation of a new model of knowledge generation born shaped by collaborative acts of economic, political and social. It is a reconfiguration of the present by evaluating the past to enhance the future, impregnated with the tacit knowledge, so neglected by the existing order. Complex thinking is post-Cartesian in the sense that it perceives that the Cartesian method only applies to “the simple”. When a system is complex, nothing is obvious, because everything depends on the look that is released; the whole and the parts evolve in a dialectical way: the whole is much more than the sum of the parts and the whole is understood from its purposes. Nothing is much closer to the sciences statements than their tactical element to the decision-making, in terms of Noetic. Thus, this paper aims to feed the sense of complexity inherent to Postmodernity, stressing the noetic model based on a Wiki, where the management accounting is presented as an alternative to a debate which is central to the corporations. We address the technology and its use as a shifting support to the paradigm that permeates the global society.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2012V17N34P142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article discusses the new profile of accounting vis-a-vis the challenges of the era in which we experience the complexity that requires new attitudes to design knowledge, This is the era of parceling, with deep repercussions in various fields of science, and whose consolidation of a new model of knowledge generation born shaped by collaborative acts of economic, political and social. It is a reconfiguration of the present by evaluating the past to enhance the future, impregnated with the tacit knowledge, so neglected by the existing order. Complex thinking is post-Cartesian in the sense that it perceives that the Cartesian method only applies to “the simple”. When a system is complex, nothing is obvious, because everything depends on the look that is released; the whole and the parts evolve in a dialectical way: the whole is much more than the sum of the parts and the whole is understood from its purposes. Nothing is much closer to the sciences statements than their tactical element to the decision-making, in terms of Noetic. Thus, this paper aims to feed the sense of complexity inherent to Postmodernity, stressing the noetic model based on a Wiki, where the management accounting is presented as an alternative to a debate which is central to the corporations. We address the technology and its use as a shifting support to the paradigm that permeates the global society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Wikicouting:从伦理学的角度重新思考会计
这篇文章讨论了会计的新面貌,面对这个时代的挑战,我们经历了复杂性,需要新的态度来设计知识。这是一个包装的时代,在各个科学领域产生了深刻的影响,并巩固了一种新的知识生成模式,这种模式是由经济、政治和社会的合作行为形成的。它是一种通过评价过去来增强未来的对现在的重新配置,充满了被现有秩序所忽视的隐性知识。复杂思维是后笛卡尔思维,因为它认为笛卡尔方法只适用于“简单”。当一个系统很复杂时,没有什么是显而易见的,因为一切都取决于所发布的外观;整体和部分以辩证的方式发展:整体远远大于部分的总和,整体是从其目的来理解的。就Noetic而言,没有什么比决策的策略元素更接近科学陈述了。因此,本文旨在提供后现代性固有的复杂性,强调基于Wiki的思维模型,其中管理会计被呈现为企业核心辩论的替代方案。我们将技术及其使用作为对渗透全球社会的范式的转变支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1