The feminism of T.H. Green: a late-Victorian success story?

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT Pub Date : 1991-01-01 DOI:10.4324/9781351148245-21
O. Anderson
{"title":"The feminism of T.H. Green: a late-Victorian success story?","authors":"O. Anderson","doi":"10.4324/9781351148245-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rather surprisingly, T.H.Green's ideas on women and the family are as neglected today as they were immediately after his death in 1882, when his thought was first interpreted for a wider public by his colleagues and friends.1 Silence on such matters in the 1880s is not remarkable. It is odd, however, that it persists today, despite recent intense concern with the history of women and the family, including their place in political thought, and despite reviving philosophical interest in the British Idealists and readiness to credit them with a significant impact on politics, education and social work. It has often been remarked that Green's political ideas have much in common superficially with those of John Stuart Mill, since their values and precepts are very similar, although the substructure of their thought is utterly different. Nevertheless it has altogether escaped notice that this is equally true of their ideas on women, marriage and family relationships. Today Mill's fabled feminism easily appears limited and imperceptive, and the priority he gave to the parliamentary vote strangely simplistic. Did Green show any greater realism and understanding? Did he practise as well as preach real equality between men and women, in private as well as public life? In short, what precisely was Green's position on 'the woman question'�?","PeriodicalId":51773,"journal":{"name":"HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351148245-21","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Rather surprisingly, T.H.Green's ideas on women and the family are as neglected today as they were immediately after his death in 1882, when his thought was first interpreted for a wider public by his colleagues and friends.1 Silence on such matters in the 1880s is not remarkable. It is odd, however, that it persists today, despite recent intense concern with the history of women and the family, including their place in political thought, and despite reviving philosophical interest in the British Idealists and readiness to credit them with a significant impact on politics, education and social work. It has often been remarked that Green's political ideas have much in common superficially with those of John Stuart Mill, since their values and precepts are very similar, although the substructure of their thought is utterly different. Nevertheless it has altogether escaped notice that this is equally true of their ideas on women, marriage and family relationships. Today Mill's fabled feminism easily appears limited and imperceptive, and the priority he gave to the parliamentary vote strangely simplistic. Did Green show any greater realism and understanding? Did he practise as well as preach real equality between men and women, in private as well as public life? In short, what precisely was Green's position on 'the woman question'�?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
T.H.格林的女权主义:维多利亚晚期的成功故事?
相当令人惊讶的是,t.h.格林关于妇女和家庭的观点在今天和在他1882年去世后一样被忽视,当时他的思想第一次被他的同事和朋友向更广泛的公众解释在19世纪80年代,对这些问题的沉默并不引人注目。然而,奇怪的是,尽管最近人们对妇女和家庭的历史,包括她们在政治思想中的地位非常关注,尽管人们重新对英国理想主义者产生了哲学上的兴趣,并准备把他们对政治、教育和社会工作的重大影响归功于他们,但这种观点今天仍然存在。人们经常说,格林的政治思想表面上与约翰·斯图亚特·密尔的政治思想有许多共同之处,因为他们的价值观和戒律非常相似,尽管他们的思想的底层结构完全不同。然而,人们完全没有注意到,他们对妇女、婚姻和家庭关系的看法也是如此。今天,密尔传说中的女权主义很容易显得有限和缺乏远见,他给予议会投票的优先权也奇怪地简单化了。格林表现出了更大的现实主义和理解力吗?无论是在私人生活还是在公共生活中,他是否既宣扬又实践了真正的男女平等?简而言之,格林在“女性问题”上的立场究竟是什么?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: History of Political Thought (HPT) is a quarterly journal which was launched in 1980 to fill a genuine academic need for a forum for work in this multi-disciplinary area. Although a subject central to the study of politics and history, researchers in this field had previously to compete for publication space in journals whose intellectual centres of gravity were located in other disciplines. The journal is devoted exclusively to the historical study of political ideas and associated methodological problems. The primary focus is on research papers, with extensive book reviews and bibliographic surveys also included. All articles are refereed.
期刊最新文献
Hobbes and the Perpetual Person of the State Leo Strauss, The Latin Averroists and the Eternity of the World Humboldt’s Individualism: Theorizing Social Individuality Rousseau, Franklin and Bourgeois Liberalism Machiavelli’s Warning: The Medici, Florence, Rome and New Princes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1