{"title":"The effectiveness of working memory training with the use of n-back task \nin a group of older adults","authors":"Agnieszka Chojak","doi":"10.5114/nan.2019.87725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim of the study: The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of working memory (WM) training. The vast majority of n-back training studies were conducted on populations of young people at the peak of their cognitive functioning. This study addressed the population of people over 60 years old (N = 30). Material and methods: Volunteers were randomly assigned to training groups. Effectiveness of trainings (n-back task in the experimental group and general knowledge quiz in the active control group) was examined across training groups. Participants were tested before and after a 25-day training regime, with the use of following tasks: Sternberg, Linear Syllogisms, Go No Go, Task Switching, Running Span, and Operation Span (OSPAN). Participants trained for about 20 minutes per day via the Internet. Results: Training gains were similar in both groups – there were no significant differences in changes of results between both groups. In most of the tasks the groups achieved better results in the second measurement. The advantage of n-back training were significantly shorter reaction times in difficult conditions in the Sternberg task, which can serve as an example of near transfer. Conclusions: Numerous studies show that some cognitive functions decrease with age, so the potential beneficiaries of WM training are older people. This study did not show differences in the effectiveness of the training methods used in this study. Further studies with larger samples are recommended to evaluate the possible effectiveness of WM training in older people.","PeriodicalId":41766,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychiatria i Neuropsychologia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5114/nan.2019.87725","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychiatria i Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/nan.2019.87725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim of the study: The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of working memory (WM) training. The vast majority of n-back training studies were conducted on populations of young people at the peak of their cognitive functioning. This study addressed the population of people over 60 years old (N = 30). Material and methods: Volunteers were randomly assigned to training groups. Effectiveness of trainings (n-back task in the experimental group and general knowledge quiz in the active control group) was examined across training groups. Participants were tested before and after a 25-day training regime, with the use of following tasks: Sternberg, Linear Syllogisms, Go No Go, Task Switching, Running Span, and Operation Span (OSPAN). Participants trained for about 20 minutes per day via the Internet. Results: Training gains were similar in both groups – there were no significant differences in changes of results between both groups. In most of the tasks the groups achieved better results in the second measurement. The advantage of n-back training were significantly shorter reaction times in difficult conditions in the Sternberg task, which can serve as an example of near transfer. Conclusions: Numerous studies show that some cognitive functions decrease with age, so the potential beneficiaries of WM training are older people. This study did not show differences in the effectiveness of the training methods used in this study. Further studies with larger samples are recommended to evaluate the possible effectiveness of WM training in older people.
研究目的:研究的目的是评估工作记忆(WM)训练的有效性。绝大多数的n-back训练研究都是针对处于认知功能巅峰的年轻人进行的。本研究针对60岁以上人群(N = 30)。材料和方法:志愿者被随机分配到训练组。不同训练组的训练效果(实验组为n-back任务,积极对照组为常识测验)比较。参与者在为期25天的训练前后进行测试,使用以下任务:Sternberg,线性三段论,Go No Go,任务切换,运行广度和操作广度(osspan)。参与者每天通过互联网进行大约20分钟的训练。结果:两组的训练收益相似,两组之间的结果变化无显著差异。在大多数任务中,小组在第二次测量中取得了更好的结果。n-back训练的优势是在Sternberg任务的困难条件下显著缩短反应时间,这可以作为近迁移的一个例子。结论:大量研究表明,一些认知功能随着年龄的增长而下降,因此WM训练的潜在受益者是老年人。这项研究并没有显示研究中使用的训练方法的有效性差异。建议进行更大样本的进一步研究,以评估WM训练对老年人的可能有效性。