Towards a Politics of Literature in Late Foucault: Parrhesia and Mimesis

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE PHILOSOPHIE Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.3917/rip.292.0029
A. G. Blanco
{"title":"Towards a Politics of Literature in Late Foucault: Parrhesia and Mimesis","authors":"A. G. Blanco","doi":"10.3917/rip.292.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article posits that in Foucault’s later work we find not a forgetting of literature, but a reformulation of the role that literature had come to occupy in his work, and that, in this later work, there is a trace of the texts on literary thought that he wrote from the 1960s to the mid-1970s. Drawing upon Foucault’s later work, I reconsider the key question: What relationship does literature, as literature, have with the political dimension of discourses? This necessarily goes hand-in-hand with the classic question concerning the truth of literature: How does literature tell the truth?","PeriodicalId":44846,"journal":{"name":"REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE PHILOSOPHIE","volume":"1 1","pages":"29-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE PHILOSOPHIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/rip.292.0029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article posits that in Foucault’s later work we find not a forgetting of literature, but a reformulation of the role that literature had come to occupy in his work, and that, in this later work, there is a trace of the texts on literary thought that he wrote from the 1960s to the mid-1970s. Drawing upon Foucault’s later work, I reconsider the key question: What relationship does literature, as literature, have with the political dimension of discourses? This necessarily goes hand-in-hand with the classic question concerning the truth of literature: How does literature tell the truth?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向晚期福柯的文学政治:直言与模仿
这篇文章认为,在福柯后期的作品中,我们发现的不是对文学的遗忘,而是对文学在他的作品中所占据的角色的重新表述,而且,在这部后期的作品中,有他在20世纪60年代到70年代中期所写的关于文学思想的文本的痕迹。借鉴福柯的后期作品,我重新思考了一个关键问题:文学,作为文学,与话语的政治维度有什么关系?这必然与关于文学真实性的经典问题密切相关:文学如何讲述真相?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Se tromper de bonne foi « Éclipse de raison »François Lamy contre la musique Pensées Imperceptibles in Arnauld and Nicole La psychologie cartésienne turlupinée et l’anthropologie secrète de Pierre Nicole Do We Take Notice of All Our Mental Acts?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1