Musealisation of communism, or how to create national identity in historical museums

IF 0.6 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Muzeologia a Kulturne Dedicstvo-Museology and Cultural Heritage Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.46284/mkd.2020.8.4.5
A. Ziębińska-Witek
{"title":"Musealisation of communism, or how to create national identity in historical museums","authors":"A. Ziębińska-Witek","doi":"10.46284/mkd.2020.8.4.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of the article is to critically analyse and deconstruct museum narratives about communism in East-Central Europe 30 years after transformation. The research material is museum exhibitions interpreted in accordance with the methodology of visual research (composition analysis, content analysis, analysis of material objects, and analysis of meanings). The first and most important museum type from the perspective of the memory cano The Act of 6 June 1997 Penal Code (Journal of Laws of 1997, item 553). Art. 125. § 1. Whoever destroys, damages or takes away a cultural object in an occupied area or in which military operations are taking place, violating international law, shall be subject to the penalty of deprivation of liberty for a term of between one and 10 years. § 2. If the act concerns goods of particular importance for culture, the perpetrator shall be subject to the penalty of deprivation of liberty for not less than 3 years. Art. 278. § 1. Whoever takes away someone else’s movable property for the purpose of appropriation shall be subject to the penalty of deprivation of liberty for a term of between 3 months and 5 years. § 2. The same punishment shall be imposed on anyone who, without the consent of the authorised person, obtains someone else’s computer program in order to gain financial benefits. § 3. In the case of an act of a lesser significance, the perpetrator is subject to a fine, limitation of liberty or deprivation of liberty for one year. § 4. If the theft was committed to the detriment of the closest person, the prosecution takes place at the request of the injured party. Art. 279. § 1. Whoever steals by burglary is punishable by imprisonment from one to 10 years. § 2. If the burglary was committed to the detriment of the closest person, the prosecution takes place at the request of the injured party. n, as it represents the official historical policy of most East-European states, is the so-called identity or heroic museum. Its purpose is not so much to show the truth about the past but to create the collective memory of a society and its positive self-image.","PeriodicalId":41312,"journal":{"name":"Muzeologia a Kulturne Dedicstvo-Museology and Cultural Heritage","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muzeologia a Kulturne Dedicstvo-Museology and Cultural Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46284/mkd.2020.8.4.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The goal of the article is to critically analyse and deconstruct museum narratives about communism in East-Central Europe 30 years after transformation. The research material is museum exhibitions interpreted in accordance with the methodology of visual research (composition analysis, content analysis, analysis of material objects, and analysis of meanings). The first and most important museum type from the perspective of the memory cano The Act of 6 June 1997 Penal Code (Journal of Laws of 1997, item 553). Art. 125. § 1. Whoever destroys, damages or takes away a cultural object in an occupied area or in which military operations are taking place, violating international law, shall be subject to the penalty of deprivation of liberty for a term of between one and 10 years. § 2. If the act concerns goods of particular importance for culture, the perpetrator shall be subject to the penalty of deprivation of liberty for not less than 3 years. Art. 278. § 1. Whoever takes away someone else’s movable property for the purpose of appropriation shall be subject to the penalty of deprivation of liberty for a term of between 3 months and 5 years. § 2. The same punishment shall be imposed on anyone who, without the consent of the authorised person, obtains someone else’s computer program in order to gain financial benefits. § 3. In the case of an act of a lesser significance, the perpetrator is subject to a fine, limitation of liberty or deprivation of liberty for one year. § 4. If the theft was committed to the detriment of the closest person, the prosecution takes place at the request of the injured party. Art. 279. § 1. Whoever steals by burglary is punishable by imprisonment from one to 10 years. § 2. If the burglary was committed to the detriment of the closest person, the prosecution takes place at the request of the injured party. n, as it represents the official historical policy of most East-European states, is the so-called identity or heroic museum. Its purpose is not so much to show the truth about the past but to create the collective memory of a society and its positive self-image.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共产主义的博物馆化,或如何在历史博物馆中创造民族认同
本文的目的是批判性地分析和解构关于东欧和中欧共产主义在转型后30年的博物馆叙事。研究材料是按照视觉研究的方法论(构成分析、内容分析、实物分析、意义分析)解读的博物馆展览。从记忆的角度来看,第一个也是最重要的博物馆类型是1997年6月6日的《刑法典》(1997年《法律杂志》,第553项)。125年艺术。。§1。违反国际法破坏、损害或带走被占领地区或军事行动地区内的文物者,应处剥夺自由一至十年以下徒刑。§2。如果该行为涉及对文化特别重要的物品,行为人应受到不少于3年的剥夺自由的处罚。278年艺术。。§1。以占有为目的夺取他人动产的,处三个月以上五年以下剥夺自由的处。§2。未经被授权人同意,获取他人计算机程序以获取经济利益的,也应当处以同样的处罚。§3。如果是严重程度较轻的行为,行为人将受到罚款、限制自由或剥夺自由一年的处罚。§4。如果盗窃行为对最亲近的人造成了损害,则应受害方的请求进行起诉。279年艺术。。§1。入室盗窃的人可处一至十年徒刑。§2。如果盗窃行为对最亲近的人造成了损害,则应受害方的要求进行起诉。n,因为它代表了大多数东欧国家的官方历史政策,是所谓的身份或英雄博物馆。它的目的与其说是展示过去的真相,不如说是创造一个社会的集体记忆及其积极的自我形象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
Generation Z perspectives on museum sustainability using Q methodology From Biography to a Net of Interpretations: The Plurality of Approaches to Vladimír Karfík’s work Preparing for the post-war reconstruction of historical monuments in Ukraine: Considerations in regard of the ongoing Polish post-WWII experience and international law on the protection and conservation of historical monuments Museum as technology Values as a base for the viable adaptive reuse of fortified heritage in urban contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1