Mobbing: violence at work or semantic abuse – the evaluation of the phenomenon by professionally active nurses

M. Pasek, J. Skrzeczyńska, G. Dębska, H. Kadučáková, L. Suchocka, A. Goździalska
{"title":"Mobbing: violence at work or semantic abuse – the evaluation of the phenomenon by professionally active nurses","authors":"M. Pasek, J. Skrzeczyńska, G. Dębska, H. Kadučáková, L. Suchocka, A. Goździalska","doi":"10.5114/ppiel.2020.98768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim of the study: To assess the frequency of occurrence of mobbing in the work environment of professionally active nurses. Material and methods: In order to collect data, the diagnostic survey method was deployed. The research instru-ments were a questionnaire designed by the author of this paper and a standardised questionnaire: Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ). Data for the study were collected from a sample of 150 professional nurses. Most of the respondents worked as a staff nurse. Results: The assessed work environments were generally favourable in the group of respondents. On the other hand, the approaches to employees were perceived as mostly negative. The majority of the nurses participating in the research reported facing mobbing behaviour in the workplace. The majority of manifestations of mobbing that were experienced by the subjects in the last six months were creating rumours about the subjects, ignoring their views and opinions, and excessive control of their work. Conclusions: It is advisable to introduce wide research on mobbing based on a standardised survey method. It can help in a wider analysis and comparison of the mobbing aspects at workplaces. The results obtained could be used to develop recovery programs in health care. A. Study design/planning • B. Data collection/entry • C. Data analysis/statistics • D. Data interpretation • E. Preparation of manuscript • F. Literature analysis/search • G. Funds collection","PeriodicalId":34285,"journal":{"name":"Problemy Pielegniarstwa","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemy Pielegniarstwa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ppiel.2020.98768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aim of the study: To assess the frequency of occurrence of mobbing in the work environment of professionally active nurses. Material and methods: In order to collect data, the diagnostic survey method was deployed. The research instru-ments were a questionnaire designed by the author of this paper and a standardised questionnaire: Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ). Data for the study were collected from a sample of 150 professional nurses. Most of the respondents worked as a staff nurse. Results: The assessed work environments were generally favourable in the group of respondents. On the other hand, the approaches to employees were perceived as mostly negative. The majority of the nurses participating in the research reported facing mobbing behaviour in the workplace. The majority of manifestations of mobbing that were experienced by the subjects in the last six months were creating rumours about the subjects, ignoring their views and opinions, and excessive control of their work. Conclusions: It is advisable to introduce wide research on mobbing based on a standardised survey method. It can help in a wider analysis and comparison of the mobbing aspects at workplaces. The results obtained could be used to develop recovery programs in health care. A. Study design/planning • B. Data collection/entry • C. Data analysis/statistics • D. Data interpretation • E. Preparation of manuscript • F. Literature analysis/search • G. Funds collection
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围攻:工作中的暴力或语义滥用——专业活跃护士对这一现象的评价
研究目的:了解职业活跃护士工作环境中围堵事件的发生频率。材料与方法:为收集资料,采用诊断调查法。研究工具为自行设计的问卷和标准化的负面行为问卷(NAQ)。这项研究的数据是从150名专业护士中收集的。大多数被调查者的工作是专职护士。结果:被评估的工作环境总体上是有利的。另一方面,对员工的态度大多被认为是消极的。参与这项研究的大多数护士报告说,他们在工作场所面临着被围攻的行为。在过去的六个月里,被调查者所经历的大多数围攻表现为制造关于被调查者的谣言,无视他们的观点和意见,以及过度控制他们的工作。结论:采用标准化的调查方法,广泛开展围捕研究是可取的。它可以帮助更广泛地分析和比较工作场所的围攻方面。获得的结果可用于制定医疗保健中的康复计划。A.研究设计/计划•B.数据收集/录入•C.数据分析/统计•D.数据解释•E.稿件准备•F.文献分析/检索•G.资金募集
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Vaccination of Polish pregnant women in the perinatal period against COVID -19 External cephalic version as an opportunity to reduce the percentage of elective caesarean sections Presenteeism – a common phenomenon in the study population of nurses Comparative study of the incidences of hospital infections in the burn department: the years 2015 vs. 2022 Selected health behaviours of nursing students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1