Comparative evaluation of some crop yield prediction models using tropical cowpea yield-weather data

K. O. Adekalu, D. A. Okunade
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of some crop yield prediction models using tropical cowpea yield-weather data","authors":"K. O. Adekalu, D. A. Okunade","doi":"10.4314/DAI.V19I2.15788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A computer program was adopted from the work of Hill et al. (1982) to calibrate and test three of the existing yield prediction models using tropical cowpea yieldÐweather data. The models tested were Hanks Model (first and second versions). Stewart Model (first and second versions) and HallÐButcher Model. Three sets of cowpea yield-water use and weather data were collected. The first one was used for calibration and the other two for validation. The results obtained from the models were compared with field values using correlation coefficient and mean error of deviation. Stewart first model had r-values of 0.93\nand 0.74 and mean error of deviation of 0.1 and 0.15. The second model had r-values of 0.92 and 0.86 and mean error of deviation of 0.05 and 0.11. Hanks first model had r-values of 0.94 and 0.89 and average mean error of deviation of 0.03 and 0.10, the second model had r values of 0.93 and .096 and average mean error of deviation of 0.05 and 0.03. The r-values for Hall-Butcher model were 0.76 and 0.96. The mean errors of deviation were 0.14 and 0.03. Generally, Hanks model predicted better than the other models but may still need to be further modified to be able to predict well for tropical conditions. Keywords : Prediction model, yield prediction, yield parameters, Hanks model, Stewart model, Hall Ð Butcher model, cowpea yield, tropical climatic conditions Discovery and Innovation Vol. 19 (2) 2007: pp. 89-95","PeriodicalId":50577,"journal":{"name":"Discovery and Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discovery and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/DAI.V19I2.15788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A computer program was adopted from the work of Hill et al. (1982) to calibrate and test three of the existing yield prediction models using tropical cowpea yieldÐweather data. The models tested were Hanks Model (first and second versions). Stewart Model (first and second versions) and HallÐButcher Model. Three sets of cowpea yield-water use and weather data were collected. The first one was used for calibration and the other two for validation. The results obtained from the models were compared with field values using correlation coefficient and mean error of deviation. Stewart first model had r-values of 0.93 and 0.74 and mean error of deviation of 0.1 and 0.15. The second model had r-values of 0.92 and 0.86 and mean error of deviation of 0.05 and 0.11. Hanks first model had r-values of 0.94 and 0.89 and average mean error of deviation of 0.03 and 0.10, the second model had r values of 0.93 and .096 and average mean error of deviation of 0.05 and 0.03. The r-values for Hall-Butcher model were 0.76 and 0.96. The mean errors of deviation were 0.14 and 0.03. Generally, Hanks model predicted better than the other models but may still need to be further modified to be able to predict well for tropical conditions. Keywords : Prediction model, yield prediction, yield parameters, Hanks model, Stewart model, Hall Ð Butcher model, cowpea yield, tropical climatic conditions Discovery and Innovation Vol. 19 (2) 2007: pp. 89-95
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
几种利用热带豇豆产量-天气数据的作物产量预测模型的比较评价
采用Hill等人(1982)的计算机程序,利用热带豇豆yieldÐweather数据对现有的三种产量预测模型进行校准和测试。被测模型为汉克斯模型(第一版和第二版)。Stewart模型(第一版和第二版)和HallÐButcher模型。收集了三组豇豆产量-水分利用和天气数据。第一个用于校准,另外两个用于验证。利用相关系数和偏差的平均误差,将模型结果与现场值进行了比较。Stewart第一模型的r值分别为0.93和0.74,平均误差偏差分别为0.1和0.15。第二个模型的r值分别为0.92和0.86,平均偏差分别为0.05和0.11。汉克斯第一个模型的r值分别为0.94和0.89,偏差的平均误差分别为0.03和0.10;第二个模型的r值分别为0.93和0.096,偏差的平均误差分别为0.05和0.03。Hall-Butcher模型的r值分别为0.76和0.96。偏差的平均误差为0.14和0.03。一般来说,汉克斯模型比其他模型预测得更好,但可能仍需要进一步修改以能够很好地预测热带条件。关键词:预测模型,产量预测,产量参数,Hanks模型,Stewart模型,Hall Ð Butcher模型,豇豆产量,热带气候条件发现与创新Vol. 19 (2) 2007: pp. 89-95
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prototype design and performance analysis of a sieving machine for improved food slurry processing in Nigeria. Vegetation Diversity and Composition of Bindura Mining Town in Zimbabwe Classifications of image features: a survey Plantation Forestry in Sub Saharan Africa: Silvicultural, Ecological and Economic Aspects Assessment of Charcoal Production and Impact of Environmental Policies in Limited Forest Resources Countries: The case of Togo, West Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1